Skip to content

FDA Approves the Pfizer mRNA “Vaccine” That’s Not a Vaccine

The FDA has rushed through approval of the Pfizer Covid “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine, that doesn’t provide immunity and doesn’t prevent infections or transmissions, and isn’t intended to.

In December, here is how the Children’s Health Defense reported on the FDA meeting to grant Emergency Use Authorization of the Pfizer experimental drug injection:

The FDA’s handpicked acting committee chairman, University of Michigan professor of epidemiology Dr. Arnold Monto, 87, punctuated the dialogue with efforts to hurry it along.

“Okay, we have many, many questions and we’re going to have to limit them.”

“We need to keep it brief.”

“No follow up. We’re pressed for time. I got 10 people who want to ask questions.”

“I’m going to excuse Dr. Fink” — Doran Fink of the FDA — “from having to answer that part of the question.”

“Okay, we’re going to not worry about adaptive and innate immune responses right now. We’ll take that offline.”

“I think we want to stay away from more discussions about immune response and other things that could be taken offline.”

Committee member A. Oveta Fuller, an associate professor of microbiology and immunology at the University of Michigan, worried about potential side effects.

“So we have no idea what putting a messenger RNA lipid vaccine into people does long-term,” she said. “And we’re going from 20,000 people who get this vaccine to millions who get this vaccine with a very limited amount of risk assessment.”

But the rushed hearing seemed like it might have been “a dog and pony show for the public,” patient advocate Kim Witczak, the consumer representative on another FDA advisory committee, told the Project On Government Oversight (POGO).

Witczak said she was left shaking her head as questions were dismissed in disturbing fashion.

“I don’t think at the end of the day I had full trust in the process,” Witczak said.

It didn’t have to be that way, Peter Doshi, an associate professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, noted in an email to POGO.

“I do not feel one should be rushing a decision like this. If the meeting required additional discussion, the meeting should have been extended,” Doshi said.

Monto, tapped to fill in as chairman of the committee, had received tens of thousands of dollars from companies working on coronavirus vaccines. According to a federal database, in 2018, Pfizer paid him a $3,500 consulting fee.

My, isn’t that a shock!

Jon Rappoport writes about the FDA’s now full approval this week of the Pfizer “vaccine” that’s not a vaccine, with no hearing and all taking place behind closed doors.

An 8/20 article in the BMJ (“Covid-19: FDA set to grant full approval to Pfizer vaccine without public discussion of data”) [3] quotes a few of these dissenting mainstream pros. For example:

“Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data.”

“’These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,’ she said. ‘The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval’.”

“Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a [public FDA] meeting ‘we have no idea what the data looks like’.”

“’It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,’ she said. ‘There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed’.”

“’Full approval of covid-19 vaccines must be done in an open public forum for all to see. It could set a precedent of lowered standards for future vaccine approvals’.”

Understand—this devastating criticism of the FDA is coming from a person who operates WITHIN the public-health establishment.

Don’t believe anything that government bureaucrats tell you, they are thoroughly corrupt, and a bunch of liars. FDA/CDC/NIH/HHS bureaucrats in bed with pharmaceutical flunkies.

But many people naively trust their bureaucrats in control because the government stenographers of the “news” media repeat their propaganda over and over and over until the lies become “facts.” And people don’t want to believe that the rulers are corrupt and lying to them and using them as guinea pigs and walking all over them and so forth.

With all the thousands and thousands of deaths now, and other injuries and paralysis associated with these untested, experimental drug injections, anyone who has been pressured, coerced or mandated to receive the injection and this mRNA experiment, and has severe reactions should sue the employer, venue, mayor, or agency that has inflicted the harm through coercion and mandates.

The bureaucrats of the FDA need to be criminally charged with fraud and other crimes. Bureaucrats, mayors and governors, and their “news” media repeaters have been either intentionally or ignorantly making millions of people wrongly believe that these dangerous experimental drug injections are safe (and not deadly), and that they actually prevent infections and transmission of the virus, when they were not even intended to prevent those things.

Published inBureaucracyCivil LibertiesCorruptionFraudVaccines