Skip to content

Category: Bureaucracy

More News and Commentary

Glenn Greenwald: The ACLU, Prior to COVID, Denounced Mandates and Coercive Measures to Fight Pandemics

Life Site: How Americans Can Resist Coronavirus Shot Mandates – a Comprehensive Guide.

Liam Cosgrove: A Legacy of Corruption in the FDA and Big Pharma

Brian Joondeph: Is Covid a Pandemic of the Unvaccinated? Not Quite.

Mises.org Editors: Against Biden’s Mandates.

Olivia Rondeau: Non-Compliance Is an American Virtue That Stretches Back to Abolitionism (and Beyond)

Peter Skurkiss: If Your Employer Demands You Vaccinate, Don’t Quit

Becky Akers: Yep, Marxists Are Utterly Evil. But We Knew That

Vasko Kohlmayer: The Vaccines Do Not Stop Severe Covid or Death

Alliance for Natural Health: Medical Boards Threaten Doctors Who Spread ‘Covid Vaccine Misinformation’

Wilton Alston: Did We Actually Flatten the Curve?

Brian McGlinchey: How the FBI’s War on Drugs Helped 9/11 Happen

John Whitehead and Nisha Whitehead: 20 Years of Government-Sponsored Tyranny: The Rise of the Security-Industrial Complex from 9/11 to COVID-19

Joseph Mercola: Long-Term Dangers of Experimental mRNA Shots

Alex Berenson: Pay No Attention to the Spike Proteins behind the Curtain – British Researchers Find a Potential Mechanism for Covid Vaccine-Caused Heart Injury.

The Last Refuge: White House Extends National Election Emergency Granting Authority for Federal Intelligence Agencies to Enter State Election Databases for Mid-Term Election

Thomas DiLorenzo: Guess Who Else is Exempted from the Biden “Vaccine” Mandate

David Gordon: Review: Economy, Society, and History by Hans-Hermann Hoppe.

Edward Curtin: Review: “Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored” by Ray McGinnis

Patrick Eddington: Twilight of Liberty: 9/11’s Legacy

And RealClearInvestigations: Stark Contrasts: RealClearInvestigations’ Jan. 6-BLM Side-by-Side Comparison

The Truth about 9/11 on the 20th Year

Saturday is the 20th anniversary of the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks. So, a lot of people are going to have a lot of ceremonies and memorial services for all the people who died. There will be tributes to the people on Flight 93 and all the first responders who went back into the burning World Trade Center towers to save people.

But there will not be ceremonies and memorial services for the hundreds of thousands of people in the Middle East who were murdered throughout the 1990s by the U.S. military’s bombings and sanctions which destroyed water and sewer treatment centers, all caused by then-President George H.W. Bush’s war on Iraq starting in 1991, well before 9/11.

At the time following the September 11th, 2001 attacks, most people in the U.S. really believed the official government narrative, that “we” were just sitting here minding our own business and Islamic terrorists came over to attack us “because they hate us for our freedoms, etc.” Well, we, that is most of us, were minding our own business, but our military had started a war of aggression 10 years before that, in 1991 in Iraq, bombed and destroyed the Iraqi water and sewage treatment facilities and caused the Iraqis to have to use untreated water which led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians. Those war crimes and mass murders along with the U.S. military’s continued occupations throughout the Middle East, were what led to 9/11, which wouldn’t have happened if it were not for those actions.

But sadly, if someone at the time of 9/11 had brought any of that up, one would be called “terrorist sympathizers” and “traitors,” because the masses of sheeple at a time of crisis want to believe their leaders (or better, their liars, because that is what bureaucrats are), and the masses don’t want to be reminded of any bad things their own government has done to foreigners for the ten years prior to a large attack.

And the sheeple masses get very defensive if someone brings up the truth of actual history that happened before a major event like 9/11. That is because, sadly, most people are authoritarians and they submissively and obediently and gullibly believe whatever their rulers and authorities tell them. “They wouldn’t lie to us, would they?”

It’s the same thing with the Covid scam. We have a virus, allegedly, that kills one-tenth to two-tenths of one percent of the people who have the virus, a 99.9% survival rate, and most of the people who actually die from it have been mainly already very sick very elderly people with 3 or 4 comorbidities, and very obese people. We know that at least half of the people who have the virus have no symptoms and most of those who do have symptoms have “mild,” “flu-like” symptoms and they get over it.

Yet, the sheeple masses have allowed government criminals and imbeciles to order the people’s businesses shut down, ordering the people to have to stay at home for no good reason, impose this idiotic “social distancing” crap, impose mask orders when we know that masks don’t prevent transmission of respiratory viruses because the viruses are too small to be blocked, and now imposing vaccine mandates even though the “vaccines” don’t work and weren’t even intended to prevent infection or transmission of viruses! The vaccine nazis are out there now.

And now there’s a “surge” in “cases” and hospitalizations, which officials, bureaucrats and doctors are lying about for financial incentives and/or for political reasons, or they are just too ignorant and incompetent to know the truth.

We know that they have changed the definition of a “case” from anyone who is sick and has symptoms to just anyone who tests positive for the virus. We know that the positive test results from PCR tests are all false positives because of high cycle threshold numbers that the testers are turning back up at this time and probably intentionally. And “hospitalizations” means largely people who are already in the hospital for other non-Covid reasons but who tested positive for the virus that turned them into a “Covid case.” And ICUs are usually at high capacity in most circumstances and that is what hospitals want in order to make them money.

But the sheeple believe what government bureaucrats tell them and what the bureaucrats’ corporate media repeaters tell the sheeple, without doing any independent investigative research (I mean the sheeple as well as the brain-dead “news” media), just like after 9/11 and throughout this whole 20-year post-9/11 “war on terror,” which has been a war on freedom imposed by very sick people in Washington.

When the U.S. government closes down all U.S. military bases and “diplomatic” intrusions on foreign lands that are not U.S. territories and decides to cut it out with the invading, bombing, drone-striking, occupying foreign lands whose people don’t want their lands occupied, and murdering innocents overseas, then maybe we can better prevent retaliation on our own lands and actually have genuine security.

Another Covid Scamdemic Update

Joseph Mercola with an important article on the Covid “vaccine” enhancing Delta infectivity. The vaccinated are driving mutations, not the unvaccinated. There are several studies showing these things now. (Update: correction made.)

The Last Refuge on the ignorant Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus calling for doctors to avoid treating unvaccinated patients.

Meanwhile, Jon Rappoport says it’s illegal for you to know whether you have the Delta variant or not.

Children’s Health Defense explains how the “cure” for Covid, lockdowns and stay-in orders, has proven to be far worse than the disease.

Paul Joseph Watson: Forbes Deletes Article by Education Expert Asserting That Forcing Children to Wear Masks Causes Psychological Trauma, and ACLU Says the State Forcing People to Take Vaccines is a Victory For Civil Liberties

Stephen Lendman: Flu/Covid Mass-Jabbing Truth-Telling

And Ron Paul says that authoritarian vaccine mandates are the real threat.

