Skip to content

Category: Propaganda

Mainstream News Media Do Not Seem to Support a Free Press

I am hoping that the more the new attorney general and the DOJ, and Senate Republicans, investigate the corrupt government parasites who attempted to falsely accuse Donald Trump of “collusions with Russians” and “meddling in the 2016 election,” the more the American people might then actually discover the truth about it. (But I am not holding my breath.)

Alas, many Americans believe myths and falsehoods about America and our elections, as well as other important matters, mainly based on false narratives that have been handed down through generations and promoted by what we know as the “mainstream media.”

For example, Americans believe they are living in a free country, but in reality they are not. Or, at least it isn’t as free as it once was in many ways. Jacob Hornberger has a recent post on America’s life of the lie.

For instance, the way I see it, many people believe that we have freedom of movement in America. But no, we don’t. Do you have the freedom to come and go as you please without having to report to a government bureaucrat or an armed goon at the border? Nope. You see, that would be freedom. But we live in a police state, and a police state is NOT freedom.

And real freedom would include the freedom to keep whatever you earn or honestly acquire, and do with it whatever you want, as Hornberger pointed out. And not have to report anything to the gubmint, your earnings, your charitable donations, your purchases, your property ownership, your business contracts or dealings, etc., because it’s none of the government’s damn business. If it’s none of the neighbor’s business then it’s none of the government’s business, I like to say.

Unfortunately, it seems that most Americans who believe they live in a free country suffer from “Stockholm Syndrome,” and they 100% support and defend their Rulers’ violations of their own rights, their freedom, their property, and their dignity.

But I also wanted to mention that we do not really have a “Free Press” in America. As Glenn Greenwald pointed out, most of the news media and punditry have still been hysterically going with the same “Trump-Russia collusions” since the Mueller Report has been released, even though Robert Mueller concluded that there is no evidence to support such a conspiracy theory, which is exactly what all that has been.

The hysteria is wide-spread, coming from news media people, some of whom actually know the truth but are mere propagandists for the Obama CIA, FBI and DOJ who criminally attempted to prevent a Trump presidency and to sabotage it now that Trump is President — but the hysteria is mostly coming from gullible, ignorant members of mainstream media who just don’t know any better.

But most Americans believe the false narrative and propaganda coming from the national security state and its news media flunkies, so, this case is another example of living the life of the lie, as Jacob Hornberger puts it.

I think that if we really lived in a genuinely free society that the government wouldn’t have the control that it has over the news media, the “Press.” The control that the national security state in Washington has over the mainstream (sic) media is perhaps more implicit and informal than if it were actually enshrined into law. Everything from the Washington Post and New York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox News, CNN and MSNBC, have their “unnamed sources,” “anonymous government sources,” “people familiar with the matter,” and so on, many sources of which are government bureaucrats who have an agenda, that of maintaining the status quo (their power grabs) or increasing and strengthening the powers of the State.

However, besides these mainstream media government flunkies, we now have alternative media, such as what we can get on the Internet, and many independent investigative journalists.

In the old days, we had only ABC, NBC, CBS, the New York Times and Washington Post, and our local TV/radio stations and newspapers, most of whom got their “news” from the gubmint. But there was not really much of an alternative.

The official narrative was what people believed. But now, while most people believe the official narrative, at least now more and more people are getting the truth that they weren’t getting from mainstream government news.

So without the Internet, in the old days people didn’t really have any alternative, so all they heard was official narrative. For example, I always thought that Richard Nixon did himself in by attempting to cover up the Watergate burglary. And that he was helped to be taken down by the “liberal media.” But the more I learned, I see that it was probably the national security state that was behind the whole thing. The actual Watergate burglars and co-conspirators included CIA guy E. Howard Hunt, after all. (Why would a professional CIA spook get involved with some low-level election campaign operation?) And Bob Woodward was allegedly a CIA asset, who was allegedly participating in taking down Nixon allegedly on behalf of the national security state.

And why would the national security state want to take down Nixon? Well, it certainly wasn’t because he was a warmonger and “We’re all Keynesians now,” because the statists love that stuff.

Nixon began his détente meetings with China in February 1972 and with the Soviets in May that year. At the end of the day, the national security state does not want to thaw the Cold War, as we have seen in its apparatchiks going after Donald Trump, who has clearly not been loyal to their Cold War 2.0 agenda.

