Skip to content

Category: Decentralization

Instead of “Packing the Supreme Court,” Let’s UNpack the Supreme Court

OMG, Schumer, Nadler and Markey want to “pack the Supreme Court,” by adding 4 more Democrat “Justices” to the existing 9 Supreme Bureaucrats. They want to do this because they really believe that the current Court has a 6-3 “conservative” majority! Yes, they really believe that.

The reason that the Sheeplecrats want to “pack the Supreme Court” is because they are too impatient to wait for a “Justice” to retire (or die) and be replaced by one that’s more to their liking.

So they impatiently drool to ram their dictatorial mandates and tax-thefts down the throats of the people more quickly by getting a faux “Supreme” Court to rubber-stamp their agenda. And with HR 1 all future elections will belong to them, these thieves, cheaters, fraudsters, hooligans, barbarians and shysters.

And it isn’t just Democrats who are the criminals and thieves and extortionists, the Republicans are bad, too. (See Laurence Vance’s articles exposing the conservatives and Republicans‘ corruption, ignorance and hypocrisy, for example, when it comes to their proclaiming to promote “limited government,” “free markets” and “liberty.” i.e. they’re FOS just as much as the Democrats and “liberals.”)

No, rather than packing the Supreme Commissars, I say, let’s UNpack them, by just getting rid of the whole thing. They really suck, when you get right down to it.

The 9 robed goons are unreliable, unsupportive of the Constitution, incapable of defending liberty, and they are just all around nothing more than Soviet-like apparatchiks, quite frankly.

The truth is, what we have at the top of the U.S. so-called judicial system is a Supreme Swamp, because that is exactly what those “Justices” are, just another part of the Swamp in Washington.

The Supreme Court rarely comes to the side of the rights of the individual and private property against the threats and aggressions of the government and police.

For example, while some of the current “Justices” were not there 10 years ago, at that time the High Swamp high-fived the jailing and strip searching of arrestees who were abducted for non-arrestable offenses, such as walking a dog sans leash or for unpaid parking tickets.

The Republican appointees were the ones who voted to approve such criminal treatment of presumably innocent folks. Hence, “Rethuglicans.”

But “liberals” are also useless when it comes to civil liberties. Also around that time the Court rubber-stamped the government’s drug gestapo breaking into people’s home, terrorizing them and abducting them because police smelled marijuana and heard a toilet flushing, implying people were “destroying evidence,” even though such evidence was not that of an actual crime with an actual victim.

And obviously with an 8-1 decision, several of the “liberals” on the High Swamp agreed with the usual conservative authoritarian neanderthals, that the drug war police state is so important that we must allow government police to criminally and violently break into a home and terrorize and abduct innocent people for ingesting non-approved drugs. “Liberals” Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer joined the “conservative” neanderthals in this one, with Ruth Bader Ginsburg actually citing that dusty ol’ Fourth Amendment in her lone dissent.

Sorry, morons, the real and only legitimate ruling to that case is to rule the entire drug war unconstitutional, because the government involving itself in drugs is not authorized by the U.S. Constitution. And, does the individual own one’s own life and body or does the government own one’s life and body? Duh, Elena, Sonia, Clarence, et al.

The 9 robed Swamp Supremes are loathsome and corrupt, and are the lap dogs for the fascists in the White House and the communists in CONgress, and they are useless. Bought and paid for, or otherwise bribed to do the fascists bidding as well as being obedient State-worshiping ignoramuses, that is what these people are.

Chief “Justice” (sic) John Roberts suddenly switched his vote of ruling the ObamaCare law unconstitutional to his joining the Obama apparatchiks to approve the ObamaCare law and the individual mandate. Was Roberts threatened, or blackmailed? NSA whistleblower Russ Tice told how NSA abuses made high public officials susceptible to blackmail, and other NSA whistleblowers including Edward Snowden and William Binney backed those assertions.

They will be even worse now when they see government officials and juries deciding cases out of fear of being attacked by social activist thugs engaged in “peaceful” protests, and out of fear of their homes being burned to the ground.

And the Supreme Sheeple then approved ObamaCare a second time in 2015, and its subsidies, further empowering the criminal IRS. “The Affordable Care Act is here to stay,” said Barack Obomber, reinforced later by traitor John McCain who voted against repealing it.

The High Supreme Swamp also ruled against the Fifth Amendment in its Kelo decision to allow local governments to steal private property away from the owner and redistribute it over to other private citizens for financial profits. That was a no-brainer, but John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, and the only remaining one of them left now Stephen Breyer thought otherwise.

