Jon Rappoport: How the CIA Hid Their MKULTRA Mind-Control Program
Jon Rappoport: How the CIA Hid Their MKULTRA Mind-Control Program
I wrote this post 2 years ago on the 18th anniversary of the September 11th attacks in 2001. So, Saturday is the 20th anniversary and I am reposting this. It gives information that, if you are still very young, your parents and teachers probably didn’t give you about 9/11. And if you are older it gives you information that the brain-dead, zombie government-stenographer mainstream “news” media also didn’t give us, and they still don’t. (I also will have a new post with commentary on this 20th anniversary shortly.)
Post from 2 years ago:
(Originally posted on September 11, 2019)
Today is the 18th anniversary of the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks on the New York World Trade Center, the Pentacon, and in Pennsylvania. Where was I on that day? Well, I was here in this same apartment sitting at my table doing some writing and my father (now deceased) called at around 10 am saying that their trip that they were going to go on that day was canceled and he told me why. Hmm.
The government’s propaganda began immediately on that day and after. 99% of the news media were the White House press spokesmen. There was no discussion of the attackers stated motives, or the history of U.S. government and military’s invasions, bombings and occupations of the Middle East in the 10 years prior to that time. Anyone who did mention those things was labeled “Anti-America,” or “blaming America” for the attacks. Sean Hannity has been especially bad in that regard ever since that time. He is the worst of the worst as far as apparatchiks for the national security state are concerned. I just thought I’d mention that.
However, given that Hannity and all the other radio ditto-heads are accepting of the idea that actual U.S. government FBI, CIA etc. abused their powers including FISA spying in the Russiagate fiasco, maybe now some of these obedient worshipers of the national security state can at least consider the possibility that the official 9/11 narrative isn’t what the government has been telling us for 18 years. (But, I am not holding my breath.)
So, I’m sure that a lot of people reading this post will just skim it and not really take it seriously or click on any of the links for further information. This is because they are satisfied with what the government and its spokespeople of the mainstream media have been telling us since September 11, 2001. All these things they haven’t heard about must be merely whack-job “conspiracy theory” and all that. But there are still some people who are open to the truth.
In the years prior to the attacks, Congressman Ron Paul had several times warned that the U.S. government’s interventionist policies and war that it started against Iraq and elsewhere and Iraqi sanctions would cause blowback and retaliation within our shores. (And the response? Crickets.)
Addendum: For information on the U.S. government’s pre-9/11 sanctions on Iraq throughout the 1990s and their effects, see Jacob Hornberger, Sanctions: the cruel and brutal war against the Iraqi people, and James Bovard, Iraqi sanctions and American intentions: blameless carnage?
It’s amazing just how brainwashed so many people can be by daily propaganda, watching the TV news, listening to chickenhawk warmonger conservative talk radio, and so forth. “Al Qaeda.” “Osama bin Laden,” and “Islamic” were words that people heard over and over and over, but they rarely heard about Saudi Arabia and blowback.
I don’t know what else to write so I will post links to some new and old articles on the subject, and maybe some videos.
James Bovard on the 9/11 Commission, a bootlicking national disgrace.
Paul Sperry from the New York Post writes this week how Robert Mueller helped Saudi Arabia cover up its role in 9/11.
Related to that, a year ago “28 Pages,” which documents Saudi Arabia’s role in 9/11, had an exclusive article on FBI telling a counterterrorism agent not to help 9/11 victims build their case against Saudi Arabia because that might harm U.S.-Saudi relations. (Doh!)
Paul Craig Roberts writes today:
Over the years I have reported the findings of scientists, engineers, and architects that indicate that the official story is false.I had an open mind for two reasons.One is that having been an engineering student, I could tell the difference from a building falling down from asymmetrical structural damage and a building blowing up.The other is that having been involved in policy issues in Washington for a quarter century I knew that such a humiliating defeat suffered by the world’s only superpower at the hands of a few Muslim terrorists would have brought instant demands from the White House, Congress, and media for investigation into how every aspect of the American national security state failed simultaneously on one morning.Instead the White House resisted the 9/11 families demands for an investigation for one year and never delivered a forensic investigation.Instead, the country was given a 9/11 Commission Report that was merely the government’s official story of what happened.No heads rolled.No one was fired or even reprimanded.To hold no one accountable for such a massive failure and humiliating defeat is not a believable response if the official 9/11 story is true.
Washington’s Blog: Everything we’re doing now was planned before 9/11. And Washington asks, Will the mainstream media ever report on the numerous admitted false flag terror attacks? Many examples given. And another post about U.S. government’s foreknowledge and aiding and abetting the terrorists.
The Guardian: Osama bin Laden had ties to CIA
David Ray Griffin asks, Where is the evidence that Osama bin Laden had responsibility in 9/11? (Remember, Hannity et al. have been complaining ad nauseam, and rightly, that people accusing Trump of “Russia collusions” do not have any evidence, and so on. Evidence is important.) The FBI’s 10 most wanted list included Osama bin Laden because of the African embassy and USS Cole bombings, but NOT because of 9/11 because they had no evidence linking the two. Further info from the Muckraker Report. Read Griffin’s book, Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive?
In 2009 the Daily Mail asked, Has Osama bin Laden been dead for 7 years?
An early 2002 Dan Rather CBS News report on bin Laden’s serious illness:
A December, 2001 Fox News story, still online: Bin Laden already dead.
Of course, how could Osama bin Laden have been killed and thrown out to sea by SEAL Team 6 in 2011 if bin Laden had already died in 2001 or 2002? Paul Craig Roberts again with some questions.
Another question to ask is what caused the helicopter crash in Afghanistan that killed several SEAL Team 6 members who were involved in the Osama bin Laden “killing” just a couple months before that.