You see, the national security state thrives on wars, cold and hot, and on terrorism and fears of terrorism, to justify its existence. John F. Kennedy was attempting to thaw the Cold War already in the early 1960s, and look what happened.

So the national security parasites had to take down Nixon to do with their loyalty to their cult and the power trips their beloved State gives them.

Now, why do most Americans believe the official narratives imposed by government? Because the official narratives (such as “lone nut shooter” or “Trump-Russia collusions”) are continuously carried forward by the mainstream news media.

And why is this? Because many graduates from America’s journalism schools are products of government schools, and so they don’t know any better. Just like most Americans, they too were raised to recite the Pledge of Obedience to the flag, to sing the National Anthem, to believe in America’s religion of “American Exceptionalism.”

And worse than today’s graduates of America’s journalism schools are the political operatives and campaign strategists who then became news anchors, news program hosts, reporters, and so on. I could name them here, but you probably know who many of them are. How could you not know who many of them are, when many of today’s news anchors, news program hosts, and reporters started out as political operatives and campaign strategists, or worse, government bureaucrats. It’s a sick revolving door.

So, many Americans who depend on the mainstream news outlets for “information” think they live in a free society, but they are getting propaganda and believing it, hook, line and sinker, and thus accepting one intrusion after another into their private lives or restrictions on their liberty, in the name of “national security.”

Some of My Past Writing on WikiLeaks, Assange and Manning

I had written quite a bit about WikiLeaks and the Bradley/Chelsea Manning leaks a while back. And there are many 2010-2014 news and opinion articles online that talk about “Bradley” Manning, not “Chelsea.” (There may very well be some people who have been trying to research this case and might be missing articles from that period because they might be searching “Chelsea Manning.” I just thought I’d mention that.)

These past posts and articles of mine give some good information (if you don’t mind my saying so), for those who might not have been that familiar with this whole affair. They especially address the Press abandoning the important role of exposing the corruption and crimes of TPTB, and the problem some people have in their believing the lies of the government against whistleblowers, and believing the gubmint’s propaganda.

In this October 24, 2010 post, I wrote:

Glenn Greenwald writes on today’s “Nixonian henchmen”: The New York Times and CNN as the “Establishment Media,” smearing WikiLeaker Julian Assange in the same way that President Nixon’s “Plumbers” smeared Daniel Ellsberg as punishment for his leaking the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times. While in 1971, officials of the government broke into a journalist’s psychiatrist’s office to get private information with which to do the smearing, now it is a journalist’s fellow journalists doing the smearing on behalf of protecting the government from public disclosure over its own criminality, deceit and war crimes associated with the Iraq War.

This is further confirmation that the jounalists of today are shills for the illicit State, and not the finders and tellers of news and truth that they’re supposed to be.

And this is CNN and the New York Times, mind you, so-called “liberal” media. Whatever happened to the anti-Iraq War crowd in the media from 2004 and those Dan Rather types? Do these “liberal” news media elites who hated Bush for Iraq now love Iraq for Obama?

Meanwhile, NYT and CNN aside, Fox News seems to be covering Assange with at least some balance and fairness, and at least some lack of smearing. (By the way, CNN ranks far behind in the cable wars, and the New York Times is just about ready to go out of business.)

If U.S. government officials from the president and generals on down to soldiers and contractors committed war crimes, let the truth be told. Don’t shoot the messenger — jail the criminals.

In the first part of this December 4, 2010 post, I wrote:

The coincidences between U.S. happenings and goings on in Israel never end. This situation with WikiLeaks and its latest release that exposes nincompoops like Hillary Clinton, and with neocon nudniks like Sarah Palin asserting that Julian Assange has “blood on his hands,” is very similar to the situation in Israel. A young female Israeli military clerk named Anat Kamm burned classified military information to CD as well as made copies of material in print and released that material to a Haaretz newspaper reporter, Uri Blau, who used the material to report on the military’s alleged crimes. In the words of Ms. Kamm,

“There were some aspects of the IDF’s operational procedures in the West Bank that I felt should be public knowledge…

“…When I was burning the CDs I kept thinking that history tends to forgive people who expose war crimes…”

Kamm is not charged with espionage on behalf of another government, but she is charged with compromising Israel’s security. It’s very similar to the current situation with WikiLeaks. The Israeli media by and large is the propaganda organ for the government and military, just as our Fourth Estate here in the U.S. has become with the U.S. government. Thomas Jefferson is throwing up in his grave right now over this.