And Scalia? An “Originalist”? Heh. Scalia of course sided with the drug war police state in the aforementioned decision, is questionable on the 2nd Amendment, rejected private property rights and self-ownership in favor of collectivist moral legislating, and obediently accepted the government’s bogus war on terror to justify violating the due process rights of detainees. (And, while he wasn’t endorsing internment camps, he even pointed out that internment camps à la World War II could return again in good ol’ USS of A.)

And Amy Coney Barrett? What a disappointment, even before she crawled up to the High Slimy Bench. In a lower court decision, Barrett sided with the other two fascists in her three-judge panel of the 7th Circus approving Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D-McDonald’s) unconstitutional Covid lockdown orders and limits on gatherings.

As I pointed out in an earlier blog, constitutionalist pastor Chuck Baldwin noted that based on her previous opinions Barrett will probably rubber-stamp the COVID police state and forced vaccines, and probably the surveillance state as well.

All these Supreme Court “Justices” (sic) defend the police state, the national security state, and seem to obediently believe the government’s false flags and fabrications to justify enslaving and imprisoning the population to “protect” them from the foreign bogey man, and from their own vices.

Brett Kavanaugh. Yech. Total authoritarian apparatchik police statist swamp creature. Included in lower court rulings Kavanaugh voted in favor of CIA covering up of the JFK assassination, and other national security state interests.

I wrote in an earlier blog on Kavanaugh’s deference to the national security state regarding the bulk collection of telephony metadata. This Cato article quotes Kavanaugh’s lower court opinion from 2015:

The Fourth Amendment allows governmental searches and seizures without individualized suspicion when the Government demonstrates a sufficient “special need” – that is, a need beyond the normal need for law enforcement – that outweighs the intrusion on individual liberty

The Fourth Amendment says nothing about there being a “special need” of government law enforcement that “outweighs” the right to be secure.

Does the Fourth Amendment say regarding our right to be secure, “except for a special need of law enforcement”? Nope.

Kavanaugh writes (with my comments inserted):

In my view, that critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy occasioned by this program. The Government’s program does not capture the content of communications [Yes it does, with phone calls and emails as well!], but rather the time and duration of calls, and the numbers called.

Besides being ignorant of the feds’ ongoing criminal intrusions against innocent people, Kavanaugh also cites “drug testing of students, roadblocks to detect drunk drivers, border checkpoints, and security screening at airports” as examples of allowable violations of the Fourth Amendment.

In a different case, while the Court’s “liberals” in the majority voted to protect the right of the people and their cell phone data to not be tracked, the neanderthal “conservatives” who love the police state say, no, we think that gestapo Amerikan police goons must be permitted to track people’s cell phone data without a warrant, without reasonable suspicion, because we really don’t support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and its Fourth Amendment, as we swore an oath to do. (And that case included Neil Gorsuch with the other conservatards who love the police state. So much for that guy.)

So, the Government Supremacists cite “exigent circumstances” when they know the gubmint goons are violating someone’s Fourth Amendment rights but they don’t care, such as in the case of permitting police to draw blood from an unconscious motorist who had already parked his van and was walking about. So, the Supreme Swampers themselves are goons and thugs, in my view. The Supreme Thugs is really what they are.

But back to Supreme Thug Brett Kavanaugh, in at least 3 “national security” (sic) cases Kavanaugh rubber-stamped the holding of terrorism suspects without charge or actual suspicion or evidence at the Guantanamo prison. (al-Bihani v. Obama, Uthman v. Obama, and Omar v. McHugh.) He might as well be an employee of the CIA. So, what if Gubmint suspected you conservatives of “insurrection” or “domestic terrorism,” for example, you want their goons abducting you without evidence or warrants and to be imprisoned indefinitely? You want that? Duh, conservatives.

Conservatives defended Kavanaugh in his nomination battle, but they don’t realize that Kavanaugh is a staunch “social justice” defender of Title IX. As he stated before the Senate Judiciary Committee, “Title IX helped make girls’ and women’s sports equal. And I see that law’s legacy every night when I walk into my house, as my daughters are getting back from lacrosse or basketball or hockey practice.” So obviously he is clueless as to the abuses of Title IX to enable false accusations of hapless males especially in college. Duh, “conservatives.”

Speaking of “social justice” (sic), the Supreme Swamp also shows what unprincipled gutless wonders they are in their attempting to defend a baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding, but for the wrong reasons, a decision based on anything but the private property rights they should be upholding but seem to have no clue as to what that actually is.