FDA Approves the Pfizer mRNA “Vaccine” That’s Not a Vaccine

The FDA has rushed through approval of the Pfizer Covid “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine, that doesn’t provide immunity and doesn’t prevent infections or transmissions, and isn’t intended to.

In December, here is how the Children’s Health Defense reported on the FDA meeting to grant Emergency Use Authorization of the Pfizer experimental drug injection:

The FDA’s handpicked acting committee chairman, University of Michigan professor of epidemiology Dr. Arnold Monto, 87, punctuated the dialogue with efforts to hurry it along.

“Okay, we have many, many questions and we’re going to have to limit them.”

“We need to keep it brief.”

“No follow up. We’re pressed for time. I got 10 people who want to ask questions.”

“I’m going to excuse Dr. Fink” — Doran Fink of the FDA — “from having to answer that part of the question.”

“Okay, we’re going to not worry about adaptive and innate immune responses right now. We’ll take that offline.”

“I think we want to stay away from more discussions about immune response and other things that could be taken offline.”

Committee member A. Oveta Fuller, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Michigan, worried about potential side effects.

“So we have no idea what putting a messenger RNA lipid vaccine into people does long-term,” she said. “And we’re going from 20,000 people who get this vaccine to millions who get this vaccine with a very limited amount of risk assessment.”

But the rushed hearing seemed like it might have been “a dog and pony show for the public,” patient advocate Kim Witczak, the consumer representative on another FDA advisory committee, told the Project On Government Oversight (POGO).

Witczak said she was left shaking her head as questions were dismissed in disturbing fashion.

“I don’t think at the end of the day I had full trust in the process,” Witczak said.

It didn’t have to be that way, Peter Doshi, an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, noted in an email to POGO.

“I do not feel one should be rushing a decision like this. If the meeting required additional discussion, the meeting should have been extended,” Doshi said.

Monto, tapped to fill in as chairman of the committee, had received tens of thousands of dollars from companies working on coronavirus vaccines. According to a federal database, in 2018, Pfizer paid him a $3,500 consulting fee.

My, isn’t that a shock!

Jon Rappoport writes about the FDA’s now full approval this week of the Pfizer “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine, with no hearing and all taking place behind closed doors.

An 8/20 article in the BMJ (“Covid-19: FDA set to grant full approval to Pfizer vaccine without public discussion of data”) [3] quotes a few of these dissenting mainstream pros. For example:

“Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data.”

“’These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,’ she said. ‘The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval’.”

“Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a [public FDA] meeting ‘we have no idea what the data looks like’.”

“’It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,’ she said. ‘There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed’.”

“’Full approval of covid-19 vaccines must be done in an open public forum for all to see. It could set a precedent of lowered standards for future vaccine approvals’.”

Understand—this devastating criticism of the FDA is coming from a person who operates WITHIN the public-health establishment.

Don’t believe anything that government bureaucrats tell you, they are thoroughly corrupt, and a bunch of liars. FDA/CDC/NIH/HHS bureaucrats in bed with pharmaceutical flunkies.

But many people naively trust their bureaucrats in control because the government stenographers of the “news” media repeat their propaganda over and over and over until the lies become “facts.” And people don’t want to believe that the rulers are corrupt and lying to them and using them as guinea pigs and walking all over them and so forth.

With all the thousands and thousands of deaths now, and other injuries and paralysis associated with these untested, experimental drug injections, anyone who has been pressured, coerced or mandated to receive the injection and this mRNA experiment, and has severe reactions should sue the employer, venue, mayor, or agency that has inflicted the harm through coercion and mandates.

The bureaucrats of the FDA need to be criminally charged with fraud and other crimes. Bureaucrats, mayors and governors, and their “news” media repeaters have been either intentionally or ignorantly making millions of people wrongly believe that these dangerous experimental drug injections are safe (and not deadly), and that they actually prevent infections and transmission of the virus, when they were not even intended to prevent those things.

More Alleged Government Wheeling and Dealing, HHS, CDC, NIH, Etc.

Scott Hounsell of Red State wrote an article regarding CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky whose husband Loren Walensky received $5 million in HHS grants before she was the CDC director but while she was still “chair of the Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council,” part of National Institutes for Health, and a “member of the US Department of Health and Human Services Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents,” both government positions in which she worked closely with Dr. Anthony Fauci. (So-called “doctors”).

In fact, when “insiders” were surprised that Walensky was picked [for CDC director] , it was revealed that Fauci had a lot to do with her appointment

Now, regarding the questionable HHS grants given to Walensky’s husband, according to Hounsell,

In October 2019 Loren Walensky became the scientific co-founder and a member of the Board of Directors of Lytica Therapeutics, “an early-stage biotechnology company working on an innovative platform for developing next-generation antimicrobials.” (LabCentral)

Just four months later, Walensky’s Lytica received a $16.9 million dollar HHS grant to “develop antibacterial peptides with broad activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria.”  Only $5.3 million of that money was initially disbursed to Lytica, and the remaining $11.6 million is scheduled to be disbursed upon the achievement of “certain development milestones.” I have previously worked in the world of grant writing and can tell you most agencies will not give grants to organizations that have existed for less than a year and organizations that have no other stream of funding. In this particular case Crunchbase, which monitors funding for corporations and non-profits, shows that the only funding that Lytica has received to date is the $5.3 million allocated from the grant received.

And, don’t be too shocked:

The fact that Walensky’s grant was not disclosed as a portion of his wife’s [CDC] appointment amounts to a massive lack of transparency. In her financial disclosures, submitted January 13, 2021, she lists her husband’s interest in Lytica Therapeutics as a “spousal holding,” but doesn’t indicate that he is the co-founder of the company and ostensibly working there since he is the inventor of the technology subject to the CARB-X [government-funded] grant. She also doesn’t indicate in that filing that his company is receiving a federal grant from the very agency in which she’s being appointed to a leadership position – and the agency that still has to make decisions on whether to award the additional $11.6 million.

But wait, there’s more. In a subsequent article Hounsell writes of how the CDC then sent a CDC-employed “public affairs specialist” flunky to harass Hounsell regarding the aforementioned article. The flunky accused Hounsell’s article of being based on a “dubious tip” from talk radio personality Howie Carr, on whose show Hounsell appeared.

The flunky emailed the Howie Carr Show and stated, “A little extra digging and you would have found this was all smoke and no fire.”

Hounsell writes that the CDC flunky’s using the word “dubious” is uncalled for, given that Hounsell was “insistent on independently sourcing anything that made it to publishing…”

Throughout my weeks of reporting about the nefarious actions of the NIH, not once was I, or any of my sources, contacted by the NIH. This is completely out of the ordinary. The problem with smoke is that there is always fire. Things don’t give off smoke unless they have reached a temperature at which they are burning. At this point, we can add [the CDC flunky] Mr. McDonald’s trousers to the list of things that are on fire. A little extra digging wouldn’t have merited any change from the fact that the CDC Director’s husband’s 4-month-old company got a multi-million dollar grant from the HHS and had cashed out of the company after this infusion of cash.

