Skip to content

Category: Criminal justice

Biden = Obama 2.0: Warmonger, War Criminal, Anti-Civil Liberties, Anti-Due Process

If Joe Biden really is going to be inaugurated President on January 20th, first I don’t think he will last very long with that Alzheimer’s he obviously has. So, it will probably be a President Kommie-la Harris. And if Biden is President, it will be Obama 2.0, with all the warmongers Biden is taking from the Obama administration to be in top positions.

Daniel Larison updates us on Biden’s pick to be Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, who was Biden’s national security advisor when Biden was VP, and who was also the Deputy Secretary of State under Obomber.

(Blinken) stands by the false argument that Biden’s vote to authorize the invasion of Iraq was a “vote for tough diplomacy.” He was reportedly in favo of the Libyan intervention, which Biden opposed, and he was initially a defender and advocate for U.S. support for the Saudi coalition war on Yemen. In short, Blinken has agreed with some of the biggest foreign policy mistakes (of the Obama administration).

And more.

Winslow Wheeler and Pierre Sprey detail Biden’s pick for Secretary of Defense, Michele Flournoy, Obama’s “Under Secretary of Defense for Policy,” whatever that is, who is also not only a severe warmonger and militarist but one of those revolving door corporatist types.

Keep in mind Flournoy‘s extensive defense industry ties. In 2002 she went from positions in the Pentagon and the National Defense University to the mainstream but hawkish Center for Strategic and International Studies, which is largely funded by industry and Pentagon contributions. Five years later, she co-founded the second-most heavily contractor-funded think tank in Washington, the highly influential Center for a New American Security (CNAS). That became a stepping stone to her role as under secretary of defense for policy in the Obama administration. From there she rotated­­ to the Boston Consulting Group, after which the firm’s military contracts expanded from $1.6 million to $32 million in three years. She also joined the board of Booz Allen Hamilton, a consulting firm laden with defense contracts. In 2017 she co-founded WestExec Advisors, helping defense corporations market their products to the Pentagon and other agencies.

Though WestExec Advisors does not reveal its clients, Flournoy has stated, “Building bridges between Silicon Valley and the U.S. government is really, really important,” even a “labor of love.” WestExec is also careful not to designate Flournoy as a lobbyist, which could run afoul of Biden’s likely prohibitions against appointing “lobbyists” to senior positions. But a WestExec source did tell an interviewer, “We’ll tell you who to go talk to” and what to tell them. This simply circumvents the legalities; it is lobbying by remote control.

And Medea Benjamin and Nicolas Davies had an earlier article on Flournoy, asking, “Will Michele Fournoy be the angel of death for the American Empire?”

And then there is Avril Haines, Obama’s Deputy Director of CIA and Deputy National Security Advisor, who Biden wants to be his Director of National Intelligence (DNI), the position that James Clapper had. Remember him? The DNI is the one that all the other intelligence agency heads report to, including CIA director, FBI and NSA.

Here is what Wikipedia says about Avril Haines:

In 2015 Haines was tasked with determining whether CIA personnel involved in the hacking of the computers of Senate staffers who were authoring the Senate Intelligence Committee report on CIA torture would be disciplined. Haines chose not to discipline them, overruling the CIA Inspector General. Subsequently, she was involved in the CIA project of redacting the Senate report for release….

During her years in Obama White House, Haines played a significant role working closely with John Brennan in determining administration policy on “targeted killings” by drones.

Not exactly “Miss Civil Liberties,” that’s for sure.

The New York Times and Washington Post described the Obama targeted drone strike killings, which Obama escalated after Bush, and which Trump has escalated many more times as Obama. Most of the drone strikes kill innocent people, not “terrorists.”

As I wrote in my article in November of 2012,

The program in question is the U.S. President’s assassinations of “terrorists,” or “terrorist supporters,” without due process, and without the President being required to present evidence against the accused.

So really we are talking about suspected terrorists. And worse, most of those who have been murdered overseas by Obama’s drone bombings have been innocent civilians and not actual terrorists [.pdf].