And why didn’t the Supreme Bureaucrats overturn the “Defense of Marriage Act,” or any of the states’ impositions or state referendums on protecting or forbidding gay marriage? Why do legislatures or CONgress get themselves involved with the people’s private matters? As I wrote in this article, you own your own life and have a right to form whatever contracts with others you want, as long as it’s voluntary. Marriage is none of the State’s damn business!

The gutless Supreme Apparatchiks also showed how they view freedom of the Press by declining to hear journalist James Risen’s case on protecting a confidential source. They obediently and pathologically defend the national security state no matter what. But, they merely reflect the Amerikan True Believers. Oh, well.

And on freedom of speech, the “Justices” (sic) all oppose free speech when the other Party is the one being opposed, with socialism-dreaming “liberal” Elena Kagan possibly being the worst of them.

I’m sure the sheeple Democrats and Republicans would go running to the Supreme Nannies to get their permission on whether the people of the states can make use of the 10th Amendment to nullify federal edicts.

But, real Americans will nullify fascist orders and intrusions whether the Supreme Bureaucrats like it or not.

Tom Woods wrote a terrific book on the history of nullification in America and how it should be used currently:  Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century. Woods addresses objections to nullification on this page. (And see this, this, and this.)

I wish I could advocate “packing the Supreme Court” with libertarians and voluntaryists who believe in the non-aggression principle, private property rights, self-ownership, freedom of contract and freedom of association, but that’s not realistic.

No, the answer is to UNpack the Supreme Court and “throw the bums out,” along with the rest of the horrible central planning apparatus in criminal Washington. You bet.

News and Commentary

Michael Maharrey: West Virginia House Passes Bill to Ban Enforcement of Federal Gun Control: Past, Present and Future.

Brandon Smith: The Illegal Immigration Crisis: It’s All About New Covid Lockdowns.

Gary Barnett: Poisonous Experimental ‘Covid’ Injection Trials on Infants Have Begun: They Should All Be Imprisoned!

Jon Rappoport: Rejecting Rockefeller Germ Theory Once and For All.

Charles Burris: National Socialism and the Occult

Paul Joseph Watson: Facebook Scrubs Page Showing Supermarket Shooter Was Anti-Trump, Pro-Refugee Activist.

And The Last Refuge: Media Starting to Admit Federal Prosecutors Have Scant Evidence Against January 6th DC Protestors as Judges Start Asking Questions.

News and Commentary via Totalitarian USSA

Peter Quinones: So, Tell Me, ‘Do You Hate the State?’

Becky Akers: The USSA Captures More Political Prisoners

Martin Armstrong: There are Many Reports from Around the World of People Becoming Seriously Ill After the Covid Vaccine.

Robert Wenzel: Why Big Pharma Beneficiaries are Behind the Transgender Movement

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr: Eagle Scout Sues Merck, Alleges Gardasil HPV Vaccine Destroyed His Life.

Brett Wilkins: Rights Advocates Alarmed by US Spy Agency’s Purchase of Warrantless Phone Location Data.

Vasko Kohlmayer: When Thieves Seek a Lock on Power: The Democrat Election Fraud Act

Paul Craig Roberts: The Media Destroyed America.

James Bovard: Federal Censorship Protects Leviathan’s Crimes.

Charles Burris: CIA Presstitutes and Regime Stenographers in the Mainstream Media

Big League Politics: MeWe Goes Big Tech Authoritarian, Opts for Political Censorship.

Jeffrey Herbener: Small States, Global Economy: Is Empire Necessary?

And Pete Eyre: Remembering Carl Watner.

More News and Commentary

Jacob Hornberger: Immigration Pipe Dream at the Los Angeles Times.

Wendy McElroy: “Victim-Centered” Justice Is a Threat to Due Process.

Tho Bishop: Trump’s Potential Legacy: 50 Million+ Enemies of the State

Charles Burris: ‘Government Becomes God’: Jacobin’s Satirical Cover Literally Idolizing Biden Strikes Nerve

Ryan McMaken: No, the Chinese Won’t Invade America If Secessionists Succeed.

And Veronique De Rugy: Joe Biden’s Plan for Big Government.

The Swamp Wins. The Criminals Have Won. Fake News Is the “Truth” Now.

This has been a very stressful time, with the Covidiocy, the election steal, and the media propagandists giving fake news that a lot of bamboozled people really trust and believe.