Hounsell then sent the CDC flunky a list of questions of his own. Such as, “Were you instructed by any CDC leadership or anyone within Director Walensky’s office to make any contact with Howie Carr or RedState?”

And I especially liked the questions, “Is Director Walensky aware of the party held June 11th with Harvard Students? Were the students required to provide vaccine documentation? Were masks required? If an ‘abundance of caution’ is necessary, why would Loren Walensky not follow his own wife’s directive?”

Heh. I’m sure the Walenskys should have no problem paying for another mansion in the ritzy D.C. area like the $4 million mansion they now have in the ritzy part of Newton, Maskachusetts.

Anyway, like “Dr.” Fauci, we have yet another corrupt parasite employed by the U.S. government, and worse, in the health care industry. Given “Dr.” Rochelle Walensky’s record of ignorance and bad advice, such as advising that children wear the damn masks or be given an experimental pharmaceutical drug injection, I am not surprised by all this.

The Covid Scam Really Is a Scam, And a Hoax, And It Has to Stop

Are you as sick of the ongoing scamdemic as I am? Sorry to be spending so much time on that rather than writing about all the other important issues.

But now that the CDC is issuing more inconsistent and irrational guidelines and advisories regarding vaccines, masks, and other crapola, the scam is being exposed for what it is, a scam, and a hoax.

And I use the word “hoax” accurately here. We know that the “public health” officials, doctors and hospitals are turning up those PCR cycle threshold numbers at certain times, for the purpose of getting false positive test results.

Dr. Fauci himself said that false positives would happen if cycle threshold numbers were too high.

The familiar motive to artificially raise the numbers of “Covid cases,” in my view, seems very likely to do with Donald Trump’s recently resuming his campaign-style rallies.

The high PCR test cycle threshold numbers were used all last year to justify a “pandemic” hysteria based on false positives and a “casedemic,” and based on all the predicted “overwhelmed hospitals” that never happened, to justify calls for mail-in voting to better enable the ballot stuffers and cheaters to do their cheating. The reason many people don’t believe there was cheating and vote fraud is that our “news”casters told us repeatedly there was “no evidence,” which there is. And also, the Swamp didn’t like the effect that those 2016 Trump rallies had, so they prevented a repeat of that in 2020.

We saw the “case” numbers drop dramatically this whole year of 2021 after the W.H.O. advised, just after Biden was inaugurated on January 20th, that the Covid test cycle threshold numbers be lowered to weed out false positives. But now, when Trump returns to campaign rallies, it’s time to return to the higher numbers. Yes, TDS is now to a psychopathic degree. (And I’m not a Trump supporter, by the way, just a truth supporter.)

The second part of our further evidence that it is a made-up hoax is the CDC’s changing its guidelines in March 2020 as to what constitutes a “Covid death” to include non-Covid deaths on the list of “Covid deaths.” That list has included people who died of heart disease, heart attacks, kidney disease, cancer, gunshots, motorcycle accidents, and so on. But the deceased supposedly tested “positive” for Covid-19.

Last year, Dr. Deborah Birx addressed that aspect of this entire fraud:

So, the “600,000” deaths number is totally bogus. On the CDC’s own “provisional death counts” weekly updates page, the CDC states, “For over 5% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 4.0 additional conditions or causes per death.”

That same passage previously referred to more specifically “6%,” not “over 5%.” Before the recent change on that same page, according to this Wayback Machine snapshot, the CDC stated, “For 6% of the deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death.”

So they changed “6%” to “over 5%,” but they increased the average number of “additional conditions or causes per death” from 2.6 to 4.0! That means that the CDC revised upward the number of comorbidities that most of the people who died had.

Another aspect why this whole panic-incitement caused by psychopath bureaucrats and their media enablers is a hoax is the primary reason for lockdowns, business closures, masks and hysteria: that people who are “carriers” of the virus but have no symptoms are still spreading the virus. Not true.

Remember the mantra: “Stop the Spread”? The whole thing has been a lie.

Jon Rappoport pointed out that Dr. Fauci himself claimed, “In all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks.”

And don’t forget that Johns Hopkins published an article in which the writer noted that on average 2020 saw no real significant rise in deaths for the year, and that the reported deaths for the usual top causes such as heart disease dropped for the year. The explanation being that many of those usual heart and kidney disease and cancer deaths were being marked as “Covid deaths.” That article was then taken down by Johns Hopkins because it revealed too much of this criminal fraud and panic-incitement scheme we have been suffering for over a year and a half.

And so what else is happening besides the revival in Covid hysteria?

On a radio show yesterday morning a caller stated that he frequently donates blood to the Red Cross. Supposedly they test blood for Covid antibodies and tell donors if they tested positive for the Covid antibodies. But now, the caller says, the Red Cross let him know that they will no longer be doing that. The Red Cross will no longer test blood for Covid antibodies. Now, why would the Red Cross not test donated blood for Covid antibodies? Something doesn’t sound right there.

And then yesterday on LewRockwell.com, we read:

Writes my friend:

Hi Lew,

I donated blood to the Red Cross a few weeks ago.  Today I got an email from someone at the Red Cross inviting me to take a survey on Covid-19.  When I followed the link for the survey I was shocked to see the following:

We are contacting you because you tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (i.e. we did not detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in your blood). Antibodies generally are detectable if one has been infected with the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 in the past or received a COVID-19 vaccine.

This bothers me on several points.  First, is this an initial step towards using the Red Cross to persuade me to take the vaccine?  Second, this seems to be an invasion of privacy.  Third, it makes me wonder who else they have shared this information with.

I didn’t go any further with the survey.  I will no longer donate blood to the Red Cross.

And then yesterday on the Glenn Beck radio show Dave Rubin was talking about the California recall election/ballot initiative. So, my own conclusion is now, as far as another reason why the revival in Covid “cases” or “casedemic,” the California recall is in just two months. That means the activists have to ramp up the Covid hysteria and panic, just like last year, to get California voters to insist on mail-in balloting, just like last year as mentioned above.

Unless people rise up and get our government officials to cut it out and stop lying about this scamdemic, and unless the people make the “public health” officials stop fabricating “cases” and inciting panic and hysteria, then all this crap, this criminal Orwellian crapola is just going to continue, the kids are going to continue to be even more screwed up than they already are, and we’re going to have fascist requirements to make life miserable for everyone for no good reason and employers and schools or colleges with more “vaccine” mandates to make people worse off and put more people in worse health!

This will continue to 2022 elections, and 2024 elections, and it will go beyond just elections, as it already has. The society is literally going crazy now, and I hope people put a stop to it.