To cover themselves, as noted in the earlier NYT article, the Obama Administration has defined as “militants” (and thus worthy of a U.S. Presidential execution by drone) “all military-age males” who were unfortunate enough to find themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time.

You see, one reason the writers of the U.S Constitution included a Bill of Rights is to protect the right of all people to due process. That means that, if the government wants to accuse someone of something, such as terrorism, the government is morally, legally and constitutionally obligated to provide evidence against the accused. All people who are accused of something have a right to require the accuser to provide evidence.

But no, when the U.S. government draws up a “Kill List” for those designated foreigners (and Americans too now, as of the Obama administration), and then fires drone strikes at the named individuals, without any due process, without providing evidence against the accused, without a trial, then the government is acting criminally.

What? You didn’t know about the Obama “Kill List”? (I assume Trump has been doing the same thing.)

As I wrote in my aforementioned article,

However, while the Times, the Post and many amongst the MSM act as spokesmen for the Obama Administration’s drone-murder program, there are nevertheless many people who still don’t know about them, about Obama’s “kill list” and Obama’s NDAA provision of indefinite detention of Americans, and so forth. In this video, an interviewer talks to Obama supporters who can’t believe that those policies are Obama’s. And in this video, the same ignorance is shown by a sitting U.S. Congresswoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And in this video, former Homeland Security Sec. Tom Ridge exemplifies many Americans’ cluelessness about the Obama “kill list,” and their lack of understanding of the meaning of a government program that administers death arbitrarily without any legality or due process.

So, with the militarist warmonger ladies mentioned above in a new Biden administration, it looks like we will see more U.S. government war crimes with drone strikes, foreign invasions and occupations, and provocations of foreigners. Trump hasn’t really deescalated all that, quite frankly.

After Biden’s two weeks tops, President Kommie-la will continue the same anti-civil liberties, anti-due process policies as Bush, Obama, Trump and probably Biden, given Kommie-la’s record as a vicious prosecutor in California.

More News and Commentary

Mike Maharrey: Trump’s Plan to Expand the National Police-State.

Brian Shilhavy: North Carolina Citizens Defy Proposed Mandatory Mask Law – City Council Stunned by Turn Out, Backs Down.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr: NIAID Contract Obligates Pentagon to Buy 500,000,000 Doses of Moderna’s COVID Vaccine for $9 Billion.

Tom Woods: Guess What Biden’s Virus Adviser Wants To Do

Matt Taibbi: 10 Ways to Call Something Russian Disinformation Without Evidence.

Scott Shackford: Joe Biden Envisions a Kinder, Gentler Drug War. We Should Demand Its End.

Ted Galen Carpenter: Nation Building Overseas? America’s Own Neighborhood is Becoming More Violent.

Jacob Hornberger: No Debate Over the Welfare-Warfare State.

John Whitehead: Something Wicked This Way Comes: Anarchy Is Being Loosed Upon the Nation.

Derrick Broze: The Darkest Winter (2020)

Sydney Powell: Biden Is Running a Protection Racket.

Zero Hedge: Project Veritas Infiltrates Texas ‘Ballot Chasing’ Ring Targeting Senior Citizens.

Big League Politics: ‘Protest by the Tens of Millions’: Left-Wing Coalition Demands Chaos in the Streets to Force Trump’s Ouster Following Election.

Breitbart: Video: Biden Campaign Bus Runs Red Light to Flee Pro-Trump ‘Democrat Cemetery Vote Collector’ Hearse

And Maryam Henein: Google Whistleblower & Conservative Influencers File Lawsuit To Punch Google & Restore Free Speech.

Law Enforcement Officers Must Disobey Unlawful Orders

Retired Sheriff Richard Mack is founder and president of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. He was interviewed by Dr. Joseph Mercola and some of the discussion included the sheriffs’ oath to obey the U.S. Constitution, especially in regards to the unconstitutional orders that mayors and governors have been inflicting on their respective citizens, i.e. serfs, to wear masks, socially distance or be forbidden to gather in groups of certain numbers.

