Skip to content

Category: Civil Liberties

On Censorship of the Truth and Science

In reference to my recent post on investigative reporter Jon Rappoport’s WordPress.com blog taken down by the truth censors a week ago, he has written an update on that which is appearing on Activist Post. One important topic that he writes about is the vaccine issue, and I was speculating that that might be why the truth censors are censoring his blog now.

On his recent update, Rappoport writes

Why did they censor me? Was it my articles about toxic vaccines, about freedom of the individual vs. the State, about the CIA, about Obama, about Trump, about political liars, about medical drugs killing millions of people? Lots to choose from. Who really cares what it was exactly? It was CENSORSHIP.

I wasn’t laying out charts for building H-bombs. WordPress shut down my blog without notice or warning or explanation. However, I see no reason to stop writing. So I’m keeping on. I’ve got people employing “other means” to get the blog back up. Regardless, here I am.

And he writes, regarding the difference between being informed/knowledgeable and censorship:

In the 1950s, we had, in the US, a Red Scare. It consisted of Communist ideology. The question was, should students be allowed to read the Communist Manifesto, or should Marx’s pamphlet be burned and banned? The knee-jerk reaction was: ban the booklet. The minority opinion was: let students read it and understand it. But of course, the American school system hadn’t prepared pupils to analyze ANYTHING.

So there was no solution. The whole Red Scare faded away eventually, as a “kinder, gentler” Leftist ideology spread through the country like ink on a blotter.

EDUCATION SHOULD PREPARE PEOPLE TO MAKE UP THEIR OWN MINDS THROUGH THOUGHT AND LOGIC.

Censorship is the coward’s way out.

Censorship works when evil people accumulate enough power. This power CAN BE affected when a strong enough public reaction occurs. That’s called a clue.

As I wrote in my initial post on Jon Rappoport’s blog being taken down, in the news and on mainstream media we hear a lot of hysteria and propaganda on the vaccine issue. Especially now with the measles outbreak. Hysterical news media and establishment pharma-paid doctors are beating the drums with false information that the measles outbreak is being caused by unvaccinated people, yet the opposite is true. Studies are finding that the measles outbreaks are more among vaccinated populations, and because the vaccine itself is not effective.

The pharmaceutical industry definitely has a stranglehold on today’s establishment “doctors,” while those who cite studies questioning the vaccines or other pharmaceutical drugs are stifled.

Another item of propaganda is that studies have “debunked” the assertion that vaccines have caused injuries, especially in children, whose brains are still in important developing stages. I’ve linked to this before, but Sharyl Attkisson has this article on what the news isn’t saying about vaccine-autism studies. She details several studies, one after another. Yet, the typical response from the hypnotized and propagandized zombies is, “But that’s been debunked.” No, it’s not “debunked.”

And it isn’t just autism, but various kinds of cognitive issues, conditions and diseases including Alzheimer’s that could be in part related to vaccines. One explanation for this is the adjuvants used in vaccines, especially aluminum.

Would all the debunkers out there like to explain why the government has paid out over $4 billion in compensation for vaccine injuries, if there’s no problem with vaccines?

So, besides fascists like NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio ordering unvaccinated children to stay in even though they are not sick and pose no danger to anyone, we have the propagandists with their information control to censor the truth about this one issue, which seems to be soooo controversial that many people on both sides — the fascist side versus the freedom side — arguing for really no good reason.

And finally, it really is a matter of the right to informed choice and consent. So regarding those who want to make vaccines mandatory by law and who want to criminalize those who don’t get a vaccine, I will quote Tom Knapp on this, which I did before.

Debate Proposition:

Resolved, that there is no difference in principle between sticking a needle in someone’s body without his or her permission and sticking a penis in someone’s body without his or her permission.

More Articles

The Mises Institute wants to send Henry Hazlitt’s book, Economics in One Lesson to thousands of young people all across the country and requests some help to do that.

Stefan Kløvning discusses the growth of the Amerikan police state.

Gennie Gebhart on Human Rights Watch reverse engineering mass surveillance app used by police in Xinjiang.