The “Vaccine” Scam and Non-Consensual Human Experimentation

I know I keep going on about this Covid scamdemic and the “vaccines” that aren’t vaccines. But as long as everything I hear in the “news” on the radio or read in mainstream “news” outlets are nothing but government propaganda and not the actual truth and facts of the situation, then I feel compelled to write.

This push to “vaccinate” everyone with foreign substances is now a fanatical crusade. We’re talking about an alleged virus in which most of the people who have the virus have no symptoms, or if they do have symptoms they have “mild flu-like symptoms.” I’m sure you’ve heard that. The infection fatality rate is between .1 and .2% — that’s between one-tenth and two-tenths of one percent.

The survival rate is literally 99.9%. Our society, if it’s still a “society,” needs to cut it out with the ignorance and hysteria, and stop believing the liars in the government.

So here I go again with more on the Covid scamdemic.

This article by Emily Miller of “Emily Posts” tells of the Harris-Biden administration’s new “We Can Do This” (sic) initiative to go intrusively “door-to-door” to invade people’s privacy and terrorize innocent people as a stasi medical fascism way to get people to submit to the dangerous experimental Covid drug injections.

The article quotes Kommie-la Harris as saying that people don’t have time or the pharmacy isn’t open when they do have time, in other words people make excuses for “not getting vaccinated” (i.e. not getting assaulted by an experimental injection for no good reason). Kommie-la then says that a big problem is “misinformation”!! Let’s make sure to tell the sheeple that the “vaccines” are “safe and effective.” Yeah, right, Kommie.

And she has it backwards. The GOVERNMENT is the source of the “misinformation”! Including the CDC changing its guidelines as to what constitutes a Covid death to include non-Covid deaths as “Covid deaths,” such as heart attacks and heart disease (which we know as a fact now the “vaccines” are causing!), diabetes, gunshots and motorcycle accidents, and so forth. And telling us the numbers of “cases” based on false positive tests and in which a “case” is no longer someone who is actually sick and has actual symptoms but anyone who merely tests positive (based on false positive test results based on high cycle threshold numbers). Sorry, Kommie-la, you people are full of you-know-what.

And this article by nurse Sheila Holt on the American Thinker discusses the genetic editing aspect of the experimental Covid injections. The article gives some important information you won’t find in the New York Slimes or on your local TV “news”cast. Ms. Holt notes toward her conclusion:

The push and coercion for societal vaccinations is the warning bell.  Society has to trust the people in charge to be more than ethical.  If the words population control are connected to even one of the vaccination powers that be, then governments, businesses, and families must question the intent.  Keep in mind that viruses like HIV have been known and researched for almost fifty years in attempts to find a vaccination, to no avail.  It is reasonable to question how a warp-speed vaccine was developed in less than a year for a novel coronavirus.  Maybe the answer circles back to CRISPR and genetic editing.  But can there be more to the hypnotic way governments, pharmaceutical, medical communities, and families are obviously taken with this new experiment?

As I said, she gives a lot of information you probably won’t get from Rachel Madcow or Jake Tapdancer. Or even Sean Hannity, with Fox Snooze being shills for Big Pharma.

So, Ms. Holt points out the gene editing aspect of the mRNA “vaccines.”

The way I see it, the intruder gene-editing mRNA injected into its victim literally takes over one’s whole system, one’s immune system, and overrules one’s own natural immune responses. When one is in contact with a virus, the invader “gene editor” will go wild and attack one’s organs. A lot of people can’t handle such reactions. It also messes up one’s own natural anti-inflammatory responses, and this is why people assaulted with the experimental injections are having heart inflammation and other inflammatory reactions.

I had already read that if you have a preexisting inflammatory condition, it is not a good idea to expose yourself to these experimental medical injections.

And further on the gene editing aspect, I had previously linked to this article from Health Impact News, in which Brian Shilhavy writes:

Catherine [Austin Fitts] compared the new mRNA COVID vaccines to a computer operating system, stating that just like computer operating systems such as Windows, that there would be a “back door” where the technocrats will be able to control our bodies through regular “updates.”

I thought it was a brilliant analogy of what the technocrats seek to accomplish with this new class of vaccines.

Well, it turns out this was NOT an “analogy” at all! Moderna, the manufacturer of one of the COVID mRNA vaccines that has currently been issued emergency use authorization, has actually published on their website that this is true: the mRNA vaccine injects an “operating system” into your body that they call “The Software of Life.”

And he quoted from Moderna’s own website (which I found here):

Recognizing the broad potential of mRNA science, we set out to create an mRNA technology platform that functions very much like an operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can plug and play interchangeably with different programs. In our case, the “program” or “app” is our mRNA drug – the unique mRNA sequence that codes for a protein.

Generally, the only thing that changes from one potential mRNA medicine to another is the coding region – the actual genetic code that instructs ribosomes to make protein. Utilizing these instruction sets gives our investigational mRNA medicines a software-like quality. We also have the ability to combine different mRNA sequences encoding for different proteins in a single mRNA investigational medicine.

So, I don’t know what to say to all those “vaccine” stasi out there going door-to-door to pressure or coerce their neighbors to be guinea pigs for this techno-fascist crap. There are already millions and millions of victimized gullible guinea pigs out there now. Who knows how they will respond when the regular cold and flu season arrives.

Most of the “vaccinated” victims don’t know that they are being experimented on by demented, deranged mad scientists. And some do know about this but they are being made to get “the Jab” by their employers, which is actually illegal according to the FDA’s own rules regarding experimental drugs and especially regarding their giving these new “vaccines” Emergency Use Authorization.

We know that much of the scamdemic has been made up by the bureaucrats in control, from the very beginning. Bureaucrats such as Wretchen Witless, Andrew Coomo and our Alzheimer’s-in-Chief are drooling to impose fascist lockdown orders on Amerika once again, and for no good reason.

And by the way, the “Delta variant,” that Dr. Anthony Mengele Fauci says is the “greatest threat” to us? Total fraud and a scam. Like all the rest of this whole fiasco. This whole thing is a scam.

The Latest Covid Update

Edward Curtin: What I Know and Don’t Know about SARS-CoV-2 Virus.

Association of American Physicians and Surgeons: Majority of Physicians Decline Covid Shots, According to Survey.

Arjun Walia: Pfizer and Moderna Fail To Respond To British Medical Journal About Covid Vaccine Safety Concerns, and Study Finds Many Uninfected Adults Still Have Strong Pre-Existing Antibody Protection Against Covid.

Megan Redshaw: EU Approves Covid Passport: Here’s How It Works — and Why the U.S. Doesn’t Have One, and 5th Exec Joins Moderna Billionaire Club — as Stock Price Soars Despite Growing Number of Injury Reports.

And Joseph Mercola: Who Owns Big Pharma + Big Media? You’ll Never Guess.

