Skip to content

Tag: libertarianism

USSA News and Commentary

Jacob Hornberger: President Trump, Release the JFK Files.

Glenn Greenwald: Biden, the Media and CIA Labeled the Hunter Biden Emails “Russian Disinformation.” There is Still No Evidence.

Dave DeCamp: Biden’s Pentagon Transition Team Members Funded by the Arms Industry.

Ray McGovern: What is John Brennan So Worried About?

Whitney Webb: US – UK Intel Agencies Declare Cyber War on Independent Media.

Sam Jacobs: National Election Fraud: Evidence of National Chicanery During America’s 2020 Presidential Election.

The Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex Is Fascism.

David Stockman: Hey, Goldman Sachs, Keep Your Stinkin’ Lottery Tickets

And Daniel Diefenbach: When Should Libertarians Attach Themselves to Political Causes?

News and Commentary in 21st Century USSA

Hans-Hermann Hoppe: On the Impossibility of Limited Government and the Prospects for a Second American Revolution (by Means of Secession). (2001, 2008)

Caitlin Johnstone: Don’t Fool Yourself: Your Biden Vote Was Not A “Vote Against Fascism”

Thomas Knapp: November 3: D-Day in the War to End the War on Drugs.

Aaron Kesel: Information War? Internet Archive To Rewrite History With Alerts for Sites That Have Been Fact Checked. (That’s the Wayback Machine. But one purpose of the Wayback Machine is for a journalist or researcher to be able to go back to an archive of how a particular web page originally appeared. The content need not be “accurate.” The is turning what was a great historical Internet source into a government propaganda outlet. Shame.)

Charles Burris: Glenn Greenwald: No Matter the Liberal Metric Chosen, the Bush/Cheney Administration Was Far Worse Than Trump

George La Noue: Critical Race Training or Civil Rights Law: We Can’t Have Both.

Shane Coules: The Absurdity of Lockdown 2.0.

Daniel Larison: Why the U.S. Must Not Support Azerbaijan’s War.

Brandon Smith: A Biden Presidency Will Mean a Faster US Collapse.

Breitbart: Rod Blagojevich: Democrats Stealing Elections a “Time-Honored Tradition”.

Tom Blanton: Clowns That Voted.

Tim Cushing:  Appeals Court Denies Immunity To Cop Who Broke A Truck Driver’s Jaw During A ‘Routine Accident Investigation’

Gateway Pundit: “This Felt Like a Drug Deal!” – Asian-American Ballot Observer in Detroit Describes Mysterious Van Dropping Off 61 Boxes of Ballots at 4 AM (VIDEO).

Town Hall: Paper Warned About the Software Company at Center of Ballot Glitches in Swing States; UPDATE: MI SOS Responds.

And Newsmax: Fox News Cancels ‘Justice With Judge Jeanine’ This Weekend Over Trump.

Some Post-Election Comments

I’m posting this around noon, with no word on who the next puppet will be, Trump or Biden (i.e. Harris).

The final vote tally is not yet ready, but it looks like Libertarian Party presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen is getting roughly 1 to 2% of the vote. She might as well be Lyndon LaRouche. In 2016 Gary Johnson the pothead got roughly 3.27% of the vote which was the highest ever for the LP.

I think that, had the hacks and apparatchiks of the “Libertarian” Party gone with Jacob Hornberger as their presidential nominee (the one the actual voters in the state primaries overwhelmingly voted for), there would have been a lot more enthusiasm among many in the Liberty movement, probably better publicity and more support. I am not saying that Jacob could have taken that many votes away from Trump and Biden to get much more over 3 or 4%. But, he was the better, more consistently libertarian and principled candidate.

But nooo, the hacks and apparatchiks of the “Libertarian” Party snubbed the voters of the primaries and went with the “social justice” crap, this obsession with gender and race that “social justice warriors” seem to have.

I would definitely support a 2024 LP candidate Jacob Hornberger, who will be only 74 then. Hell, I’d support Ron Paul at age 89 in 2024 for President. But, it looks like we probably won’t have an America anymore by 2024, because the Democrats and Republicans have turned the country into Amerika, and getting worse.

My preference instead is to just get rid of Washington, D.C., because it has outlasted its usefulness, whatever usefulness it ever had (which is to say, none). Decentralization is the answer to all this.