Zero Hedge with an article on a new app in which easily offended sheeple can report anyone who offends them to law enforcement immediately.

Ray McGovern discusses “Turnkey Tyranny” on the streets of Washington.

Jacob Hornberger on the world’s dictatress.

Owen Walsh with an article on corporate media targeting Tulsi Gabbard for her anti-interventionism.

Ryan McMaken says that Bernie and Ocasio-Cortez declare war on the poor with anti-credit card law.

And Craig Murray on the real Muellergate scandal.

News and Commentary

John Whitehead says, Predator cops, guilty of sex crimes against women and children, are a menace to society.

William Hartung and Mandy Smithberger discuss “Boondoggle, Inc.” The national security state’s $1.25 trillion budget.

Ron Paul asks, A nuclear war? Over Venezuela?

Tor Ekeland says that the law being used to prosecute Julian Assange is broken.

Jacob Hornberger asks, Which new war next: Iran or Venezuela?

William Astore on how the Pentacon took ownership of Donald Trump, 6 ways to curb America’s military machine.

Giorgio Cafiero says Baghdadi is alive — and so is the ISIS narrative.

Thomas Knapp has a debate proposition: “Resolved, that there is no difference in principle between sticking a needle in someone’s body without his or her permission and sticking a penis in someone’s body without his or her permission.”

And Richard Ebeling says that the presidential political circus has begun.

Julian Assange Being Tortured in Captivity

Karen Kwiatkowski has an article on Julian Assange’s kidnapping and false imprisonment at Belmarsh Prison in London, U.K., in which he is being harshly interrogated by both British and U.S. goons.

According to Kwiatkowski’s sources, Assange is being forcibly given 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate, which causes psychotic episodes, in which the victim is out of touch with reality, and sometimes is imagining one’s murderers who aren’t there. So, if that is what that drug does, then what is the point of interrogating him if you are trying to get truthful answers?

No, the CIA and MI6 don’t care about truthful answers from their victim. They just want to break him psychologically. Government criminals use torture mainly to coerce or extract false confessions or to falsely implicate others. It has nothing to do with getting the truth. In fact, since the truth is what Assange has been publishing from his WikiLeaks, this is exactly why they are after him.

Government criminals don’t like being outed in their crimes. So they persecute, harass, or jail whistleblowers and leakers to punish them. That is what they did to NSA whistleblowers William Binney and Thomas Drake, and CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou (who exposed the CIA torture program that the criminals of the U.S. government want to hide).

So because Julian Assange operates WikiLeaks that was responsible for exposing the Iraq War crimes, Afghanistan War crimes and the diplomatic cables fiasco, and the Collateral Murder video, he and WikiLeaks were called a “Hostile Intelligence Service” by the now Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, the former CIA director. Like past Secretaries of State, Mike Pompeo is really the “Secretary of Belligerence,” quite frankly.

In fact, in an article this week Paul Craig Roberts accurately describes Pompeo as an “ignorant warmonger masquerading as an American Secretary of State,” an “idiot,” “moronic imposter.” All true. Roberts states that Pompeo doesn’t get Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution. But wait a minute, when Pompeo was in Congress, he was a member of the “Congressional Constitution Caucus,” in which those congresspeople were supposedly supporters of the U.S. Constitution! (Most of them voted for indefinite detention of Americans to show off their knowledge and expertise of the U.S. Constitution, just to be clear.)

So, government criminals obviously don’t want their crimes exposed, which is mainly what WikiLeaks and Assange have been doing for the past 10 years now. When bureaucrats’ crimes are exposed, watch the government criminals scamper like cockroaches when you turn the lights on.

Government criminals are even worse than private sector criminals, because government criminals have the law and authority on their side. Government bureaucrats ARE the law! When they act criminally, it is very difficult for those who are ruled over to get justice. This is why, for example, James Comey, John Brennan, James Clapper, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates, Peter Strzok, Loretta Lynch and Obama will probably get away with their instigating a false accusation narrative of “Trump-Russia collusions” and abusing their FISA spying authority to spy on their political opponent.