It isn’t just that Kommie-la Harris and Biden were confirmed by Congress to have stolen the adequate number of electoral votes to be sworn in to power on January 20th, by way of fraud, mail-in cheating and voting machine-tampering. No, the issue with me now is that everything I’m hearing on brain-dead “news” media is just not the reality, as they had been doing with this whole election fiasco (‘no evidence of election fraud”), the entire Covid scamdemic, the all-year Antifa/BLM rioting, looting, arson and destroying whole cities (“peaceful protests”), and for 4 years the evidence-free “Trump-Russia collusions” and Ukraine-phone call-impeachment that were also made-up.

That is, what we’re hearing on the “news” are mainly fake news, propaganda and government press releases. The social media platforms have been censoring the truth and disseminating lies just like mainstream media.

On the current “Trump supporters storming Capitol Hill and rioting, smashing windows and breaking into the building and people’s offices” narrative, what we are not hearing on brain-dead media is about the Antifa/BLM agents provocateurs infiltrating the many thousands of actual Trump supporters who were there to legitimately protest the stolen election.

And now we have all the condemnation of Donald Trump for allegedly encouraging or inciting his supporters to commit the above violent acts, which Trump didn’t do, as an insurrection, or sedition. Fake insurrection and fake sedition, that is.

All the idiots out there including former AG Bill Baaa and other Rethugs condemning Trump without even listening to what he said at his rally yesterday, or reading the transcript. They are ignorant fools. The Swamp contains not only psychopaths but just plain mentally deficient morons. In no way did Trump possibly do anything close to “inciting” what happened at Crapitol Hill.

So once again the brain-dead media are lying or they are just ignorant, too, or both.

And I’m not a Trump supporter, except for the tax cuts. I just wanted to put in that disclaimer. My main point is to expose the truth about a situation that “news” media won’t do, or can’t do.

So once again the Washington apparatchiks a.k.a. Swamp want to invoke the 25th Amendment or impeach The Donald on false charges of inciting riots or insurrection, that he didn’t do. The Swamp are retarded, folks.

It’s been 5 long years of Trump saying “Drain the Swamp,” and the Swamp reacting as a Swamp will react, by making things up to frame Trump on Russia collusions and Ukraine, and on and on, until when it’s time for his reelection that the Swamp knows will happen, they get desperate and make up this Covid scamdemic to use to get people to be afraid to vote in person so they will want mail-in voting so the activists who want to impose their communist coup in Amerika can do mail-in cheating which is exactly what they did, in addition to the sabotaging of the voting machines to flip votes from Trump to Biden the Alzheimer’s patient. (Did 80 million people really vote for an Alzheimer’s patient? No, they did not. That is why Kommie-la will rule very soon.)

And don’t you dare even utter “Drain the Swamp”! They’ll getchya!

So that is where we are now. You can believe what you want. And chances are, if you only get your “news” from the mainstream i.e. brain-dead media then you probably believe what they have been telling you especially about this election, Trump and Biden, Covid, Russia collusions, and all the rest.

I heard one of the talk radio personalities saying that they the Trump supporters need to now divorce themselves from the Rethuglican Party and form a new political party. Hmm, that was sure a good idea with the Orwellian-named “Libertarian” Party, or Ross Perot’s “Reform” Party. Crickets.

Good luck, Trumpsters, with your Third Party. Sadly, I think they are delusional.

And they are also deluded in their America-worship, this “America-First” sentimentality. I personally am for Freedom First, quite frankly. This experiment called America, which is now Amerika, is a failed experiment. The sooner the nationalists, Trump-supporters, conservatives and other sentimentalists wake up and realize that, the better. I have been saying for over 10 years here that the only way to restore freedom in our society, and in fact maintain this as a civilized society, is to decentralize.

Nullification and secession are good, but we need a full decentralization here. That is because government central planning doesn’t work. And the bigger the political unit, such as in our USSA now, the more that government central planning won’t work! So either people face that fact and do the decentralization thing now, and sooner rather than later, or otherwise the entire society will further collapse into further chaos, violence, destruction and real impoverishment. That means getting rid of Washington entirely. The whole apparatus there. At the very least, that is. And then each state can decentralize as well.

People need to realize that this territory is just too big to be all one single country. Hundreds of thousands of square miles in area, it’s 3 million square miles in fact, and a population of over 300 million. Too big.

For a civilized society to actually function and live in peace and prosperity, we need the society to be based on private property, private property rights, and respect for the ideas of self-ownership and the non-aggression principle, freedom of thought and conscience and freedom of association. Self-governance. But right now we do not have private property or those freedoms. Ultimately, government bureaucrats are the owners of “your” property (material property and your “own” body, as well as real estate), that’s Washington DC bureaucrats, your state bureaucrats, and your local town or city bureaucrats as well.