My 2012 Article on Obama Drones and “Kill List”

We are now seeing the Obiden administration and its corrupt FBI issuing proclamations labeling conservatives, libertarians, people who claim the election was stolen, and non-leftists as “domestic terrorists” and the gubmint threatening people with arrest and indefinite detention, i.e. unconstitutionally and criminally. Amerikan gestapo goons are already arresting and detaining innocent citizens who may or may not have even been at the January 6th Trump rally and/or Capitol trespass and riot. Fascist bureaucrats and activists are also calling for people to snitch on their family members, friends, coworkers, and neighbors for saying something that might be considered “racist” or un-PC and turn them in to the government.

Well, in January I had already reprinted my 2010 article Tea Partiers May Need the ACLU Soon, but now I will reprint here my 2012 LewRockwell.com article Americans Proudly Voting for Evil regarding then-President Obama’s drone strikes killing mainly innocent civilians overseas and “Kill List” that Americans either didn’t know about or they did know but approve of these policies. In other words, what I’ve been saying is that especially conservatives and “national security” supporters are coming to regret such support.

So, here is my 2012 article Americans Proudly Voting for Evil. (Note: a couple of links might no longer work, but most do. Links open on the same tab.)

November 1, 2012

As our society continues to rapidly decay, we have a presidential election in which the zombies will be out there in droves voting for the two statists, Obama and Romney.

The conservatives continue to support an aggressive and belligerent foreign policy – despite all its blowback – that includes indiscriminate drone bombings and murders of innocent foreigners. So much for being “pro-life.”

These days, warmongers who claim to be Christian have lost touch with their Christianity, so it seems. The arrogant and narcissistic attitude of “American Exceptionalism” far supersedes traditional Judeo-Christian moral values with todays conservatives. So despite Romney’s many left-leaning problems, he will probably get the conservatives and the Exceptionalists’ vote.

And the progressives – many of them will vote for Obama, knowing full well about the Obama Administration’s drone-murders of innocents, and other anti-human rights, anti-civil liberties acts of immorality and criminality.

In a recent article on identifying and rejecting evil, Arthur Silber uses two articles, one from the New York Times and another from the Washington Post, to show how the Obama Administration not only wants its murder program known to the American people, but is doing so proudly.

The program in question is the U.S. President’s assassinations of “terrorists,” or “terrorist supporters,” without due process, and without the President being required to present evidence against the accused.

So really we are talking about suspected terrorists. And worse, most of those who have been murdered overseas by Obama’s drone bombings have been innocent civilians and not actual terrorists [.pdf].

To cover themselves, as noted in the earlier NYT article, the Obama Administration has defined as “militants” (and thus worthy of a U.S. Presidential execution by drone) “all military-age males” who were unfortunate enough to find themselves in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Silber notes how, while the Obama Administration (through its propaganda organs the Times and the Post) wants the American people to know about its murder program and that these officials are proud of it, most Americans nevertheless remain unaware of the implications of such a program. Silber writes:

Americans cannot legitimately claim ignorance of the immense evil being perpetrated by their government. They will not be able to claim, as others have tried to do in the past: “We never knew about the horrors that were being committed. How can you believe that we knew about that?”

Americans know all about it, in horrifying, endless detail. The State wants them to know. But the State knows that almost all Americans will refuse to admit what it means. Americans have chosen to sleepwalk blindly into the mouth of Hell.

However, while the Times, the Post and many amongst the MSM act as spokesmen for the Obama Administration’s drone-murder program, there are nevertheless many people who still don’t know about them, about Obama’s “kill list” and Obama’s NDAA provision of indefinite detention of Americans, and so forth. In this video, an interviewer talks to Obama supporters who can’t believe that those policies are Obama’s. And in this video, the same ignorance is shown by a sitting U.S. Congresswoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And in this video, former Homeland Security Sec. Tom Ridge exemplifies many Americans’ cluelessness about the Obama “kill list,” and their lack of understanding of the meaning of a government program that administers death arbitrarily without any legality or due process.

But in his aforementioned article, Silber continues with a reference to German political theorist Hannah Arendt, the author of The Origins of Totalitarianism, and how the Post article is describing what could be referred to as the bureaucratization of terror. Silber writes:

Always remember that what these “U.S. officials” and “senior Obama administration officials” are discussing is the murder of human beings, including the murder of entirely innocent human beings. But they speak of a “disposition matrix,” and the “accounting of the resources being marshaled,” in the manner that might be used to discuss office supplies. “Oh, dear, we need more paperclips. Staplers, too.” “Hmm. This group of men — there seem to be about ten or twelve of them — seems to be engaged in a ‘suspicious pattern of activity.’ We’d better dispose of them.”

In his previous essay, Accomplice to Murder, Silber presents a scenario regarding a possible future for the very Americans who currently are knowingly supporting their government’s use of drones and indiscriminate murders of totally innocent human beings overseas. The rationalization by the government, of course, is the accusation of being “material supporters” to terrorism, with the government’s hired guns acting on behalf of the President as judge, jury and executioners. To the bureaucrats, even someone’s leaving comments on a blog that are critical of the government’s foreign policy could be considered “providing material support” to terrorism.

In a more high-profile example, American Muslim cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was killed after having been targeted by Obama, without any due process, without Obama presenting any evidence against the accused.

Al-Awlaki had been a harsh critic of U.S. government foreign policy, and had used his religious sermons as a means to express his criticisms, expressions entirely protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

In Accomplice to Murder, Silber points out the similarities between Romney and Obama in their support of the indiscriminate drone murders of entirely innocent human beings. Silber notes that, while a vote for Romney or Obama amounts to support for the government’s drone-murder program and the killing of innocent human beings, he describes the people who nevertheless refuse to understand this, citing people such as Daniel Ellsberg and Noam Chomsky. Silber takes great pains to explain how voting for the lesser of two evils (in the case of his examples, progressives nevertheless voting for Obama), is still a show of support for evil, but states succinctly (his bold):

As I have written before: “the claim of a ‘right’ to dispense death arbitrarily — the claim that the State may murder anyone it chooses, whenever it desires — constitutes a separate category altogether, a category of which this particular claim is the sole unit. When death is unleashed, all possibility of action is ended forever.” For this reason — and it is the only reason required — it is not “perfectly rational and reasonable” to decide that “the evils of their candidate are outweighed by the evils of the GOP candidate.”

There is no evil beyond the claimed “right” to murder by arbitrary edict, to murder anyone, anywhere, anytime. If you support this particular evil — and if you vote for Obama, you support it — then you will support anything.

I very much recommend those two articles by Arthur Silber, The Refusal to Identify and Reject Evil, and Accomplice to Murder (the latter which may be quite lengthy but well worth your time). And in an even more recent article (NB: some profanity), Silber makes very clear just how deranged and psychopathic our rulers really are.