And that is why Hillary Clinton will probably get away with all her corruption and Clinton Foundation quid pro quo collusions with Russia, Saudi Arabia, and her ties to Christopher Steele and the notorious “Steele Dossier.”

Much of that story that we now know about, we know thanks to WikiLeaks.

Instead of going after the criminals in charge such as those mentioned above, “law enforcement” bureaucrats go after successful private sector people such as Martha Stewart and Michael Milken, people who weren’t even criminals!

And also, these so-called “intelligence” agencies like CIA and MI6. They are not so “intelligent.” For instance, CIA’s coup in Iran during the 1950s and support of the Shah’s regime and SAVAK police state led to the further radicalizing of the Islamic ideologues in Iran which led to the 1979 Revolution and the taking of American hostages there, which led to further tensions between Iran and the U.S. for decades since then. They shouldn’t have instigated that coup in 1953 is a reasonable conclusion.

And in England, MI6 is their “CIA,” while MI5 is their “FBI,” I believe. (And GCHQ is the U.K.’s NSA who spies on innocent people for no good reason.) In 2017 the Manchester, England Ariana Grande concert bombings and London Bridge attack were blowback for British government “intelligence” interventions and intrusions, according to Mark Curtis, who even suggested that one of the London attackers was part of a British covert op in Libya, “trained by U.K. and U.S. ‘liaison’ officers.” And Nafeez Ahmed in this article stated that the “terrorists who rampaged across London on the night of 3 June were part of a wider extremist network closely monitored by MI5 for decades.” In other words, MI5’s incompetence let the bombings go on, just like the FBI’s buffoonery leading to the Boston Marathon bombings after being warned in advance by … the Russians!

These bombings are all blowback for the U.S. government and U.K. government and other Western government’s atrocities and aggressions mainly in the Middle East.

If George W. Bush didn’t start the two wars of aggression that he started, for no good reason, then all those subsequent bombings and mass shootings would not have occurred. And there wouldn’t have been the Iraq and Afghanistan War crimes that occurred in which we had whistleblowers to reveal the crimes, and thus WikiLeaks would not have HAD to publish the information for the people to see what their own governments had wrought. And if Bush’s bureaucrat father, George H.W. Bush, now deceased, had not started his first war of aggression against Iraq, there wouldn’t have been a 9/11, and on and on.

But they all did those things, and we have WikiLeaks in order to know the truth about our government criminals, and now the bureaucrat criminals in charge are torturing the messenger, Julian Assange, for telling us the truth.

More Articles

Thomas Knapp says that with Julian Assange, an opportunity for the U.S. and U.K. to change direction on Press freedom.

José Niño says, Forget “states’ rights” — states are too big, too.

Ray McGovern on the Orwellian cloud hovering over Russia-gate.

Ann Wright on historic anti-nuke “Golden Rule”

Mike Maharrey can’t relax about socialism.

Robert Wenzel discusses the state of mental health treatment in the People’s Republic of San Francisco.

Paul Boyce says that occupational licensing is an unnecessary evil.

And Stephen Moore on what the mainstream media will do to you if you are the “enemy,” including opening up your past divorce records.

News and Commentary

John Solomon of The Hill has this article about former Fusion GPS contractor Nellie Ohr’s emails to her DOJ flunky husband Bruce Ohr, emails just recently released due to a FOIA request, followed by members of Congress who have now filed a criminal referral with the DOJ. Nellie had tried to tie Donald Trump and Paul Manafort to Russian gangsters in 2016.

And Solomon also has this article on the Ukrainian embassy which confirmed that a DNC insider tried to solicit from the Ukrainian government any possible dirt on Trump and his campaign chairman in 2016.

Russia expert Prof. Stephen F. Cohen details some little-noted aspects of the first volume of the Mueller report.

Bradley Thomas on freedom or government control — there is no true “third way.”

Art Carden says that people are desperately fleeing socialism, if they are allowed.

Joe Lauria with an article on Assange to the extradition court: “I won’t surrender to the U.S. for doing journalism.