I know, I know. It is unrealistic to hope that someday the libertarian message will get across to the masses, when the government controls the education system and the mass media. That was apparent way back in 1988 after I voted for Libertarian Party nominee Ron Paul and then saw that he received just a few hundred thousand votes. The “news” media didn’t really report on his candidacy. There was no change in the reporting from the “news” media in 1992 with that election’s terrible LP nominee, Andre Marrou.

Back then, the “news” media would declare: “There are only Republican and Democrat, and that’s it.” Anyone who had views that strayed from the beloved Establishment, views that challenged the statist quo, were “fringe” or “extremists,” and shouldn’t be taken seriously.

Had today’s “news” media morons been around during the time of the American Revolution, those who promoted property rights, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence would have been run out of town and dismissed as “fringe” and “extremists,” as today’s promoters of liberty still are. Nothing has changed in all these decades in which the government has controlled education and dumbed down generations of people.

The ignorant “news” media along with the dumb-dumbs of the Democrat Party went with a corrupt Alzheimer’s sufferer as their favored candidate for President. That tells us something, doesn’t it?

And you can see how the low-IQ “news” media and their social media compadres are now not only ignoring libertarians and otherwise anti-Establishment dissidents but outright smearing, blacklisting and censoring them.

So while we’re all waiting, waiting, waiting to get final results of the election, election officials are counting, counting, counting ballots, mail-in ballots, absentee, as well as making up and stuffing ballots, putting in names of dead people, finding “lost” ballots in their car trunks and refrigerators, and more. And it’s mostly Democrats doing those cheating things.

Yes, Republicans have cheated and stolen elections or nominations, such as the Romney people stealing the nomination away from Ron Paul in 2012, but mainly it’s Democrats doing most of the cheating. They are the ones who want to extend ballot deadlines well past the date of the election, so they have more time to throw out Republican ballots and make up new ballots. The Democrats are the party of “ranked choice,” which is used to intentionally confuse voters and so the third runner-up will be the winner and not the actual top vote-getter. And the Democrats are the party who don’t want ID requirements to verify a voter’s identity. It’s easier to cheat without being required to identify yourself. Duh.

And in this election specifically, the Democrat and leftist people have shown how unhinged they are in their hatred of Donald Trump. I’ve never seen anything like it in all my years.

First they make up a “Russia collusions, interfering in the election” scheme, along with a made-up Steele dossier that was used to present false information to the FISA court to illegally spy on the Trump campaign (a collusions accusation that was all debunked by the Mueller report). And then they have a CIA “whistleblower” use an everyday phone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president to try to impeach Trump, which didn’t succeed. And then the Covid scamdemic, whose main purpose was to terrorize the masses to fear voting in person on November 3rd so they would want to mail in ballots, so the mail-in balloting could be used for massive cheating and voter fraud (like they’re doing right now). The scamdemic terrorism and panic was also used to tank the economy, and tank they did, to try to undo Trump’s economic successes with the tax-cut-stimulated economic expansion and extremely low unemployment rate.

But despite the schemes and the cheating, by extremist, unhinged low-IQ psychopaths and loony-tunes Democrats and their “national security” partners, Trump will probably still win reelection. Nancy Lugosi will begin the first of many impeachment proceedings because she and the other wackos just don’t like him. But the House will stay under Democrat control for that wonderful gridlock. If you’re pro-liberty, should should appreciate gridlock. And if Biden still wins, the Senate looks like it will remain Republican controlled to slow down the Democrats in the Soviet-clone communist paradise they are drooling to inflict on the rest of us.

Ignorant, government-loving Trump still hasn’t drained the swamp, and it doesn’t seem he ever will. Not with Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr, Chris Wray and Gina Haspel, as well as the Goldman Sachs crowd including Steven Mnuchin. And all the military generals Trump has surrounded himself with, all those horrible interventionists, neocons, militarists, globalists, etc.

In 2012 there was a good chance that a Republican presidential nominee Ron Paul could have ousted Obama, because Dr. Paul was the only candidate who was beating Obama in the polls in head-to-head matches. Romney is…whatever.

But the truth is, the only way now to save our hanging-by-a-thread civilized society is to decentralize the society. That means getting rid of the government in Washington, even through secession if necessary. Such a notion bothers a lot of people who are long-time nationalists, like most conservatives especially. But that is what needs to be done. Otherwise, it is becoming Soviet Union 2.0 and that’s not good.

News and Commentary

Jacob Hornberger: Needed: A Faith in Freedom.

Jeffrey Tucker: The New Feudalism.

Robert Wenzel: Shady CDC Cancels Flu Data Collection for the Coming Flu Season

MassPrivateI: The Border Patrol Is Monitoring Millions Of Americans’ Cellphones Inside Their Homes.

