I can’t believe I have to write about Willard again. No, not again! Willard Mitt Romney, that is.
Well, it appears that New Hampshire voters would prefer Romney over Donald Trump if Romney were in the race for the Republican nomination. Otherwise, The Donald is on top. Why? I think a lot of people now respond to emotional, feel-good rhetoric and nonsense. There is no thinking involved when it comes to supporting these politicians who are part fascist and part socialist. And I don’t mean to insult the people of New Hampshire. Many of them supported Ron Paul in 2012, because they support someone who promotes freedom and who opposes the socialist enslavement in which we all suffer. In that area, Ron Paul is the real deal. Donald Trump? Romney? Yech! No such luck.
But apparently the people of NH don’t care that Trump is someone who is anti-free trade, and who loves socialist eminent domain. And many registered Republicans and conservatives love the idea of a socialist government wall that Trump wants to build on the border, as though that will protect them from “illegal aliens.” But that sort of mentality is how anti-private property socialists and anti-self-defense slaves think. If you are worried about “criminals” coming through the border, what about all the American criminals already inside the border, raping, assaulting, killing, breaking in and burglarizing, robbing and so on. There are many more of them who are American citizens than there are those kinds of criminals who are “illegals.” So, mainly these politicians such as Trump are just pandering to anti-foreigner sentiments, which are now being even more reinforced by the situations in France and with “ISIS.”
But a lot of people in the “Live Free or Die” state would prefer Romney over Trump, even though Romney is just another socialist. I know, I know, people are just too influenced now with Newspeak, in which a socialist is called “capitalist” and so on. But the truth is the truth, and facts are facts, whether you like it or not. So with Romney being favored by New Hampshire voters now, here is another reminder of what “free market capitalists,” “conservatives” and Republicans are supporting when they support The Willard:
To begin, Romney the “capitalist” supported the taxpayer-funded Wall Street Bailout. And this “businessman” raised tax-thefts on businesses as governor of Massachusetts. Meanwhile, prior to being governor, Romney, the “capitalist” “businessman” himself benefited from government programs and taxpayer-funded wheeling-and-dealing.
And would Romney have reappointed Ben Bernanke as Chairman of the Fed, regardless of Bernanke’s destruction along with Bush, Paulson, et al.? You bet!
When it comes to medical freedom, Romney instead loves medical mandates. (No freedom with mandates.) You see, the socialist part of Massachusetts RomneyCare and ObamaCare is the IRS involvement of the involuntary collection and redistribution of tax dollars to fund these criminal schemes. But, besides the corporatist collusions between private businesses and government bureaucrats, a major fascist aspect of such schemes is the mandates. You vill do ziss, you vill do zat! Orders must be obeyed! So here is Romney with his syrupy, gross slobbering praise of fascist mandates:
And here is Romney at the signing of his 2006 Massachusetts health car mandate law, praising his buddy, Ted Kennedy (get me a bucket, as Mr. Creosote would say):
When it comes to supporting socialism, Romney is the guy. Gun control, of course, is a main part of socialist utopia, in which only government enforcers are armed, but the civilian population is unarmed and defenseless. Romney strongly supports a permanent assault weapons ban on the civilian population. The population’s disarmament has to have a beginning, after all.
Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts,” Romney said, at a bill signing ceremony on July 1 with legislators, sportsmen’s groups and gun safety advocates. “These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people.”
Like the federal assault weapons ban, the state ban, put in place in 1998, was scheduled to expire in September. The new law ensures these deadly weapons, including AK-47s, UZIs and Mac-10 rifles, are permanently prohibited in Massachusetts no matter what happens on the federal level.
The new law also makes a number of improvements to the current gun licensing system, including:
• Extending the term of a firearm identification card and a license to carry firearms from four years to six years;
• Granting a 90-day grace period for holders of firearm identification cards and licenses to carry who have applied for renewal; and
• Creating a seven-member Firearm License Review Board to review firearm license applications that have been denied.
As I have noted before, there is not much difference between socialism and fascism, and between socialists and fascists. The notorious 20th Century dictators were both socialist and fascist. (And so are the 21st Century ones, including the ones in Amerika.)
And boy, is Romney a fascist (as well as a socialist), supporting the government’s drug war. Despite the possibility that marijuana usage among the young people could be a contributor to why they are growing up to being such unthinking, incompetent sheeple, there is still the principled, moral case for drug freedom, as Laurence Vance pointed out. Nevertheless here is Willard being questioned by a medical patient who says he needs marijuana for treatment. He asks Romney if he would have him arrested for using marijuana (probably, just like Obama), and Romney becomes a snubber and walks away. Romney here is the typical sneering pol, quite frankly. Disgusting.
Regarding his “personal integrity,” I still haven’t heard any good explanation for why, on his departure in January 2007 as Massachusetts governor, his staff removed computer hard drives or otherwise removed whole State House office computers. What were they getting rid of and what were they hiding?
In response to the carbon caps or taxes question, a real truth-teller would say that this warming-climate change stuff is all phony and made-up and not backed by actual scientific empirical data, and shouldn’t be taken seriously. A true free-market capitalist would point to voluntary, free-market and private property solutions to air pollution, and that there shouldn’t be more taxes, certainly not higher taxes, for anyone. The main intention of the warmists and climate change activists is empowering the government to take even more private wealth and property from the workers and producers of society. And that’s it. Taking wealth, property, and freedom away from others is the main motivation of social activists, and it’s time someone told the truth about them.