There are so many other points to make here, such as regarding the cultural Marxism, censorship and the Great Purges we will see in Kommie-la’s Amerika, but I just don’t have that much time now. Obviously, with all the election fraud schemes in place now, I don’t think any election from this point forward will be honest or fair. Especially U.S. presidential elections will always be rigged under such circumstances.

So many people now are totally corrupt. In politics and government, in the medical cartel, “education,” media and many corporations. Society is extremely corrupt now.

If we didn’t have government control over education, the income tax-theft (i.e. institutionalized involuntary servitude), redistribution of wealth such as for political parties, doctors and hospitals, and other fascist-communist schemes, then the people who are in the “journalism” field probably would be more honest, less lazy-minded, and not political operatives and apparatchiks for government slave masters, and thus more of the masses would actually know the truth about elections, so-called viruses, and more of the masses would not be ignorant and bamboozled as they are now.

News and Commentary from the “New Normal” Soviet Amerika

Jon Rappoport: Why Do Hypocritical Officials Violate Their Own COVID rules?

James Bovard: The Official Whitewash of the Killing of Duncan Lemp.

Ludwig von Mises: Socialism vs. Economic Freedom. In a capitalist system, the consumers are the boss, not the State.

Phillip Magness: Lockdowns are Killing Young Adults.

Matt Agorist: Police Keep Secret List of Kids with Bad Grades Labeling Them “Potential Criminals”

Prosecution of Assange Is an Attack on Our Own Humanity.

Fraser Myers: Lockdown: a Deadly, Failed Experiment.

Becky Akers: Face Masks: New Year, Old War.

Big League Politics: Reigning U.S. ‘Teacher of the Year’ Urges ‘Heroes’ to Commit Terror Attacks Against Republican Lawmakers.

Hannah Cox: What Is Section 230 and Why Do Trump and His Allies Want to Repeal It?

Joseph Mercola: COVID Conflicts: Asymptomatic Testing, Lack of Danger to Kids

And Gregory Bresiger: Decentralize New York City!

On the Right of the People to Nullify Federal Diktats

It looks like we will have a turn to the left with more socialism if Joe Biden gets in power, which means President Kamala Harris, and probably AOC as the Speech and Thought Commissar who will distribute a long list of those the administration has determined to be “racists,” etc, i.e. anyone who disagrees with the Regime.

So this will be a time in which those who believe in the freedom and principles of the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights will have to seriously consider, if not full secession and genuine independence then nullification of the further federal edicts that Biden or Harris will attempt to shove down our throats. (And this isn’t just because of the illegitimacy of their presidency given that they imposed a coup via a massive organized racketeering operation of fraud and vote tampering and fabricating.)

To get a good idea on the right and importance of nullification, I recommend Tom Woods’s book from 2010, Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century. Here it is at the Mises Institute store, and Amazon.

I have quoted before from this blog post by Tom Woods and will again, in his explanation of the relationship between the states and the federal government:

If you and I give a third person (call him Person C) a limited power of attorney to help govern our affairs, and that person oversteps the boundaries outlined in the contract we signed, who gets to decide if Person C is in violation of the contract? Is it Person C himself? Or is it you and I, the people who wrote and signed the limited power of attorney in the first place? Likewise, the states, as the principals to the constitutional compact, have a far better logical claim to be the judges of constitutionality than their agent, the federal government.

In Woods’s Liberty Classroom page on nullification, he writes:

1) The states preceded the Union.  The Declaration of Independence speaks of “free and independent states” that “have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.” The British acknowledged the independence not of a single blob, but of individual states, which they proceeded to list one by one. Article II of the Articles of Confederation says the states “retain their sovereignty, freedom, and independence”; they must have enjoyed that sovereignty in the past in order for them to “retain” it in 1781 when the Articles were officially adopted.  The ratification of the Constitution was accomplished not by a single, national vote, but by the individual ratifications of the various states, each assembled in convention.

2) In the American system no government is sovereign.  The peoples of the states are the sovereigns.  It is they who apportion powers between themselves, their state governments, and the federal government.  In doing so they are not impairing their sovereignty in any way. To the contrary, they are exercising it.