And Paul Joseph Watson on the Bin Laden fable shortly after he was “killed” in 2011. While Steve Watson explains the U.S. government’s history of fake bin Laden tapes.
Former CIA asset Susan Lindauer, a whistleblower who was railroaded and labeled a psychiatric case by USGov, explains more truth about 9/11, and the missing security tapes for the World Trade Center.
Here is an interview in which Lindauer tells about her experiences:
James Corbett with an hour-long discussion on who was really behind the 9/11 attacks:
And here is a video documentary from Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth explaining the evidence that explosions brought down the World Trade Center, and not the fire caused by planes crashing into the buildings:
I admit it. I’m a “truther.” That’s because the truth is important. And as the late Justin Raimondo wrote, the opposite of a “truther” is a “liar.”
The Children’s Health Defense explains why the Pfizer drug injection still may not be mandated, and presents the FDA’s own fact sheets accompanying the “approved” drug injections as evidence.
And also, Joseph Mercola has an article, 60% of Those Older Than 50 Who Die From Covid Are Double Vaxxed. He has a lot of good, up to date info in there that you won’t get from the lying, brain-dead government stenographers of the Amerikan “news” media.
Finally, Jon Rappoport says that regardless of whether the FDA “approval” of drug injections allows for mandates or doesn’t allow for them, the “ultimate bottom line is the individual refusing the shot, No Matter What.”
And I’m working on a post, but it’s taking a little time. So that should be finished in the next few days.
Jacob Hornberger has a post on establishment politicians and bureaucrats (i.e. Democrats and Republicans) blocking ballot access for non-establishment (i.e. non-Democrat and non-Republican), third-party or independent candidates. I agree with him on removing the restrictions. There’s no valid reason for those restrictions. In my view, people have a right to have their name on a ballot if they want to run for public office. While Hornberger doesn’t address this, I think such a right is protected by the First Amendment.
The FDA has rushed through approval of the Pfizer Covid “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine, that doesn’t provide immunity and doesn’t prevent infections or transmissions, and isn’t intended to.
In December, here is how the Children’s Health Defense reported on the FDA meeting to grant Emergency Use Authorization of the Pfizer experimental drug injection:
The FDA’s handpicked acting committee chairman, University of Michigan professor of epidemiology Dr. Arnold Monto, 87, punctuated the dialogue with efforts to hurry it along.
“Okay, we have many, many questions and we’re going to have to limit them.”
“We need to keep it brief.”
“No follow up. We’re pressed for time. I got 10 people who want to ask questions.”
“I’m going to excuse Dr. Fink” — Doran Fink of the FDA — “from having to answer that part of the question.”
“Okay, we’re going to not worry about adaptive and innate immune responses right now. We’ll take that offline.”
“I think we want to stay away from more discussions about immune response and other things that could be taken offline.”
Committee member A. Oveta Fuller, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Michigan, worried about potential side effects.
“So we have no idea what putting a messenger RNA lipid vaccine into people does long-term,” she said. “And we’re going from 20,000 people who get this vaccine to millions who get this vaccine with a very limited amount of risk assessment.”
But the rushed hearing seemed like it might have been “a dog and pony show for the public,” patient advocate Kim Witczak, the consumer representative on another FDA advisory committee, told the Project On Government Oversight (POGO).
Witczak said she was left shaking her head as questions were dismissed in disturbing fashion.
“I don’t think at the end of the day I had full trust in the process,” Witczak said.
It didn’t have to be that way, Peter Doshi, an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, noted in an email to POGO.
“I do not feel one should be rushing a decision like this. If the meeting required additional discussion, the meeting should have been extended,” Doshi said.
Monto, tapped to fill in as chairman of the committee, had received tens of thousands of dollars from companies working on coronavirus vaccines. According to a federal database, in 2018, Pfizer paid him a $3,500 consulting fee.
My, isn’t that a shock!
Jon Rappoport writes about the FDA’s now full approval this week of the Pfizer “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine, with no hearing and all taking place behind closed doors.
An 8/20 article in the BMJ (“Covid-19: FDA set to grant full approval to Pfizer vaccine without public discussion of data”)  quotes a few of these dissenting mainstream pros. For example:
“Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data.”
“’These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,’ she said. ‘The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval’.”
“Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a [public FDA] meeting ‘we have no idea what the data looks like’.”
“’It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,’ she said. ‘There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed’.”
“’Full approval of covid-19 vaccines must be done in an open public forum for all to see. It could set a precedent of lowered standards for future vaccine approvals’.”
Understand—this devastating criticism of the FDA is coming from a person who operates WITHIN the public-health establishment.
Don’t believe anything that government bureaucrats tell you, they are thoroughly corrupt, and a bunch of liars. FDA/CDC/NIH/HHS bureaucrats in bed with pharmaceutical flunkies.
But many people naively trust their bureaucrats in control because the government stenographers of the “news” media repeat their propaganda over and over and over until the lies become “facts.” And people don’t want to believe that the rulers are corrupt and lying to them and using them as guinea pigs and walking all over them and so forth.
With all the thousands and thousands of deaths now, and other injuries and paralysis associated with these untested, experimental drug injections, anyone who has been pressured, coerced or mandated to receive the injection and this mRNA experiment, and has severe reactions should sue the employer, venue, mayor, or agency that has inflicted the harm through coercion and mandates.
The bureaucrats of the FDA need to be criminally charged with fraud and other crimes. Bureaucrats, mayors and governors, and their “news” media repeaters have been either intentionally or ignorantly making millions of people wrongly believe that these dangerous experimental drug injections are safe (and not deadly), and that they actually prevent infections and transmission of the virus, when they were not even intended to prevent those things.