The Haaretz reporter Uri Blau had been in hiding in London, but had recently come forward for interrogation, but I don’t know whether or not he’s been charged.

But as British journalist Jonathan Cook put it,

“During her conscription, Kamm copied possibly hundreds of army documents that revealed systematic law-breaking by the Israeli high command operating in the occupied Palestinian territories, including orders to ignore court rulings. She was working at the time in the office of Brig. Gen. Yair Naveh, who is in charge of operations in the West Bank.

“Blau’s crime is that he published a series of scoops based on her leaked information that have highly embarrassed senior Israeli officers by showing their contempt for the rule of law.”

In other words, the two are really accused of embarrassing government officials, and exposing their transgressions, just as Julian Assange and Bradley Manning are accused of with U.S. officials. But while this was initially going on several months ago, you just wouldn’t believe the hatred and venom toward those two Israelis in comments sections of various Israeli newspaper articles and opinion columns.

The worse of it, in my opinion, has come from Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick, who also has some things to write this week about WikiLeaks.

“Make no mistake about it, the ongoing WikiLeaks operation against the US is an act of war.”

Only a fool could actually think that Julian Assange’s releasing information that the American people have a right to know about what their government has been doing on their behalf could be an “act of war.” A fool, or someone who is so absorbed in the power of the State, so mindlessly mystical of the State and its military that any act by someone that is in the slightest way challenging of the State’s authority and integrity (which is not difficult — what integrity?) is to the State and its apparatchiks an “act of war.”

Glick also refers in that column to Kamm and Blau that Glick feels should be investigated for “treason,” yet it is our treasonous governments whose decades-long campaigns of aggression provoke people in other countries and have gravely backfired against us Americans, as well as against Israelis

In this December 28, 2010 article on the treasonous U.S. government, I wrote:

Some critics of the WikiLeaks release have referred to Manning’s alleged actions as “treasonous,” and compromising American security. But in actuality, the leaked documents have done nothing but expose the crimes of the State, which is what the Press used to do before that institution apparently merged itself into the State apparatus. The real “treason” that is happening is that of the agents of the State acting against Americans’ liberty and prosperity.

While the recent document leaker has not compromised America’s security in any way whatsoever, we can take a closer look at how the U.S. government’s agents just over the past 20 years have been the real culprits in compromising the security of Americans. That includes President George H.W. Bush’s taking the U.S. into war against Iraq in 1990-91, the U.S. government’s and United Nations’ sanctions against Iraq throughout the 1990s and how those hostilities against Iraqis have backfired against the U.S., and George W. Bush’s “War on Terror” campaigns in Afghanistan and Iraq and against Americans’ civil liberties.

And, last but not least, in this September 4, 2013 article, I wrote (among other things):

In more recent years, there have been the NSA and IRS scandals, constant FBI and other federal S.W.A.T. raids on the wrong house, the FBI thwarting terrorist plots that the FBI themselves cook up, FBI entrapments, and so on.

My, how the Fulbright Hearings, the Watergate Hearings, the Church Committee, the Tower Commission and other similar efforts at reform certainly have succeeded!

Let’s have more reform!

And now Army PFC Bradley Manning, a.k.a. Chelsea Manning – who was given a kangaroo trial administered by an extremely biased judge – has been railroaded into a 35-year sentence on top of time already served in a tortured solitary confinement.

But Manning didn’t “betray his country” or commit actual espionage on behalf of any foreign enemy. Military and security experts had testified that none of the information Manning gave to WikiLeaks had posed any danger to any American or U.S. soldier overseas.

Another military whistleblower, retired USAF Lt. Col. Karen Kwiatkowski has pointed out that there have been actual spies, Robert Hanssen, Aldrich Ames, James Hall, and George Trofimoff, who actually did sell secrets to foreign regimes such as Russia but who had been treated much more humanely by the U.S. government than Manning was treated.

You see, Manning felt it was important to inform the American people of the war crimes and diplomatic buffoonery committed by our own government.

Manning’s “crime” was of having a moral conscience, and of embarrassing and angering our corrupt and criminal Rulers who didn’t like their criminality and incompetence exposed for all the world to see.

That is part of the cult of self-serving State authority that we have now.

It is amazing how the campaign to mislead and propagandize – led by U.S. government officials and repeated by their Press stenographers – has turned actual government whistleblowers into “bad guys” in the eyes of many misinformed and gullible people, from the very beginning of the WikiLeaks documents releases and the Manning witch hunt.