Sheriff Mack mentions the importance of the officials’ oath to the U.S. Constitution (and to their respective state constitutions).

Law enforcement officers recite several different oaths when they are sworn in, I believe.

According to the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the Law Enforcement Oath of Honor reads: “On my honor, I will never betray my integrity, my character or the public trust. I will always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for our actions. I will always maintain the highest ethical standards and uphold the values of my community, and the agency I serve.”

The city of Phoenix law enforcement officers, for instance, also recite the following oath: “I (state your name), do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution and laws of the State of Arizona, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same, and defend them against enemies, foreign and domestic, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge, the duties of a peace officer, to the best of my ability, so help me God.”

Many U.S. local law enforcement officers recite the same or similar oaths.

And when it comes to the U.S. military, as I wrote in this article,

All U.S. military enlistees swear or affirm an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same … according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice…”

Now, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, or Title 10 U.S. Code Chapter 47, indicates that military personnel must obey “lawful” orders. For example, if accused of “willfully disobeying a lawful command of his superior commissioned officer,” a serviceman may be punished accordingly. And if accused of “willfully disobeying the lawful order of a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer,” a serviceman may be punished accordingly. And the law specifically states that one who “violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation,” or who has “knowledge of any other lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order,” the serviceman may be punished accordingly.

Note how military personnel must obey “lawful” orders. Therefore they are not legally obligated to obey unlawful orders, by superior officers, or even by the President of the United States.

Of course, as I also noted, that would mean that all U.S. government officials, law enforcement officials and U.S. military personnel who swore an oath to support, defend and obey the U.S. Constitution are obligated to support, defend and obey ALL parts of the Constitution. And I believe that would especially apply to the Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which recognize some of the rights that people naturally have prior to the formation of the government that may not be violated by government officials.

In the aforementioned interview of Sheriff Richard Mack, Sheriff Mack states, “The place we start is the Declaration of Independence … So, we teach all that…And then we go into the Bill of Rights. I’m telling you, if our peace officers in this country understand that quote, ‘To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men,’ right from the Declaration of Independence, we find what the proper role of government is, and that is to secure God given rights, natural rights, our innate rights. That is the job of every peace officer in this country.”

That means that our government police and other officials may not violate our rights to the freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom from religion, the right to assembly and the right to criticize the government, the right of self-defense and the right to keep and bear arms, the right to be secure in our homes, persons, papers and effects, the right to be free from suspicion-less searches and seizures, the right to due process, the right to be free from government stealing our property, the right to be protected from false accusation with the right to face one’s accuser and require that accusers present evidence against the accused, the right to trial by a jury of one’s peers, the right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment, etc.

The Bill of Rights also includes the 9th and 10th Amendments.

The Ninth Amendment: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

In my view, we have many rights besides the ones I just mentioned, too many to be specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights. All those more specific rights are within the general category of self-ownership, and are under the general rights mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

And the Tenth Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.” (See the Tenth Amendment Center.)

Now, while Sheriff Mack referred to the mask mandates being unconstitutional especially because they are not actual laws but only “executive orders” by governors and mayors, and therefore should not be enforced by law enforcement officers, I wanted to briefly address the riots, assaults, acts of arson and looting in the cities that are referred to by very dishonest people in politics and the media as “peaceful protests” regardless of the rioters’ destroying those cities.

If a mayor, governor, or even a police chief orders a law enforcement officer to “stand down,” and not arrest someone clearly seen committing criminal acts of property destruction, assaulting others, setting fires to buildings, looting and stealing, then clearly such a “stand down” order is an unlawful order, because it is telling officers to stand by and be a witness to crimes but not intervene, thus making the officer aiding and abetting such criminal activities, in my view.

Such an officer obeying unlawful orders is thus violating at the very least the Law Enforcement Oath of Honor, which I quoted above, and will repeat here: “On my honor, I will never betray my integrity, my character or the public trust. I will always have the courage to hold myself and others accountable for our actions. I will always maintain the highest ethical standards and uphold the values of my community, and the agency I serve.”