Patrick Lawrence: The Revelations of WikiLeaks: Opening the CIA’s Vault.

Ron Paul: ‘Iraq War Diaries’ At Ten Years: Truth is Treason

Jo Jorgensen: Republicans and Democrats Will Never Deliver Peace.

Laurence Vance: A Trifecta of Evil

John Nolte: New York Times Accidentally Confirms Breitbart’s Voter Fraud Reporting.

And Scott Sumner: Is Progressivism a Scam?

Against Judge Amy Coney Barrett

In her testimony to be confirmed the next U.S. Supreme Court Justice, Judge Amy Coney Barrett said she doesn’t have an “agenda,” and will judge cases based on the “law.”

Well, there are thousands and thousands of “laws” on the books that are unjust or bad laws, and they shouldn’t exist. I want judges who come to the side of the individual, who come to the side of whoever’s life the enforcement of such bad laws is criminally violating.

And of course that applies to unlawful, unconstitutional executive orders such as orders without due process by fascist governors that businesses must shut down, people must stay inside, people may not gather in groups, or that people must wear useless, ineffective masks that cause oxygen deprivation, anxiety and other psychological issues.

So, regarding terrible, unjust “laws” and unconstitutional executive orders issued by fascist governors and mayors, Judge Barrett sided with the other two schnooks in her three-judge panel of the 7th Circus approving Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s unconstitutional lockdown orders and limits on gatherings.

Judge Barrett sides with the government diktats here and opposes liberty, freedom of assembly, and due process. She also seems to go along with the official COVID narrative, a false narrative if there ever was one.

I want Supreme Court “Justices” who side with those who aren’t buying the official COVID narrative that the mainstream media morons have been propagandizing without question, just as we need those who aren’t buying the official 9/11 narrative or any other official narrative. People who understand that government bureaucrats are inherently liars and shouldn’t be believed.

Speaking of useless, ineffective masks, a recent CDC study found that 71% of patients testing positive for COVID-19 had “always” worn the masks, and 14% of the infected wore them “often.” Does Judge Barrett know this? (Probably not. She probably relies on mainstream “news” media for “news” while the real news gets further censored by Fakebook and Twitter. But I digress.

As Chuck Baldwin noted, based on her previous opinions it looks like Judge Barrett will rubber-stamp the COVID police state and forced vaccines, and probably the surveillance state as well, i.e. obediently rubber-stamping the government against our rights and civil liberties. Because gullible Amy is a typical “good citizen” who believes what the government and its bureaucrats tell us, as repeated by the mainstream media morons.

They’re mostly the same, these statists, and their decisions can be predictable. (As I wrote in December of 2018 regarding the swamp creature AG Bill Barr, there will not be any indictments of Comey, Brennan, Clapper, Yates, McCabe, etc., at least I am not holding my breath. And it looks like I was right.)

What we really need is to abolish the “Supreme” Court, i.e. Supreme Bureaucrats, because a society dependent on the word of 9 robed apparatchiks as far as whether people may or may not live their lives freely and unmolested by bureaucrats and their armed goons is a society of “sheeple.”

But, if we must have a U.S. “Supreme” Court, we would be better off if they erred on the side of the individual, and on the side of one’s rights as recognized by the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights, and on the side of one’s justly owned property.

Instead, we have apparatchiks who err on the side of the State, and who don’t want to “second guess” the wise judgment of the police, as well as the CIA, NSA and all those other agencies that are not authorized by the U.S. Constitution to begin with.

For example, if a case is a lawsuit by an individual against the CIA for violating the rights of the individual, I want the “Supreme” Court Justice to rule that the CIA was not even authorized by the Constitution in the first place, and that it be abolished. Throw the case out! (Of course, the obedient sheeple who are indoctrinated to believe that the “national security” bureaucrats in Washington have the interests of the people at heart would go nuts if their beloved CIA or NSA were let go.)

And also, in many cases it shouldn’t matter what the details of the case are. For instance, if there is a dispute between an individual and the IRS, it doesn’t matter what specific bureaucratic laws have been disobeyed by the individual serf, or the details of the case. The Justice should recognize the criminality of an agency demanding someone’s funds or earnings in the absence of a voluntary contract, or demanding one’s private, personal information such as one’s employment or compensation matters that are none of the government’s business. If the U.S. Constitution needs to be cited, then it doesn’t even matter if the dubious 16th Amendment authorizes an income theft and an IRS. The unconstitutionality of the IRS racket and its bureaucrats can be cited by the “Justice” by bringing up the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, and the Ninth Amendment as well.