At the very beginning of the Manning witch hunt, in June 2010, Glenn Greenwald wrote about the FBI informant who had turned Manning in to the government, Adrian Lamo, and on Lamo’s relationship with Wired senior editor Kevin Poulsen. At that time, Wired had published only a partial version of the chat logs between Manning and Lamo.

Greenwald wrote a subsequent update to that, in which it turned out there had been quite some relationship between Wired’s Poulsen and informant Lamo, that Lamo had been the government’s one and only source against Manning, and Greenwald noted the “journalistic disgrace” in Wired’s withholding of key information from other news reporters on the Manning case.

And Greenwald wrote a further update after Wired had published the full Manning-Lamo chat logs.

We must ask: Were Poulsen and Wired withholding information from other journalists to help the government project a false narrative of why Bradley Manning released documents to WikiLeaks? You can read those articles and make your own conclusions.

Believe Propaganda or Know the Truth about Julian Assange

Glenn Greenwald: the U.S. government’s indictment of Julian Assange poses grave threats to Press freedom.

Jonathan Cook on 7 years of lies about Assange that won’t stop now.

James Bovard says the Assange arrest is a deadly threat to a free press.

Thomas Knapp says that pardoning Julian Assange would be the first step toward the rule of law. (I’m not holding my breath.)

And Kelley Vlahos says we should fear the arrest of Julian Assange.

Measles Hysteria and Vaccine Totalitarians

Karen De Coster writes about the measles hysteria and anti-science totalitarians:

The non-scientific purveyors of vaccination nation propaganda swear by “the science” (that they don’t even read, or understand) as overall proof that all vaccinations are always beneficial to the herd, and that individuals – according to “the science” – cannot be potentially harmed. And that’s because the official narrative says so. In fact, most of the opinions expressed by the non-medical, pro-vaxx, armchair scientists on social media are overwhelmingly in favor of forced vaccinations and/or the purging of non-vaccinated individuals from public places and forums. This, they say, is justice for the rest of the herd. They scream their vaccination decrees and they shout down skepticism. Then they shame those who don’t partake, and they demand conformity. The herd carries a tremendous amount of hatred and bigotry for anyone who dares to dissent from their mob-think…

And she refers to an episode of the Brady Bunch in which most of the family had the measles. You see, in the “old days,” people were not hysterical about getting the measles, or the chicken pox, or the flu. It was not the end of the world. But in today’s fear-mongering and risk-averse society, ignoramuses act on their hysteria and would prefer to have the government police force vaccinations or drugs on others if it gave the totalitarian ones a false sense of safety (even though many of these same people eat junk foods and processed foods and make themselves obese and give themselves diabetes, take drugs or smoke or drink that gives them cancer or liver disease or dementia, and poison themselves and make themselves sicker with prescription drugs!).

Karen De Coster then posts a video of some of that episode of the Brady Bunch in which the family is NOT hysterical. (Go figure.)

More Articles of Interest

Jacob Hornberger on drug laws versus freedom, and the deadly and destructive futility of the drug war.

Donald Boudreaux’s conversation with a young socialist.

Laurence Vance says that military personnel make a senseless sacrifice.

Jeffrey Tucker says that people want the State to be in charge of private economic and social activity, but they are unwilling to say it.

And Peter van Buren on how Rachel Maddow turned into Infowars.

Good Detailed Summary of What Led Up to “Trump-Russia Collusions” Conspiracy Theory

Former State Department employee Peter van Buren has an article in which he details the “primordial ooze of the collusion conspiracy,” that begins with the Clinton campaign and the DNC in mid-2016, their using Fusion GPS and British spy Christopher Steele to dig deep and get oppo dirt on Trump as well as make stuff up (the “Steele dossier”), and how Steele got the made-up information to the FBI and DOJ who used it as a basis for fraudulent, unlawful FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign and to start a propaganda campaign promoting the conspiracy theory of “Trump-Russia collusions” that never happened.

Additionally, Justin Raimondo on his twitter linked to his article of January, 2017, “The Foreign Plot to Oust Trump” stretching from London to Langley.

Some Articles Exposing Today’s Brainwashed Doctors

Elaine has an article on how powerless she was to stop doctors from harming her transgender-identifying daughter. Doctors are brainwashed to immediately treat a transgender-identifying child as the opposite sex according to the child’s wishes, even as young as 5. They encourage the parents to be irrational and call their son their “daughter.” And many states now have laws saying you must do this. Many people are brainwashed, that’s for sure. Doctors certainly are.