But regarding the increasingly transparent status of mainstream news media as government spokespeople, such as the New York Times and the Washington Post have shown, as I pointed out here and here, these outlets now are not particularly biased to the left or to the right, or liberal or conservative, but mainly are biased toward the State. This authoritarian deference to the State by the news media has grown especially since 9/11. Civil liberties expert Glenn Greenwald expressed just recently,

That is what explains why the US media has been so obsequious first with George Bush and now with his Democratic successor (for those who doubt that “the liberal media” venerated Bush as much as [Michael Lewis and Douglas Brinkley] do Obama, I’ll remind you of this still-remarkable, borderline pornographic display of giddy fawning on Mission Accomplished Day, or the fact that Bush’s own Press Secretary wrote a book mocking the US media for how “deferential” it was to the Bush White House). It’s why journalists joyously dance with top officials, swing on their tires, are creepily grateful when they’re sprayed in the face by their squirt guns, and play fun beach games with the very campaign officials they’re ostensibly covering.

Just this week, with one nauseating item of misinformation and pro-State propaganda after another in each editorial: The New York Times: “we enthusiastically endorse President Barack Obama for a second term…” The Washington Post: “Four more years for President Obama…”

Hooray! Four more years of drone bombings of innocents that provokes foreigners and makes us less safe, four more years of the drug war, ObamaCare, Dodd-Frank, stimulus, illegal warrantless wiretapping, and the TSA and DHS violating the American people!

With a Fourth Estate like this, who needs Goebbels?

But the mainstream news media’s growing subservience to the State merely reflects that of the masochistic American people in general, in my view.

So at the same time that the Times and the Post proudly advertise Obama’s “kill list” and drone-murder policies (as mentioned at the beginning of this article), the American people’s ignorance and infantilism nevertheless grow and grow, particularly their ignorance of the meaning of these policies and of the increasing probability of such policies’ subsequent domestic usage.

Silber points out how during Nazi Germany the Germans actually did know about their government’s policies of murdering innocents. Silber cites the book, Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany by Robert Gellately.

As with the rise in authoritarianism and submissiveness toward the State here in the U.S., Gellately discovered how the news media played an active role in promoting the State, and how, like the American DHS program of “If You See Something, Say Something,” it was really the German people who willingly and enthusiastically turned in their neighbors (but the Gestapo not as much).

Now, I have described in various articles how totalitarian a police state America has become, with its bureaucratic Berlin Wall, and its being like the Iranian SAVAK, like North Korea, and like Nazi Germany.

I know, a lot of people feel uncomfortable with these assertions. But when things really are happening, and our own government really is doing all these things – and it is getting worse by the day – then it takes some courage to face these realities. Being in denial will not protect you from the State’s evil crimes.

And now, in addition to the many other articles to which I have linked detailing what a police state America has become, there has been yet another article, this one describing how the government intends to treat “doomsday preppers” as terrorists. And this despite the government’s own preparations for various disastrous events, as noted in that article.

Meanwhile, the real terrorists are those who fire drones and indiscriminately bomb and murder totally innocent human beings, targeting rescuers and funerals, and who engage in counter-productive security theater for no good reason, molesting and groping little children and yelling “freeze” to intentionally frighten the public for no damn good reason!

Americans have been letting their government bureaucrats get away with murder, while at the same time the government with all its unjust, intrusive and immoral laws and procedures has been criminally persecuting totally innocent Americans!

Well, I agree with Jacob Hornberger, President of the Future of Freedom Foundation, who believes that we need an “American Spring.”

Americans had better wake up and realize that the idea of “limited government” is impossible. They need to recognize the true evils of centralization and central planning, and maybe then will they understand that the way to reverse the evil is to totally decentralize and desocialize America.

But sadly, many Americans are zombies these days, addicted to TV and obsessed with their cell phones and their texting nonsense while compulsively checking emails from nobody. The zombies who vote will proudly vote for The Obomber or his pal Rombo, knowing what their policies are, but not really understanding the real implications of those policies, to our detriment.

Copyright © 2012 by LewRockwell.com (Link to article)

More News and Commentary

James Bovard: The Media Wants You to Trust Washington Again Now That Trump Is Gone.

Andrew Napolitano: Can Federal Judges Alter the Constitution?

Brian Shilhavy: CDC: Death Toll Following Experimental COVID Injections Now at 4,434 – More than 21 Years of Recorded Vaccine Deaths from VAERS.

Thomas Knapp: Peace in Palestine? Not if American Politicians Can Help It.

Jacob Hornberger: Splinter the CIA into a Thousand Pieces and Scatter It to the Winds

Charles Burris: JFK’s War with the National Security Establishment

Robert Wenzel: Biden’s Infrastructure Bill Includes Making Neighborhoods Across America “Diverse” and Council of Economic Advisers Goes Woke and Calls for Massive New Government Control and Spending

Jon Rappoport: Pandemic: Follow the Real Money, the Unthinkable Amount of Money.

Gary Barnett: Considering the ‘Covid’ Lie: This Is No time for Diplomacy, It Is a Time for Truth

Sheldon Richman: FDA Targets Black and Other Minority Smokers

Abigail Devereaux: Restricting the Unvaccinated Sets a Dangerous Precedent.

Joseph Mercola: The Real Reason Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos and Google Want You to Eat Lab-Grown ‘Meat’

And Edward Curtin: Second Stage Terror Wars

Instead of “Packing the Supreme Court,” Let’s UNpack the Supreme Court

OMG, Schumer, Nadler and Markey want to “pack the Supreme Court,” by adding 4 more Democrat “Justices” to the existing 9 Supreme Bureaucrats. They want to do this because they really believe that the current Court has a 6-3 “conservative” majority! Yes, they really believe that.

The reason that the Sheeplecrats want to “pack the Supreme Court” is because they are too impatient to wait for a “Justice” to retire (or die) and be replaced by one that’s more to their liking.

So they impatiently drool to ram their dictatorial mandates and tax-thefts down the throats of the people more quickly by getting a faux “Supreme” Court to rubber-stamp their agenda. And with HR 1 all future elections will belong to them, these thieves, cheaters, fraudsters, hooligans, barbarians and shysters.

And it isn’t just Democrats who are the criminals and thieves and extortionists, the Republicans are bad, too. (See Laurence Vance’s articles exposing the conservatives and Republicans‘ corruption, ignorance and hypocrisy, for example, when it comes to their proclaiming to promote “limited government,” “free markets” and “liberty.” i.e. they’re FOS just as much as the Democrats and “liberals.”)

No, rather than packing the Supreme Commissars, I say, let’s UNpack them, by just getting rid of the whole thing. They really suck, when you get right down to it.

The 9 robed goons are unreliable, unsupportive of the Constitution, incapable of defending liberty, and they are just all around nothing more than Soviet-like apparatchiks, quite frankly.

The truth is, what we have at the top of the U.S. so-called judicial system is a Supreme Swamp, because that is exactly what those “Justices” are, just another part of the Swamp in Washington.

The Supreme Court rarely comes to the side of the rights of the individual and private property against the threats and aggressions of the government and police.