3) Since the peoples of the states are the sovereigns, then when the federal government exercises a power of dubious constitutionality on a matter of great importance, it is they themselves who are the proper disputants, as they review whether their agent was intended to hold such a power.  No other arrangement makes sense.  No one asks his agent whether the agent has or should have such-and-such power.  In other words, the very nature of sovereignty, and of the American system itself, is such that the sovereigns must retain the power to restrain the agent they themselves created.  James Madison explains this clearly in the famous Virginia Report of 1800.

There is further information on that Nullification resource page. And Woods answers some of the objections to Nullification, such as the claims that it violates the Constitution’s supremacy clause, that it doesn’t appear in the Constitution, that the Supreme Court ruled against the idea, that it was used by the southern states to defend slavery, and other objections.

So of course people have the right to live their lives however they want, as long as they are peaceful. Given that the Declaration of Independence recognizes the unalienable right of each individual to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, then of course the people of the states have a right to nullify federal diktats.

For example, healthcare. As I wrote in my June of 2011 article on disobeying dictators,

Now, by “disobeying dictators,” I am not advocating violence, but only that people live their lives as they see fit, as long as they do not intrude on anyone else’s equal right to do the same with their lives. So there comes a time when civil disobedience is in order. By civil disobedience, I mean acting in defiance of government-imposed rules and dictates that have nothing to do with protecting life, liberty and property. This includes individual- or state-nullification of federal orders. I believe in the Non-Aggression Principle and oppose the use of aggression as an initiated means toward an end.

Like in the old Soviet Union, Obama’s government-controlled medical scheme will not only be harmful medically, but the increasing police state we are experiencing will be used to enforce the controls, and also will be used against individuals who show dissent from the government’s authoritarian dictates.

We The People don’t need all that, and we don’t want it. We want freedom and peace. (At least I do.)

Now, what would happen if doctor’s offices, hospitals, medical equipment manufacturers, drug and supplement makers, and insurers just decided to do their business with their consumers – honestly and peacefully, and without aggression or fraud – and totally ignore federal regulations, mandates, fees, licensure laws and other intrusions? Frankly, those intrusions’ only real purpose is to protect established physicians and businesses’ profits from prospective competitors and start-ups. (The medical establishment was already corrupt well before ObamaCare.)

The contracts involved in the relationships between doctors or other medical providers and patients, or between insurers and patients, are private contracts, and third parties such as government bureaucrats sticking their big noses into those private contracts are committing acts of criminality, of trespassing, in my opinion.

Acts of nullification are necessary for Americans to be better served in their medical needs. With freedom, the consumers would determine what is needed, not the government, and the producers would serve the consumers – quality of medical care would then rise and the prices would fall.

So I definitely recommend Tom Woods’s book on nullification, which people should send to their state legislators and even their U.S. congressmen and senators.

On the Amazon page it quotes “from the inside flap”:

Unconstitutional laws are pouring out of Washington…but we can stop them.

Just ask Thomas Jefferson. There is a “rightful remedy” to federal power grabs–it’s called Nullification.

In Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century, historian and New York Times bestselling author Thomas E. Woods, Jr. explains not only why nullification is the constitutional tool the Founders envisioned, but how it works–and has already been employed in cases ranging from upholding the First Amendment to knocking down slave laws before the Civil War. In Nullification, Woods shows:

* How the states were meant to be checks against federal tyranny–and how a growing roster of governors and state attorneys general are recognizing they need to become that again
* Why the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution reinforces the rights of states to nullify unconstitutional laws
* Why it was left to the states to uphold the simple principle that an unconstitutional law is no law at all
* Why, without nullification, ordinary Americans will continue to suffer the oppression of unjust, unconstitutional laws
* PLUS thorough documentation of how the Founding Fathers believed nullification could be applied

Nullification is not just a book–it could become a movement to restore the proper constitutional limits of the federal government. Powerful, provocative, and timely, Nullification is sure to stir debate and become a constitutional handbook for all liberty-loving Americans.

We already have a lot of federal bureaucracies and agencies which shouldn’t exist and should be abolished along with all of their regulations and fees and fines. None of them is authorized by the U.S. Constitution, and if they exist, then the people have a right to nullify them. Of course, it is helpful if such nullification is made official in state laws by the state legislatures.

Trump Attorney Sydney Powell Details Vote Fraud Accusations

You’ve probably heard that the Trump campaign has been accusing the Democrats of stealing the election with massive vote fraud schemes, flipping votes from Trump to Biden, bringing in coolers and suitcases full of “mail-in” ballots for Biden, etc., etc. The software for some of the machines used is by a company called “Dominion” which apparently is highly suspect.