And Richard Enos asks, Are Western doctors compelled to support the vaccine industry? Many doctors are as brainwashed as the general population to assume that the vaccines are overwhelmingly safe and effective. “This is notwithstanding the publicly available fact that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid approximately $4 billion to families with vaccine injured children, and that only accounts for 1 percent of vaccine injured children.” He provides an example of a mother talking to a clueless, brainwashed doctor about the autopsy tests he wouldn’t perform on her child who died soon after getting 6 vaccines.

Time for the Authoritarians to Censor Those Who Oppose Mandatory Vaccines

First, Bretigne Shaffer explains the anti-liberty aspect of vaccine mandates, and says that no one has a right to demand that others are vaccinated.

There has, historically, been a widely held and asserted expectation of quarantine in the case of exceptionally dangerous illnesses. However, this is not at all what the proponents of mandated vaccines are calling for. Quarantine is simply the demand that those who are already infected with a disease remain isolated in their homes or elsewhere until they are no longer able to infect others.

This is profoundly different from what the pro-mandate crowd demands: that those who are not infected undergo a medical procedure to minimize their chances of becoming infected. This is a much more intrusive demand and a potentially dangerous one.

Of course, if disease transmission is really what the proponents of vaccine mandates are worried about, then they should also demand that those recently vaccinated with live-virus vaccines not be allowed in schools or any public spaces. And if they aren’t demanding this, then one has to wonder whether the transmission of disease really is their primary concern.

The bottom line, though, has nothing to do with the science behind vaccines, nor with herd immunity, nor competing claims about vaccine safety and vaccine harm. Nor does it have to do with how serious diseases like measles are or are not. It is simply this: You do not have the right to force a medical procedure on another person.

And now it’s not enough that the vaccine fascists want to force everyone to have vaccines whether they want them or not. They are now trying to silence the other side.

The pro-forced vacciners are getting social media outlets to censor the anti-vaccine side’s side of the argument. If you really believe you have “science” and facts on your side, then you shouldn’t fear hearing the other side and shouldn’t fear a debate. Right?

Aaron and Melissa Dykes have this video on how the vaccine authoritarians are trying to not only censor the debate, but are labeling the anti-forced vaccine people as “haters” and a “hate group.”

The Mandatory Vaccine Police-State Terrorists

Dagny Taggart of the “Organic Prepper” details the way of life in the new Amerika, the mandatory vaccine police state, in which government police and S.W.A.T. team goons break into a family’s home and kidnap their 3 kids, because one of them had had a fever and had not been vaccinated. The article is not clear about what the kids are not vaccinated against.

The mother apparently told the doctor on the phone that the child’s fever had already gone down and was already feeling better, and so she would not be taking him to the emergency room as the doctor ordered. And also, the mother had expressed concern that the doctor might report her to Department of Child Safety (DCS) for not having her kids vaccinated.

Now, the important information the doctor was given on the phone at that time was that the fever had gone down to normal, and the child was feeling better and was playing, and so on. So (and I’m not a doctor, I know), what a doctor with common sense at that point would do is to say, okay, I’m glad the kid is feeling better and the fever has gone away so he’s better and there’s no need for the child to be taken to the emergency room.

But, noooooo. Not in today’s Amerika. Today’s police state. The doctor called the police and the DCS on the family. The goons kidnapped the kids and put the family through hell.

We’re going to have a lot more of this kind of medical police state, especially with “Medicare for All,” i.e. Soviet medical care, when doctors are all government employees.

The younger doctors now are getting even dumber and less rational, which reflects on the younger generation in general, because the schools are making it easier and easier to get higher grades regardless of the students’ actually learning anything of value. What they are learning is that every little thing is “racist” or “sexist,” white males have “privilege” (even if they’re poor or discriminated against because of affirmative action), and that people have a right to free education, free health care and free iPhones.

And the vaccine stuff. I recently wrote about Gov. Matt Bevin who isn’t vaccinating his kids and wants them to have typical childhood illnesses so they can develop immunity naturally, which is the best way to develop immunity. But in “modern society” today, millions of people literally worship vaccines like a god.

Just recently Brian Shilhavy of Health Impact News wrote about a Philadelphia mumps outbreak among already vaccinated people. The article also notes that the maker of the vaccine, the evil Merck, is being sued by former Merck employees who are acting as whistleblowers regarding the employees having “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the (MMR) vaccine’s efficacy findings.”