And the “War on Drugs” needs to be “overturned” as well. The “Supreme” Court upheld the government police breaking into someone’s home, terrorizing the people there and arresting and abducting them, because the police smelled marijuana and/or heard the toilet flushing. An 8-1 decision with the “liberals” (except Ruth Bader Ginsburg) joining the majority of the authoritarian neanderthals. They’re useless.

All laws and government bureaucracies intruding into the people’s private decisions regarding what they ingest are unjust laws. Who owns your body? If you own your body then you decide and control what you may or may not, or will or will not, put into your own body. Prohibition laws violate your right of self-ownership. This also applies to forced vaccine mandates as well.

But if the government owns “your” body, then of course the government decides for you and controls what you may or may not put into “your” body as well as the government may inflict whatever “medicines” including vaccines (or whatever poisons it chooses to call “medicine”) into you, involuntarily.

What kind of “Supreme” Court Justice would approve of such a society, such a life of serfdom to live? That’s not the kind of “Justice” I would want on a “Supreme” Court.

Replace Judge Amy Coney Barrett as a nominee, who says she “has no agenda,” with someone who does have an agenda, one that protects the individual from the criminal intrusions of the rulers, bureaucrats and armed police.

News and Commentary in Orwellian USSA Amerika

Sheldon Richman: Is Socialism Good in Theory?

Jon Rappoport: The Fake Coronavirus and the Missing Study: The Secret in Plain Sight, and Yet Another Case of the Missing Virus; They Lied and Locked Down the World.

Laurence Vance: What Would Happen?

Jennifer Bilek: Not Just a Tattoo: Transgenderism Attacks Our Fundamental Humanity.

Marjorie Cohn: Assange Faces Extradition for Exposing US War Crimes

Moon of Alabama: Not News But A Juicy Collection Of Narratives – How The New York Times Failed Its Readers.

Jacob Hornberger: Needed: Libertarian Faith in Freedom.

Ron Paul: Can the Fed End Racism?

And Charles Hugh Smith: How We Institutionalized Incompetence.

USSA, R.I.P.? (And Other News)

Ryan McMaken: The Media Is Now Openly Pushing Secession as the Election Nears.

Doug Casey: Doug Casey on What Happens After The Election

Joseph Mercola: What Will It Take for Masks and Face Shields to End?

Brian Jones: Why We Should Question the Narrative on Masks.

Jon Rappoport: COVID: The Virus That Isn’t There: The Root Fraud Exposed

Jacob Hornberger: Where are Open Borders in the Presidential Race?

Aaron Maté: Pelosis Take a Big Stake in CrowdStrike, Democrat-Connected Linchpin of Russia Probe.

Jon Miltimore: Why Would YouTube Suppress Our New Video on Disney, Chinese Genocide, and Mulan?

Jonathan Turley: YouTube Reportedly Shuts Down Farrakhan And The Nation Of Islam.

Philip Giraldi: Thought Control American Style: The Social Justice Warriors Will Destroy Our Basic Freedoms.

Whitney Webb: Operation Warp Speed is Using a CIA-Linked Contractor to Keep Covid-19 Vaccine Contracts Secret.

Laurence Vance: Is Libertarianism Immoral?

Lew Rockwell: The Core of Austrian Economic Theory.

Lawrence Reed: Diamond Jim: Gilded-Age Greed or Heart of Gold?

David Henderson: More Capital Per Worker Makes Workers More Productive.

Ted Galen Carpenter: Paranoia About Trump and Russia is Dangerous for Our Foreign Policy.

Becky Akers: The World Turned Upside Down

And Vasko Kohlmayer: What Motivates America’s Revolutionists?

More News and Commentary

Jeff Tucker: Lockdown: The New Totalitarianism

Jon Rappoport: Trump Still in Danger: Doctors Added Third Drug to his Reckless Experimental Treatment.

Jeff Deist: The Absurdity of Covid “Cases”

Aaron Kesel: Thousands Of Mathematicians Call For Boycotting Predictive Crime A.I. From Police.

Doug Bandow: Is America Fit To ‘Lead’ the World?

Patrick Cockburn: The Assange Extradition Case Is an Exceptional Attack on Press Freedom.

Robert Wenzel: Twitter Adds Content Warning to Wall Street Journal Op-Ed That Discusses Critical Race Theory

Jacob Hornberger: Reform versus Abolition.