In this video, Trump campaign attorney Sydney Powell goes over some of the details for “Greg Kelly Reports” on Newsmax TV.

However, Jon Rappoport and Tucker Carlson are asking Sydney Powell to provide evidence of her accusations. It seems to me that she and other attorney Rudy Giuliani have presented a lot of evidence, including witness sworn affidavits. Although, there is a lot of circumstantial evidence such as vote tallies occurring showing numbers that could not be possible statistically, and the sudden stopping of vote counting late election night after it was clear that Trump was winning by a wide margin, followed by a sudden increase in Biden votes appearing out of no where.

But these elections are futile, anyway. When will people learn that central planning doesn’t work? The larger the country and the larger the central government the more chaos and dysfunction you will have. All the power-seekers and power-grabbers and psychopaths are driven to the central power structure in Washington. The country needs to decentralize. I have explained all that several times here, including in this article.

News and Commentary in Orwellian, Totalitarian, Moron Amerika

Tomek McGrath: We Have Abandoned the Elderly to a Fate Worse Than Death.

Joseph Mercola: Why COVID-19 Testing Is a Tragic Waste

Activist Post: The Big Tech Exodus Has Begun — Join Us!

Jacob Hornberger: The Pentagon and CIA Might Decide Who Is President

Laurence Vance: Serving Self or Serving the Country?

Laura Gottesdiener: The Children of Fallujah: The Medical Mystery at the Heart of the Iraq War.

L. Reichard White: Changing Hood Ornaments

Jonathan Turley: Big League Censorship? Michigan Attorney General Threatens Criminal Prosecution Over Posting Of Video Alleging Voter Fraud.

Daisy Luther: The Second Lockdown Is Here.

Scott Shackford: If Trump Ends Term by Pulling Troops Out of Afghanistan, That’s Good for America.

Allan Stevo: Covid Communism, and Compliance

And Charles Burris: Restoring the Principles of ’98 and the Compact Theory of Government for the Next Four Years

More News and Commentary on the Amerikan Banana Republik

Jeff Deist: What Will It Take for Americans to Consider Breaking Up?

John Whitehead: America After the Election: A Few Hard Truths About the Things That Won’t Change.

The Last Refuge: Michigan GOP Identifies Software “Glitch” in Voting System – One County Had 6,000 Wrongly Assigned Biden Votes Corrected To Trump When Fixed…

Pepe Escobar: How the Presidential Election Was Stolen

Joakim Book: Lockdowners and “the Desire to Dominate”

Jon Rappoport: Fauci States Covid Test Has Fatal Flaw.

Paul Craig Roberts: Evidence Mounts of a Stolen Election.

Doug Bandow: Is Mike Pompeo the Worst Secretary of State in History?

Laurence Vance: Amy Coney Barrett on the Constitutionality of Social Security.

Ludwig von Mises: Socialists Have Never Shown How They Could Increase the Standard of Living. (1919)

Jacob Hornberger: Libertarian Reformers vs. the Non-Aggression Principle.

Newsmax: Dick Morris: State Legislatures Can Declare Trump Winner.

And NY Post: AOC Facing Heat for Wanting to Archive Online Posts by ‘Trump Sycophants’

Some Post-Election Comments

I’m posting this around noon, with no word on who the next puppet will be, Trump or Biden (i.e. Harris).

The final vote tally is not yet ready, but it looks like Libertarian Party presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen is getting roughly 1 to 2% of the vote. She might as well be Lyndon LaRouche. In 2016 Gary Johnson the pothead got roughly 3.27% of the vote which was the highest ever for the LP.

I think that, had the hacks and apparatchiks of the “Libertarian” Party gone with Jacob Hornberger as their presidential nominee (the one the actual voters in the state primaries overwhelmingly voted for), there would have been a lot more enthusiasm among many in the Liberty movement, probably better publicity and more support. I am not saying that Jacob could have taken that many votes away from Trump and Biden to get much more over 3 or 4%. But, he was the better, more consistently libertarian and principled candidate.

But nooo, the hacks and apparatchiks of the “Libertarian” Party snubbed the voters of the primaries and went with the “social justice” crap, this obsession with gender and race that “social justice warriors” seem to have.

I would definitely support a 2024 LP candidate Jacob Hornberger, who will be only 74 then. Hell, I’d support Ron Paul at age 89 in 2024 for President. But, it looks like we probably won’t have an America anymore by 2024, because the Democrats and Republicans have turned the country into Amerika, and getting worse.