For example, while some of the current “Justices” were not there 10 years ago, at that time the High Swamp high-fived the jailing and strip searching of arrestees who were abducted for non-arrestable offenses, such as walking a dog sans leash or for unpaid parking tickets.

The Republican appointees were the ones who voted to approve such criminal treatment of presumably innocent folks. Hence, “Rethuglicans.”

But “liberals” are also useless when it comes to civil liberties. Also around that time the Court rubber-stamped the government’s drug gestapo breaking into people’s home, terrorizing them and abducting them because police smelled marijuana and heard a toilet flushing, implying people were “destroying evidence,” even though such evidence was not that of an actual crime with an actual victim.

And obviously with an 8-1 decision, several of the “liberals” on the High Swamp agreed with the usual conservative authoritarian neanderthals, that the drug war police state is so important that we must allow government police to criminally and violently break into a home and terrorize and abduct innocent people for ingesting non-approved drugs. “Liberals” Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer joined the “conservative” neanderthals in this one, with Ruth Bader Ginsburg actually citing that dusty ol’ Fourth Amendment in her lone dissent.

Sorry, morons, the real and only legitimate ruling to that case is to rule the entire drug war unconstitutional, because the government involving itself in drugs is not authorized by the U.S. Constitution. And, does the individual own one’s own life and body or does the government own one’s life and body? Duh, Elena, Sonia, Clarence, et al.

The 9 robed Swamp Supremes are loathsome and corrupt, and are the lap dogs for the fascists in the White House and the communists in CONgress, and they are useless. Bought and paid for, or otherwise bribed to do the fascists bidding as well as being obedient State-worshiping ignoramuses, that is what these people are.

Chief “Justice” (sic) John Roberts suddenly switched his vote of ruling the ObamaCare law unconstitutional to his joining the Obama apparatchiks to approve the ObamaCare law and the individual mandate. Was Roberts threatened, or blackmailed? NSA whistleblower Russ Tice told how NSA abuses made high public officials susceptible to blackmail, and other NSA whistleblowers including Edward Snowden and William Binney backed those assertions.

They will be even worse now when they see government officials and juries deciding cases out of fear of being attacked by social activist thugs engaged in “peaceful” protests, and out of fear of their homes being burned to the ground.

And the Supreme Sheeple then approved ObamaCare a second time in 2015, and its subsidies, further empowering the criminal IRS. “The Affordable Care Act is here to stay,” said Barack Obomber, reinforced later by traitor John McCain who voted against repealing it.

The High Supreme Swamp also ruled against the Fifth Amendment in its Kelo decision to allow local governments to steal private property away from the owner and redistribute it over to other private citizens for financial profits. That was a no-brainer, but John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, and the only remaining one of them left now Stephen Breyer thought otherwise.

And Scalia? An “Originalist”? Heh. Scalia of course sided with the drug war police state in the aforementioned decision, is questionable on the 2nd Amendment, rejected private property rights and self-ownership in favor of collectivist moral legislating, and obediently accepted the government’s bogus war on terror to justify violating the due process rights of detainees. (And, while he wasn’t endorsing internment camps, he even pointed out that internment camps à la World War II could return again in good ol’ USS of A.)

And Amy Coney Barrett? What a disappointment, even before she crawled up to the High Slimy Bench. In a lower court decision, Barrett sided with the other two fascists in her three-judge panel of the 7th Circus approving Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D-McDonald’s) unconstitutional Covid lockdown orders and limits on gatherings.

As I pointed out in an earlier blog, constitutionalist pastor Chuck Baldwin noted that based on her previous opinions Barrett will probably rubber-stamp the COVID police state and forced vaccines, and probably the surveillance state as well.

All these Supreme Court “Justices” (sic) defend the police state, the national security state, and seem to obediently believe the government’s false flags and fabrications to justify enslaving and imprisoning the population to “protect” them from the foreign bogey man, and from their own vices.

Brett Kavanaugh. Yech. Total authoritarian apparatchik police statist swamp creature. Included in lower court rulings Kavanaugh voted in favor of CIA covering up of the JFK assassination, and other national security state interests.

I wrote in an earlier blog on Kavanaugh’s deference to the national security state regarding the bulk collection of telephony metadata. This Cato article quotes Kavanaugh’s lower court opinion from 2015:

The Fourth Amendment allows governmental searches and seizures without individualized suspicion when the Government demonstrates a sufficient “special need” – that is, a need beyond the normal need for law enforcement – that outweighs the intrusion on individual liberty

The Fourth Amendment says nothing about there being a “special need” of government law enforcement that “outweighs” the right to be secure.

Does the Fourth Amendment say regarding our right to be secure, “except for a special need of law enforcement”? Nope.

Kavanaugh writes (with my comments inserted):

In my view, that critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy occasioned by this program. The Government’s program does not capture the content of communications [Yes it does, with phone calls and emails as well!], but rather the time and duration of calls, and the numbers called.

Besides being ignorant of the feds’ ongoing criminal intrusions against innocent people, Kavanaugh also cites “drug testing of students, roadblocks to detect drunk drivers, border checkpoints, and security screening at airports” as examples of allowable violations of the Fourth Amendment.

In a different case, while the Court’s “liberals” in the majority voted to protect the right of the people and their cell phone data to not be tracked, the neanderthal “conservatives” who love the police state say, no, we think that gestapo Amerikan police goons must be permitted to track people’s cell phone data without a warrant, without reasonable suspicion, because we really don’t support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and its Fourth Amendment, as we swore an oath to do. (And that case included Neil Gorsuch with the other conservatards who love the police state. So much for that guy.)

So, the Government Supremacists cite “exigent circumstances” when they know the gubmint goons are violating someone’s Fourth Amendment rights but they don’t care, such as in the case of permitting police to draw blood from an unconscious motorist who had already parked his van and was walking about. So, the Supreme Swampers themselves are goons and thugs, in my view. The Supreme Thugs is really what they are.

But back to Supreme Thug Brett Kavanaugh, in at least 3 “national security” (sic) cases Kavanaugh rubber-stamped the holding of terrorism suspects without charge or actual suspicion or evidence at the Guantanamo prison. (al-Bihani v. Obama, Uthman v. Obama, and Omar v. McHugh.) He might as well be an employee of the CIA. So, what if Gubmint suspected you conservatives of “insurrection” or “domestic terrorism,” for example, you want their goons abducting you without evidence or warrants and to be imprisoned indefinitely? You want that? Duh, conservatives.

Conservatives defended Kavanaugh in his nomination battle, but they don’t realize that Kavanaugh is a staunch “social justice” defender of Title IX. As he stated before the Senate Judiciary Committee, “Title IX helped make girls’ and women’s sports equal. And I see that law’s legacy every night when I walk into my house, as my daughters are getting back from lacrosse or basketball or hockey practice.” So obviously he is clueless as to the abuses of Title IX to enable false accusations of hapless males especially in college. Duh, “conservatives.”