I will leave it up to you to determine whether a law enforcement officer is violating his oaths by standing by and not arresting rioters who are clearly engaged in violent, criminal activities, hurting people and destroying property and burning down buildings and businesses and stealing away the livelihoods of the people who own and built those businesses and employ others in the community.

And in regards to police chiefs, mayors, governors or the President of the United States issuing unlawful, unconstitutional orders for law enforcement officers or other government officials which violate the constitutionally-protected rights of the people, the Oath Keepers, an organization of current and former military personnel and law enforcement officers, lists the following unlawful, unconstitutional orders they pledge to not obey (each item continues with a historical context on that page):

1. We will NOT obey any order to disarm the American people…

2. We will NOT obey any order to conduct warrantless searches of the American people, their homes, vehicles, papers, or effects – such as warrantless house-to house searches for weapons or persons…

3. We will NOT obey any order to detain American citizens as “unlawful enemy combatants” or to subject them to trial by military tribunal…

4. We will NOT obey orders to impose martial law or a “state of emergency” on a state, or to enter with force into a state, without the express consent and invitation of that state’s legislature and governor…

5. We will NOT obey orders to invade and subjugate any state that asserts its sovereignty and declares the national government to be in violation of the compact by which that state entered the Union…

6. We will NOT obey any order to blockade American cities, thus turning them into giant concentration camps…

7. We will NOT obey any order to force American citizens into any form of detention camps under any pretext…

8. We will NOT obey orders to assist or support the use of any foreign troops on U.S. soil against the American people to “keep the peace” or to “maintain control” during any emergency, or under any other pretext. We will consider such use of foreign troops against our people to be an invasion and an act of war…

9. We will NOT obey any orders to confiscate the property of the American people, including food and other essential supplies, under any emergency pretext whatsoever…

10. We will NOT obey any orders which infringe on the right of the people to free speech, to peaceably assemble, and to petition their government for a redress of grievances…

And that declaration of disobeying unlawful orders applies whether such orders are issued by superior officers such as police chiefs, or executives such as mayors, governors, or the President of the United States.

Law enforcement officers are obligated to obey the Constitution above obeying the President and other officers.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg Has Died

To further complicate the 2020 presidential election campaign, Supreme Bureaucrat Ruth Bader Ginsburg has finally kicked the bucket, after suffering 20 years or more of cancers and other illnesses.

Trump wants to nominate a replacement “justice,” and Democrats want Trump to wait until after the election, “after the people have voted.” But the people have voted, in 2016, and the current presidential term still has 4 months to go. So there.

Now, as far as I’m concerned, Ginsburg should not be replaced, and the remaining “justices” (sic)  should all be dismissed, forthwith. They all suck. They are all rubber-stampers for the State.

Rarely does the High Court rule in favor of the individual and individual rights, private property rights, voluntary association and voluntary contract.

There was one decision that I can think of in which Ginsburg voted the right way, an 8-1 decision and she was the lone dissent. The 8 nazis voted in favor of government police violently breaking into people’s homes, terrorizing them and arresting them because of the State’s “war on drugs,” because the police “smelled marijuana” and heard “evidence being destroyed.”

Evidence of WHAT? Someone smoking marijuana in his own home? There is no crime there. There is no victim there. Sadly, the other “liberals” on the High Court agreed with the drug nazis and disagreed with Ginsburg who cited that dusty old Fourth Amendment.

But her vote in that case certainly was not a vote in favor of private property rights, as she also voted with the majority in the Kelo vs. New London case, in which the High Court allowed for private developers to steal private property, aided and abetted by local government schnooks, on behalf of private interests and not on behalf of the “public” that the Fifth Amendment demands.

So in general, Ginsburg was awful, voting to approve government fascism in other ways, such as ObamaCare’s mandate and other horrible rulings against the rights of the people and their property. In the end, with few exceptions such as the aforementioned police-marauder drug case, Ginsburg was just another pinko commie bureaucrat. Oh, well.