My preference instead is to just get rid of Washington, D.C., because it has outlasted its usefulness, whatever usefulness it ever had (which is to say, none). Decentralization is the answer to all this.

I know, I know. It is unrealistic to hope that someday the libertarian message will get across to the masses, when the government controls the education system and the mass media. That was apparent way back in 1988 after I voted for Libertarian Party nominee Ron Paul and then saw that he received just a few hundred thousand votes. The “news” media didn’t really report on his candidacy. There was no change in the reporting from the “news” media in 1992 with that election’s terrible LP nominee, Andre Marrou.

Back then, the “news” media would declare: “There are only Republican and Democrat, and that’s it.” Anyone who had views that strayed from the beloved Establishment, views that challenged the statist quo, were “fringe” or “extremists,” and shouldn’t be taken seriously.

Had today’s “news” media morons been around during the time of the American Revolution, those who promoted property rights, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence would have been run out of town and dismissed as “fringe” and “extremists,” as today’s promoters of liberty still are. Nothing has changed in all these decades in which the government has controlled education and dumbed down generations of people.

The ignorant “news” media along with the dumb-dumbs of the Democrat Party went with a corrupt Alzheimer’s sufferer as their favored candidate for President. That tells us something, doesn’t it?

And you can see how the low-IQ “news” media and their social media compadres are now not only ignoring libertarians and otherwise anti-Establishment dissidents but outright smearing, blacklisting and censoring them.

So while we’re all waiting, waiting, waiting to get final results of the election, election officials are counting, counting, counting ballots, mail-in ballots, absentee, as well as making up and stuffing ballots, putting in names of dead people, finding “lost” ballots in their car trunks and refrigerators, and more. And it’s mostly Democrats doing those cheating things.

Yes, Republicans have cheated and stolen elections or nominations, such as the Romney people stealing the nomination away from Ron Paul in 2012, but mainly it’s Democrats doing most of the cheating. They are the ones who want to extend ballot deadlines well past the date of the election, so they have more time to throw out Republican ballots and make up new ballots. The Democrats are the party of “ranked choice,” which is used to intentionally confuse voters and so the third runner-up will be the winner and not the actual top vote-getter. And the Democrats are the party who don’t want ID requirements to verify a voter’s identity. It’s easier to cheat without being required to identify yourself. Duh.

And in this election specifically, the Democrat and leftist people have shown how unhinged they are in their hatred of Donald Trump. I’ve never seen anything like it in all my years.

First they make up a “Russia collusions, interfering in the election” scheme, along with a made-up Steele dossier that was used to present false information to the FISA court to illegally spy on the Trump campaign (a collusions accusation that was all debunked by the Mueller report). And then they have a CIA “whistleblower” use an everyday phone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president to try to impeach Trump, which didn’t succeed. And then the Covid scamdemic, whose main purpose was to terrorize the masses to fear voting in person on November 3rd so they would want to mail in ballots, so the mail-in balloting could be used for massive cheating and voter fraud (like they’re doing right now). The scamdemic terrorism and panic was also used to tank the economy, and tank they did, to try to undo Trump’s economic successes with the tax-cut-stimulated economic expansion and extremely low unemployment rate.

But despite the schemes and the cheating, by extremist, unhinged low-IQ psychopaths and loony-tunes Democrats and their “national security” partners, Trump will probably still win reelection. Nancy Lugosi will begin the first of many impeachment proceedings because she and the other wackos just don’t like him. But the House will stay under Democrat control for that wonderful gridlock. If you’re pro-liberty, should should appreciate gridlock. And if Biden still wins, the Senate looks like it will remain Republican controlled to slow down the Democrats in the Soviet-clone communist paradise they are drooling to inflict on the rest of us.

Ignorant, government-loving Trump still hasn’t drained the swamp, and it doesn’t seem he ever will. Not with Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr, Chris Wray and Gina Haspel, as well as the Goldman Sachs crowd including Steven Mnuchin. And all the military generals Trump has surrounded himself with, all those horrible interventionists, neocons, militarists, globalists, etc.

In 2012 there was a good chance that a Republican presidential nominee Ron Paul could have ousted Obama, because Dr. Paul was the only candidate who was beating Obama in the polls in head-to-head matches. Romney is…whatever.

But the truth is, the only way now to save our hanging-by-a-thread civilized society is to decentralize the society. That means getting rid of the government in Washington, even through secession if necessary. Such a notion bothers a lot of people who are long-time nationalists, like most conservatives especially. But that is what needs to be done. Otherwise, it is becoming Soviet Union 2.0 and that’s not good.