And Ginny Garner: Sheriffs, Police Officers, Pastors, and Attorneys Are Fighting Covid Orders

Are You Reading This? You Go to Gulag!

James Corbett: COVID-911: From Homeland Security to Biosecurity (Important point: “The ‘terrorist’ label is replaced by the ‘asymptomatic carrier’ label and all the machinery of the police state is wielded against everyone who opposes the biosecurity takeover.”)

Ron Paul: Question ‘The Science’? Go To Gulag!

Becky Akers: More Evidence That the USSA Has Become China

Caitlin Johnstone: On Vote Shaming: 21 Ways Supporting The US Establishment Is Worse Than Voting Third Party.

Jim Davies: Anti-Fascist Fascists.

Paul Craig Roberts: The COVID Deception.

Eric Boehm: Rand Paul, Tulsi Gabbard, Thomas Massie, Ron Wyden Join Forces To Unplug the President’s ‘Internet Kill Switch’

Kevin Gosztola: Prosecutors’ Password-Cracking Conspiracy Theory Against Julian Assange Unravels at Extradition Trial.

Robert Wenzel: On Recruiting Politicians to the Libertarian Cause

Jason Ditz: TikTok Isn’t A Threat To Our Privacy And Security, But The NSA Is

Jon Rappoport: Could the COVID Vaccine Be Canceled Before the First Injection?

Joseph Mercola: What You Need To Know About the Act of 1986

Laurence Vance: Time To End Ridiculous Prostitution Laws

Jacob Hornberger: So Much for Income Tax Privacy.

Richard Ebeling: Stakeholder Fascism Means More Loss of Liberty

Jefferson Morley: ‘Last Narc’: Did the CIA Do Business With Drug Traffickers?

And Charles Burris: Sunrise Exposed — More Evidence of the Planned Chaos and Strategy of Tension Leading to the November Color Revolution Aimed at Destroying the American Republic

Vaccines: Your Body, Their Choice?

James Corbett discusses possible mandatory vaccines. Like with COVID? (the thing with a case fatality rate of .1%)

On the YouTube page: “Stripped of its contextual baggage, the phrase ‘My Body, My Choice’ makes a compelling rallying cry because it conveys a fundamental truth that we all innately understand: I have the claim to my own body and what is done to it. So why, then, are we being asked to believe that when it comes to vaccinations during a declared pandemic it is ‘Your Body, Their Choice’?”

More Fallout from “Libertarian” Party Elites Snubbing the Grassroots Voters

As I mentioned before, the elites of the “Libertarian” Party held a virtual convention in which they decided to nominate Jo Jorgensen for President, even though in state primaries Jacob Hornberger won many more votes from the actual LP voters. “Libertarian Party voters in primaries gave Jacob Hornberger 9,035 votes with 7 state wins, while they gave Jo Jorgensen 5,034 votes with 2 state wins,” I wrote.

And then I wrote about Jorgensen attending a Black Lives Matter candlelight vigil, and she tweeted, “It is not enough to be passively not racist, we must be actively anti-racist.” Of course, I’ll bet she doesn’t include being actively anti- anti-white racist. If anyone does that, oppose anti-white racism, then one will be labeled “white supremacist,” etc. So much for equality.

But now, Robert Wenzel has posted or reposted a tweet with a photo showing Jorgensen elbow-bumping her VP nominee, Spike Cohen. The horrible and horrifying thing about that is they are wearing those face masks whose only purpose is to show obedience, compliance, and submission to government authority. That is soooo un-libertarian.

Libertarianism is about the Non-Aggression Principle. We oppose the initiation of aggression. It is also about self-ownership, private property rights and freedom of association, in my view.

What is government? Government is by its very nature, aggression. The government has assumed for itself the authority over the lives and property of the people. The government owns the people, frankly, and the government — that is, its bureaucrats and their enforcers — can order you to do this or that, can arrest you, drag you out of your home, terrorize you, steal from you, etc. with impunity. They own you.

So, when we have political candidates who supposedly represent the “Libertarian” message, i.e., the anti-aggression anti-interventionism message, when they show themselves wearing the very symbols of submission to government control and authority, and the very symbols of the suppression of speech and dissent, they show themselves to be not particularly libertarians, or perhaps just clueless.

Yes, they should have the freedom to wear the mask if they want to. But they shouldn’t for the aforementioned reasons, but also because the masks are unhealthy, and shown to not prevent transmission of viruses. The sole purpose of the masks is control.