USSA News and Commentary

Caitlin Johnstone: News Media Who Ignore The Julian Assange Trial Are Admitting They Don’t Care About Journalism.

Adam Dick: CDC Director: No ‘Regular Life’ Until At Least the Middle of Next Year

Joseph Mercola: Injectable Biochip for SARS-CoV-2 Detection Near FDA Approval

James Bovard: The FBI’s Forgotten Crimes against Richard Jewell.

And Dave DeCamp: Daniel Ellsberg Testifies in Defense of Julian Assange and WikiLeaks.

Orwellian Third World Totalitarian Amerika USSA

Jonathan Turley: ACLU Official Attacks University For Admitting Nick Sandmann While Professor Promises To Monitor His Conduct.

Charles Burris: The Moscow Show Trials of the 1930s

Craig Murray: Jullian Assange Extradition, Day One

Glenn Greenwald: Journalism’s New Propaganda Tool: Using “Confirmed” to Mean Its Opposite.

Edward Curtin: From Terrorists to Viruses: Dystopian Progress.

Matt Agorist: Police Chief Forced Out for Having Cops Solve Actual Crimes Instead of Enforcing Ticket Quota.

Damon Root: Abolish Qualified Immunity.

Jon Rappoport: The Political Battle Over a COVID Vaccine: Your Health Is of No Concern.

James Bolt: Australia’s Covid Police State.

John Vibes: Three More Arrested In Australia For Making Anti-Lockdown Posts Online.

Jacob Hornberger: Social Security, Freedom, and the Constitution.

Wendy McElroy: Cryptocurrency and Libertarianism.

Paul Craig Roberts: Trump’s DHS to Label White Supremacists as the “Most Persistent and Lethal Threat” to the U.S.

Gateway Pundit: Denver Black Lives Matter Mobs Swarming Restaurants, Harassing Diners With Their Tantrums… AGAIN.

Zero Hedge: Former CIA Spook Warns “The Violence Will Get Even Worse”

And Tom Luongo: A False Flag Is Biden’s Only Chance to Win.

A Debate Between Two of NH Gov. Sununu’s Republican Primary Opponents

The Republican governor of New Hampshire, Chris Sununu, is considered by freedom lovers to be a tyrant who has abused his office especially when ordering businesses closed and causing economic chaos and job losses, much like the fascists in many other states, based on the scamdemic that we are still suffering. Sununu’s latest act of fascism was ordering the people of New Hampshire to have to wear masks on their faces if in gatherings of over 100 people, despite the studies which show that the face masks do not prevent the transmission of viruses and in fact could cause harm to the individual.

As I have mentioned previously, Sununu has two opponents in the Republican primary this September 8th, Nobody and Karen Testerman. I had written about Nobody, who had his name legally changed to Nobody, in this post.

There was a debate between Nobody and Testerman and, while Chris Sununu was invited to participate, he decided to snub his opponents. The debate between the two opponents was moderated by Mark Edge of Free Talk Live.

The two primary opponents discussed government schools, the drug war, COVID and Sununu’s fascist business closures, recent riots and violence in the cities in Amerika, and the possibility of New Hampshire state secession.

It certainly was a good debate and discussion. Very good points made by both candidates.

Besides Sunono’s fascism with COVID, he is also an anti-freedom-of-speech, anti-private-property, anti-freedom-of-association SJW in his signing the bills banning “discrimination” based on gender identity, and banning so-called “conversion therapy.” So the governor believes there are thought crimes which must be punished. He signed the bills only weeks before his previous reelection as governor in 2018. Conservatives who don’t know about that might want to consider ousting Sunono for those reasons as well as COVID fascism.

News and Commentary

Sharyl Attkisson: The Lori Loughlin Case Exposes the Justice System’s Double Standards.

Robert Wenzel: Let the COVID-19 Trials Begin!

John Whitehead: The Great Election Fraud: Will Our Freedoms Survive Another Election?