Merck and other pharmaceutical companies have been sued by people because of injuries caused by the vaccines. I have already written about Merck’s killer HPV vaccine, Gardasil.

And as I wrote in my post on Gov. Matt Bevin, Sharyl Attkisson wrote about what the news isn’t saying about vaccine-autism studies, and has this page of links to many articles on the subject of vaccines. Please check out those articles, and then tell me about something being “debunked,” or that the “science is settled.” (The closed-minded among us will continue to say, “debunked.”)

And why are little kids being given so many vaccines now? The medical establishment is poisoning and damaging the kids and adults’ brains, all in the name of profits for Merck, Pfizer and Glaxo-etc-etc. But it’s worse for the kids at such a young age when their brains are still in very important early development stages.

And, as I had also mentioned in various posts, Dr. Julian Whitaker wrote that “Depending upon which vaccine is being administered, a single shot can contain a brew of adulterated bacteria, viruses, aluminum, mercury, formaldehyde, hydrochloric acid, and/or numerous multisyllabic chemical additives. To say that repeated exposures to such a wide range of toxins have no cumulative adverse effects on a child’s developing nervous and immune systems is more than irrational—it’s diabolical.” Dr. Whitaker also points out that kids receive 14 different vaccines in 49 doses by the age of six.

Bill Sardi states that “children under age 2 are not able to develop sufficient antibodies to develop immunity from vaccination.  Despite this basic fact, the medical establishment insists upon administering a total of 19 shots, containing 24 vaccines, to infants on their 2, 4 and 6 month pediatric visits.” Sardi gives a lot of important information with links for further inquiry.

We now live in a societal regression. Even hundreds of members of Congress have signed on to getting rid of cars and trucks, planes, and probably all of industry, because what they really want is to bring us all back to the Dark Ages, in the name of saving the environment.

So, also in today’s societal regression, in which myths, medical corruption and ignorance rule, we will now have a medical police state with doctor-S.W.A.T. team terrorists going after dissenters to force people to poison their kids’ brains, all in the name of protecting them.

The Delusional Never-Trump Media

Now, I am not a Trump supporter, but I calls it like I sees it. This whole propaganda campaign was obvious to me since the Washington Post’s November of 2016 propaganda article on “Fake News,” to try to cover themselves while they promulgated the real fake news.

Former U.S. State Department veteran Peter van Buren writes about how the entire Mueller investigation was a lie from the very beginning, and about the media’s and national security expert analysts’ propaganda throughout the fishing expedition. He summarizes the various indictments that did occur but having nothing to do with the actual allegations of “Trump campaign collusions with Russia.”

Among other things, van Buren writes:

Another generation of journalists soiled themselves. They elevated mongerers like Seth Abramson, Malcolm Nance, and Lawrence Tribe, who vomited nonsense all over Twitter every afternoon before appearing before millions on CNN. They institutionalized unsourced gossip as their ledes—how often were we told that the walls were closing in? That it was Mueller time? How often was the public put on red alert that Trump/Sessions/Rosenstein/Whitaker/Barr was going to fire the special prosecutor? The mass media featured only stories that furthered the collusion tall tale and silenced those skeptical of the prevailing narrative, the same way they failed before the Iraq war.

The short version: there were no WMDs in Iraq. That was a lie and the media promoted it shamelessly while silencing skeptical voices. Now Mueller has indicted zero Americans for working with Russia to influence the election. Russiagate was a lie and the media promoted it shamelessly while silencing skeptical voices.

The same goes for the politicians, alongside Hayden, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey, who told Americans that the president they elected was a spy working against the United States. None of that was accidental. It was a narrative they desperately wanted to be true so they could profit politically regardless of what it did to the nation. And today the whitewashing is already ongoing (watch out for tweets containing the word “regardless”).

The New York Post lists the top media “news” people who got it most wrong the whole time, including Rachel Maddow and Joe Scarborough on cable, Bill Kristol and Max Boot in the print media, Benjamin Wittes and Lawrence Tribe in the twitterverse, and Alec Baldwin and Joy Behar on Network TV.

And here is Glenn Greenwald appearing on Fox with Tucker Carlson. Greenwald scolds the media’s government flunkies CNN and MSNBC for not only being propagandists for the national security establishment’s narrative, but for intentionally banning actual investigative journalists from appearing on their networks.