The LP conventioneers should have gone with the voters’ decision to nominate Jacob Hornberger.

On Voting Libertarian in 2020

I had written previously about the Libertarian Party’s virtual convention, in which the conventioneers decided on Jo Jorgensen to be their LP nominee for President for 2020. And I was thinking of writing more about Jo Jorgensen, even though Jacob Hornberger received many more votes than she did in the state LP primaries, and Hornberger should have gotten the nomination. But the latest with Jorgensen is a reminder that I will not be doing that.

The upcoming U.S. Presidential election will not be legitimate anyway, no matter the outcome, no matter who “wins.” We will now have “mail-in voting” (a.k.a. mail-in cheating) throughout the USSA as well as “early voting” (a.k.a. early cheating) in many states. I think that any chance of these elections having any bit of legitimacy is finished. Add to that the tech companies censoring, de-platforming, and silencing anyone who opposes “social justice” warriorism and race-based and gender-based identity politics.

That is what daily life in Amerika is all about now. The President (Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump) continues to authorize drone strikes that kill and murder mainly innocent civilians overseas, that means nothing to millions and millions of schmucks in Amerika. The President continues with the unwinnable “war on drugs” slaughtering and falsely imprisoning and/or otherwise causing the deaths of many young black males. The morons all across the country don’t care about those things. And the idiots on the other side are obsessed with the National Anthem (a horrible song!) and the American Flag, that Bozo in the White House wants a law to protect, like it’s a human being.

So the Libertarian Party giving the nomination to Jo Jorgensen when it was Jacob Hornberger who, rightly, received the most votes in the state primaries, what a joke, that Libertarian Party. They are just as much elitist hacks as the Democrat and Republican party racket.

The latest from Jo Jorgensen? She attended a “Black Lives Matter” candlelight vigil. Okay, so she’s misguided and ignorant. So? However, she tweeted: “It is not enough to be passively not racist, we must be actively anti-racist.

Robert Wenzel writes:

Why can’t someone be passively not racist? For that matter, why is it a concern of libertarians if someone is a racist but does not violate the non-aggression principle?

Why must libertarians be actively anti-racist? Why should it be demanded of us, under the libertarian banner, to be an active participant in a black public relations effort?

Really, lady, I have enough of my own problems.

I have explained before that I think racists are clowns but if these clowns are not violating the non-aggression principle why is it a concern of libertarians qua libertarians?

Further, Jorgensen, may or may not realize it, but she is jumping on the bandwagon that is being run by very shrewd Marxist revolutionaries who want to destroy capitalism.

Even if I thought there was some merit to the BLM movement, which I don’t, I would stay far away from this effort. The top operators know how to take advantage of alliances. As one of the founders of the Black Lives Matter organization put it, “We are trained Marxists.”

If you are not part of the inner circle, you are a useful idiot to them.  Jorgensen is not part of the inner circle. She is falling into a trap fighting to eliminate “systemic racism” that doesn’t exist (Not to be confused with a few random racists who do exist). BLM  is a front group, a tool, of some very strategically-skilled power-hungry communists.

What the hell is Jorgensen thinking?

Answer: She’s not.

Now, I’m not the biggest fan of Pat Buchanan, but he recently wrote about the “Black Lives Matter” phenomenon, in his article, The New “Systemic Racism” That Is Coming. Basically there are activists in the USSA who want to erase the idea of “not discriminating against someone based on race,” as well as erase that from various state constitutions and probably the Civil Rights Act, so they can institutionalize discrimination against whites and Asians.

But the “Black Lives Matter” organization is led by self-admitted Marxists who don’t believe in freedom, equal justice, due process, and a “color-blind society.” They also don’t believe in private property and freedom of association, freedom of thought and conscience and free exchange, and the libertarian non-aggression principle. They are Marxists.

People who are “libertarians” should not stand with such an organization that is opposed to all the important libertarian principles. And that’s my view on that.

So Jo Jorgensen is now insisting and demanding that we be “actively anti-racist.” Right, Jo. When these race-obsessed activists include anti-white racism as a part of being “anti-racist,” then maybe I’ll support them. When we have millions of white people who haven’t harmed anyone, who haven’t “discriminated against black people” in all their lives, then I would say that they, too, have a right to not be the target of anti-white racism just as much as innocent black people have a right to not be the target of anti-black racism. Right?

But anyway, the Libertarian Party reinforced its more recent moniker as “a joke” when they selected Jo Jorgensen as their 2020 Presidential nominee, even though Jacob Hornberger got many more votes in the primaries.