Patrick Armstrong: Americans, War – Slow Learners

Richard Ebeling: Biden’s “Passion and Purpose” is More Political Paternalism.

Ron Paul: Amid Pandemic, Freedoms Are Disappearing

Glenn Beck: “Brainwashed: How Black Lives Matter Hijacked Our Schools” (video).

Jon Miltimore: Google’s Plan to Disrupt the College Degree Is Exactly What the Higher Education Market Needs.

Barbara Boland: Jared Kushner’s Transactional Middle East Strategy is Already Showing Strain.

Jeff Deist: Getting Liberalism Wrong.

Charles Burris: Black Lives Matter and the Communist Pedigree of the Clenched-fist Salute

And Gareth Porter: After Beirut Blast, Israel Revives Tale of Hezbollah Ammonium Nitrate Terror Plots.

Election 2020 in Third World Amerika

So, last week was the Democrat convention. I only heard excerpts of the speeches on the radio. The Obamas, the Clintons, Cruella Harris, John Kerry, Cory Schnooker. Oh, they were inspiring, all right.

But did anyone there mention how Barack Obama and his VP Joe Biden continued the fascist drug war viciously, and that they went after medical marijuana people even in states that legalized medical marijuana? What about the drone strikes that murder mainly innocent civilians overseas that Obama escalated after Bush?

Did they mention how as a U.S. Senator Joe Biden wrote or sponsored legislation hardening the drug war, and in fact gave us drug-related asset forfeiture? Just look at all the awful fascist laws Biden gave Amerika. Many of those laws have negatively affected black people much more than whites. But remember, if you don’t vote for Biden, “you ain’t black!”

Sadly, Donald Trump agrees with the fascist drug war, and in fact he has said he wants to militarize it! Doh!

So far, the Republicans have begun their convention with speakers who are trying to give people “hope,” but they are nevertheless fellow fascists, neocons, drug warriors and regime-change warmongers. Oh, well.

Trump was correct toward the beginning of the scamdemic that the hysteria and panic was unwarranted, until the bureaucratic swamp that surrounds him in the White House gave him a good psy-opping. If Trump isn’t going to tell the American people that the CDC and NIH and Fauci have been lying to us about the “virus,” then he is one of them, as far as I’m concerned. He’s a liar, too. And a swamp creature as well.

We know that “175,000” people “killed by COVID-19” is a lie, because CDC and most of the states’ “public health” bureaucrats are counting heart disease deaths, diabetes deaths, stroke deaths, accidental deaths, gunshot deaths, etc. as “COVID-19 deaths,” simply if the deceased person had tested positive for coronavirus. We know that most of the “COVID” patients put on ventilators die, and probably because of the ventilator. And we know that COVID-19 has a .1 to .2% infection fatality rate, just like seasonal flu. So given that the COVID-19 is no more deadly than the seasonal flu, not only is “175,000 people killed by COVID-19” a lie, it’s not even close to that.

The panic-inciting bureaucrats and their co-conspirators in the media have been engaging in such Orwellian fear-mongering for what reason? Are they trying to terrify the masses into not wanting to physically go to the polls to vote in primaries or in the November election? It wouldn’t surprise me. The Trump haters lied about “Russia collusions” for 3 years, and Adam Stiff and Jerry Noodler conducted Spanish Inquisitions to try to get Trump but they failed. We see how corrupt these people are, and their cohorts in the media.

Look, if you can go to the grocery store, the bank and other places as people have been doing, then you can go to the polls and vote. That will ensure that your vote will be counted.

However, if you vote by mail, there is a very good chance that your vote won’t be counted. Given the cancel culture and the censorship and shame crusade against Trump supporters, if you’re a Trump voter do you really want the election workers who open those envelopes to see your name and know that you voted for Trump?