The “Mueller Report”: The Coup Failed. But Will the Real Conspirators See the Hoosegow?

So yesterday I’m listening to these Sunday news shows Meet the Depressed, Fake the Nation and Faux News Sunday, rebroadcast on Bloomberg Radio, and today these local liberal talk radio personalities, and it’s like they’re all living in a different world of non-reality. They are in a world far removed from the truth, especially when it comes to the long-anticipated “Mueller Report,” and attorney general William Barr’s spin on it to Congress.

The media groupies are still clinging to the notion that Trump “obstructed justice” and they’re still talking impeachment, when in reality it was the high-up FBI and DOJ flunkies who “obstructed justice” in their falsely exonerating Hillary Clinton in her rogue email mishandlings, by changing the words “gross negligence” to “extremely careless,” in order to falsely get out of criminally indicting Clinton.

And will the impeachment-obsessed Jerrold Nadler and Adam Schiffty look into the “insurance policy” that the high-ups at DOJ and FBI implemented to try to ward off a Trump presidency or to sabotage it if it were to occur? The usage of the Steele dossier that British spy Christopher Steel wrote up on Trump that was filled with made-up allegations with no verification whatsoever?

In fact, Bruce Ohr at the DOJ told senior FBI and DOJ bureaucrats, and obviously the signers of the FISA warrant applications that were used to illicitly spy on Trump campaign people, that the information used for those FISA applications, the “Steele dossier,” was unverified, and the officials then misled FISA court judges who signed the warrants. So, if there are to be indictments for “obstruction of justice” and “conspiracy,” they need to be handed to James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Sally Yates and Rod Rosenstein, the officials who submitted FISA warrant applications with unverified information to the FISA judges. I wrote about all that in this article in January.

I have a feeling that, thanks to the propagandists of the mainstream media, most people have never even heard of Bruce Ohr.

So will the Obama-Comey FBI/DOJ spy ring get indicted? That also includes the former director of national intelligence (sic) James Clapper and CIA director John Brennan. Kimberly Strassel of the Wall Street Journal called Brennan the “ringmaster” and Giuliani referred to him as the “quarterback.”

Can you imagine if the Bush DOJ and FBI spied on the Obama campaign and attempted to falsely accuse Obama of “collusions with Russia to sway the 2008 election”?

And all those indictments handed down by the Mueller fishing expedition? Nothing to do with “Russia collusions” to change the 2016 election.

The first group of Russians who were indicted were using social media because they were trying to make money. It was a money-making click-bait scheme.

But the second group of Russians from the Russian intelligence GRU, were indicted to do with non-existent “hacking” of the DNC and the Clinton campaign computers, but the indictments were not substantiated with any evidence whatsoever, as we heard from Moon of Alabama and Joe Lauria. The Mueller people just made it all up.

And Paul Manafort’s dealings were with Ukrainians, not Russians, and having nothing to do with the 2016 election, and his tax-related indictments were from years ago, well before the 2016 election! Then there was Mike Flynn’s “guilty” plea for lying to investigators, after having been entrapped by FBI, even though FBI’s top agent Strzok believed that Flynn was not lying.

The whole thing has been a fishing expedition and an attempted frame-up of Trump. And I’m not even a Trump supporter.

The reasons these “national security” apparatchiks went after Trump — joined enthusiastically by the toadies of the media and the rest of the government losers in Washington — wasn’t just because he criticized the national security establishment and their terrible wars.

It was also because he’s a successful entrepreneur. Government losers HATE successful entrepreneurs. So it’s also a part of their ENVY that we are seeing more and more of from government worshipers now. That is part of why government “law enforcement” went after Martha Stewart — and Michael Milken, Aaron Swarz, Joseph Nacchio and John Kinnucan, and others.

And now government “law enforcement” is going after Robert Kraft. The goons can easily go after ANY famous celebrity male patronizing a house of prostitution. So why Robert Kraft, and only weeks after his Patriots won their 6th Super Bowl? I have answered my own question. Duh. There’s that envy again. And that’s why. (And maybe because Kraft is a Trump supporter? Ya think?)

It’s the inherent nature of the government parasite who would never make it in the private sector, or anywhere were it not for the forced redistribution of wealth scheme that’s been financed by the thievery of the income tax for the past century.

And the FBI has been going after The Donald since at least 2003, as we know from Felix Sater. The anti-business FBI has probably been wanting to get Trump since the 1980s, quite frankly.