Jacob Hornberger discusses U.S. government hypocrisy on Venezuela.

Andrew Bacevich on when Nixon told us invading Cambodia would save civilization.

Laurence Vance discusses Cory Booker’s “tax cuts” proposal, i.e. expanded welfare.

And Danny Sjursen says the Left needs to stop crushing on the generals.

More Informative Articles on the Vaccine Issue

All we hear now from mainstream news sources are the same government-distributed fear-mongering and pharmaceutical industry-controlled propaganda. The medical establishment are closely tied with the pharmaceutical industry, and many news outlets do not want to offend their pharma sponsors. But if you want actual facts and real information regarding the vaccines, these articles are much more informative.

Bretigne Shaffer discusses the real-life fascist who advocates vaccine medical fascism in real life. A former Obama administration “national security’ official who shows her extreme ignorance on vaccines. These forced-vaccine ignoramuses are extremely dangerous.

Chidlren’s Health Defense Team with an article on why “anti-vaxxers” are really ex-vaxxers.

And Ryan McMaken on why one corporation can dictate measles policy in America. Government central planning, government-created monopolies and control is why consumers have limited choices in vaccines.

In my view, people must have the option to not have a vaccine if they don’t want it, AND still have the freedom to go out and about. Anyone who attempts to forcibly inject something into someone else’s person should be arrested and charged with assault and battery, endangerment, and in the case of a child, child abuse.

More Intrusions in California

“Lawmakers” in California want to silence confessions in the church, by mandating that priests report possible instances of child abuse as heard in a confession. But, as Robert Wenzel notes in that post, the rulers will define “child abuse” however they wish.

So, if a priest hears someone in confession mentioning that his kid didn’t go to school, that might be seen by the ruling bureaucrats as “child abuse.” We do know that Kamala Harris wants to jail the parents of truant (i.e. disobedient, non-gubmint school-attending) children. Yes, they are that serious in their going after the young to indoctrinate them early on.

And what if the rulers see withholding of vaccines as child abuse, and the person in confession happens to mention that he doesn’t vaccinate the kids? Even though in some cases the opposite is true, it is the vaccinating of people that is abuse, when we know that many vaccines contain mercury and aluminum which negatively affect the child’s brain development.

The bureaucrats believe that a parent not providing a child enough “‘warmth,’ ‘attention,’ or ‘normal living experiences’” will be considered abuse, and the priest must turn in the now criminal suspect.

So, whatever is said in the privacy of a confession is between the priest and the parishioner, just like between the doctor and patient. I know it’s kind of an uneasy thing to say that we should trust priests to report child abuse based on the priest’s judgment, because we know that priests and archbishops have not been the most trustworthy when it comes to that kind of thing.

My point is, we shouldn’t trust the government to define what “child abuse” is, when we know about the nation’s CPS agencies and their record of placing kids in abusive foster homes, all the missing and dead kids under CPS supervision, and so on. But the people in charge especially in “human services” are getting crazier and they now see heterosexual parents raising kids and bringing them to church or private school as “abuse” now. i.e. many of the gubmint’s “child care” activists are nuts now.

When we have a society of freedom, people are free to discuss things in private and it stays in private. People will decide for themselves whether or not to vaccinate their kids. The gubmint stays out of the home and it stays out of the church and it stays out of the school.

Sadly, the California communists who want to control the kids don’t understand freedom. If you raise your kids in any way that’s not what the elitists dictate, then they will label you an “abuser,” and then probably take away your kids and hand them over to abusive foster homes.

News and Commentary

Jacob Hornberger on healthcare socialism versus healthcare freedom.

Doug Bandow says that Trump is just another jailer of the Cuban people.

The Intercept with an article on U.S. government-led coalition killing 1,600 civilians in Raqqa, Syria.

Michael Munger discusses capitalism in three principles.

Eoin Higgins says that Facebook has hired the same person involved in concocting the Patriot Act, as general counsel.

Richard Ebeling says that central banking is central planning.

And OrganicOlivia discusses Lyme Disease and the CDC cover-up.