Speaking of “social justice” (sic), the Supreme Swamp also shows what unprincipled gutless wonders they are in their attempting to defend a baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding, but for the wrong reasons, a decision based on anything but the private property rights they should be upholding but seem to have no clue as to what that actually is.

And why didn’t the Supreme Bureaucrats overturn the “Defense of Marriage Act,” or any of the states’ impositions or state referendums on protecting or forbidding gay marriage? Why do legislatures or CONgress get themselves involved with the people’s private matters? As I wrote in this article, you own your own life and have a right to form whatever contracts with others you want, as long as it’s voluntary. Marriage is none of the State’s damn business!

The gutless Supreme Apparatchiks also showed how they view freedom of the Press by declining to hear journalist James Risen’s case on protecting a confidential source. They obediently and pathologically defend the national security state no matter what. But, they merely reflect the Amerikan True Believers. Oh, well.

And on freedom of speech, the “Justices” (sic) all oppose free speech when the other Party is the one being opposed, with socialism-dreaming “liberal” Elena Kagan possibly being the worst of them.

I’m sure the sheeple Democrats and Republicans would go running to the Supreme Nannies to get their permission on whether the people of the states can make use of the 10th Amendment to nullify federal edicts.

But, real Americans will nullify fascist orders and intrusions whether the Supreme Bureaucrats like it or not.

Tom Woods wrote a terrific book on the history of nullification in America and how it should be used currently:  Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century. Woods addresses objections to nullification on this page. (And see this, this, and this.)

I wish I could advocate “packing the Supreme Court” with libertarians and voluntaryists who believe in the non-aggression principle, private property rights, self-ownership, freedom of contract and freedom of association, but that’s not realistic.

No, the answer is to UNpack the Supreme Court and “throw the bums out,” along with the rest of the horrible central planning apparatus in criminal Washington. You bet.

The Latest Covid-Shmovid Developments

What has happened in the past year? Well, there had been a lot of bureaucrat and media propaganda and fear mongering last year to brainwash the Amerikan sheeple to believe in Covid and frighten the masses to fear being near anyone who might have Covid, like it’s the Plague or Ebola, which it’s not. Far from it. Covid is just about equal to the seasonal flu, despite what the propagandist liars have been telling us.

To reiterate once again, people supposedly died of Covid mainly elderly who were already dying of serious illnesses or had serious conditions like obesity and diabetes. The Covid survival rate of elderly people, age 70 and up, is 94.6%, and otherwise the rate of survival is 99.8% according to the CDC. As I have mentioned repeatedly, the official U.S. Covid death toll, that 545,000 figure now, has been an intentional lie by the CDC who changed its guidelines on what constitutes a “Covid death” to include non-Covid deaths as “Covid deaths.” The scamdemic has been a lie from the beginning.

A lot of people say, “Well I was very sick, almost croaked,” and “I know several people who were very sick ‘with Covid’ and some died! Covid is REAL, dammit!” Well, no, not if they were given false positive diagnoses with the PCR test that gives a huge number of false positives. Chances are, in my view, many of these people had a cold or flu and such cold or flu symptoms worsened by the damn masks that cause oxygen deprivation and bacteria build-up that gets into their lungs which can cause bacterial pneumonia and can cause more inflammation and fluid accumulation, difficulty breathing, etc. My guess then is the hysterical, propagandized mask wearers felt much hysteria and FEAR that was propagandized into them by the lying, dishonest bureaucRATs and ignorant media, felt a lot of panic and rushed to doctor or hospital who gave them terrible pharma drugs or worse, a ventilator.

In many cases, in my view, the masks have been making people sick! Now, I have seen many “mainstream” websites online claiming that such assertions have been “debunked,” but really these mainstreamers are shills for Big Pharma and The Bureaucracy and they’ll debunk anything that isn’t government-approved CDC-NIH-CIA-approved official narrative. The “mainstream” websites are a part of the Covid Cult now.

And that’s another thing. I heard on the radio that people who have preexisting inflammatory issues should NOT take the Covid “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine, because the “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine actually provokes an inflammatory response! That is why many people now have had terrible reactions to the “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine.

By the way, that inflammatory illness in children associated with Covid, that is similar to Kawasaki disease? A likely cause of that is that today’s kids have been flooded and assaulted with many, many vaccines by the time they are 6! Talk about criminal.

Another item in the news is that people who have had “Covid” are complaining of lingering, post-Covid symptoms such as loss of taste and smell, numbness and anxiety. However, I think that those might very well be side effects of the pharmaceutical drugs that had been given to people being treated for Covid (or Fauxvid whatever it is), or caused by over-the-counter drugs. Are there side effects of vitamin D and zinc?

So, after the Covid nightmare seems to be winding down now and states are loosening their fascist distancing and mask mandates and other restrictions, we are now hearing about an uptick or possible new surge in “cases.” That is probably because the bureaucrats can see how the people are getting out and enjoying their freedom again — and the bureaucrats HATE that! They hate it, because The Bureaucracy is filled with psychopathic narcissists who hate to see others experiencing joy and happiness, so the BureaucRATs use their powers to try to stifle the masses and suppress their joy and freedom, out of envy and all the repressed rage that many of the deranged control freaks of The Bureaucracy have.

So I think the medical fascists are once again turning up the Cycle Threshold numbers in the CPR test results to resume the artificially inflated “case” numbers to say “there’s an uptick or new surge in cases”. They can’t let go of the powers and control they have grabbed for themselves over the people, power and control they have exploited the “Covid crisis” to grab.

And just how did putting the masses under house arrest and closing down businesses prevent Covid from killing off the entire population? As we have seen now in the comparison of freedom-loving Florida and the “blue” states led by fascist psychopaths who locked down their states, the Covid deaths were no higher in Florida (or at least per capita) than in California and its fellow “blue” states such as the Eastern Bloc states of New York New Jersey and the New England states.

Speaking of the Eastern Bloc of New England states, the new “Commerce” Secretary Gina Raimondo, former governor of Rhode Island, is really an Anti-Commerce Secretary, in her not only locking down Rhode Island and closing down businesses as governor, but directing her police gestapo to stop cars with New York license plates to demand “Your Papers, Please,” and telling them to quarantine for 14 days! Now, that’s anti-commerce if you ask me. I’m really getting fed up with all this crap, and I’m not sure how much more of this I can take, sort of like the guy on “Network” (but not that bad).

And also, speaking of fascist psychopaths, this thing with not letting churches or school choirs resume their rehearsals and concerts, because “singing lets out more droplets than just talking” and all that crap. Have you ever heard such nonsense? No, choruses and choirs and others singing are doing so because they get joy and pleasure from singing, and many people get joy and pleasure from hearing them sing. It’s another example of the BureaucRATs and rulers who can’t stand seeing people enjoying themselves and getting pleasure from the simplest activities like singing. BureaucRATs are real joyless psychopaths, in my view.