No, I’m not a Trump supporter or voter, I wouldn’t even vote for the joke of a “Libertarian” Party, with that sheeple Jo Smorgasbord, wearing the mask of submission to the State that symbolizes serfdom and suppression of dissent. And standing with the Marxists of “Black Lives Matter,” who don’t give a damn about the many more black lives being murdered by other black people than by police (and the “blacks and browns” being murdered by U.S. CIA drone strikes overseas, quite frankly). And besides, Jorgensen only won 5,000 or so votes in the states’ primaries for 2020, while Jacob Hornberger won some 9,000 votes, yet the convention partiers decided to go with Jorgensen!

Speaking of “Black Lives Matter”/Antifa, why do media and Democrats refer to rioters, looters, vandals, arsonists burning down businesses, people throwing rocks and bricks at others, as “peaceful protesters”? What about the marauders going into quiet, suburban neighborhoods to wake up the “white, rich people”?

You probably heard about the “white, rich couple” in St. Louis, the McCloskeys, who brandished their firearms when a large group of marauding terrorists broke into and trespassed on their property and threatened to burn their house down. The corrupt DA is investigating the couple for defending their home and their lives! They are actually Democrats who spoke at the Republican convention. Go figure.

But I digress. Regarding the mail-in cheating, if that gets imposed in many states for November, and for no good reason except as a means for people to cheat more easily, then we are going to see contested state election after contested state election, lawsuits galore, with voting challenges stuck in the courts for weeks, even months. This will not only apply to the Presidential election but to Congressional races as well. It can only be chaos, and may not be resolved by early January because Congressional races will not be resolved, and by January 20th Nancy Lugosi will be sworn in as President. Hooray for “democracy”! Don’t you love it?

Corrupt Warmongers and Corrupt COVID Fear-Mongers in USSA

Tony Cartalucci: What is the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED)?

Jon Miltimore: The Sneaky Trick a Public Health Official Used to Make Mask Mandates Look Super Effective.

Mac Slavo: “Fear Is the Primary Driver” of Mental Health Problems.

Bruce Franklin: August 12-22, 1945: Washington Starts the Korean and Vietnam Wars

Sidney Miralao: Military Recruiters Don’t Belong in High Schools.

Campus Reform: Universities Ask Students to Play “Coronavirus Police,” Report Peers Who Might Have COVID-19.

Ron Paul: Good News: Fauci’s Out and Common Sense Might Be Returning

Matt Agorist: Federal Judge Makes Radical Move to End Qualified Immunity for Bad Cops, Nationally.

Peter Andrews: The Five Biggest Coronavirus Myths BUSTED!

James Bovard: Can Ending ‘Endless Wars’ Save Trump’s Presidency?

And Bonnie Kristian: Reality Check: Still Same Number of U.S. Troops in Afghanistan.

Articles on Totalitarian Amerika, And More

Becky Akers: Masked faith, and Masked DeWack.

Jacob Hornberger: Blindness on Iraq War “patriotism.”

Peter Quinones: Anatomy of a monopoly.

Matt Agorist: After Cops Execute Teen, Destroy Security Cameras, Autopsy Finds He Was Shot in the Back.

Jacob Sullum: Qualified Immunity Is a Test for Conservatives.

Mike Maharrey: ICE Facial Recognition Reveals Interplay Between Federal, State, Local and Private Surveillance.

Chuck Baldwin: The biggest global hoax in history.

Jon Rappoport: Death by killing old people, not COVID — the basic deception.

Gary Barnett: Old lives don’t matter in the coronavirus era of indifference.

Paul Joseph Watson: Fearing Cancellation, Some Withdraw Signatures From Open Letter Decrying Cancel Culture.

Whitney Webb: Meet the Israeli Intelligence-Linked Firm Using AI to Profile Americans and Guide US Lockdown Policy.

Patrick Lawrence: Busting the Myth WikiLeaks Published Nothing on Israel & Syria.

Wendy McElroy: Men’s lives matter: male victims of sexual abuse.

Laurence Vance: The question never asked about federal lands.

And Gareth Porter: How the Pentagon failed to sell Afghan government’s bunk ‘Bountygate’ story to US intelligence agencies.