Skip to content

Category: Censorship

Time to Catch Up

Ron Paul says that (government) spending is theft.

Former NSA analyst Bill Binney says that the NSA has 32 pages of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, as revealed by a FOIA request.

Ryan McMaken says that yes, Julian Assange is a journalist — but that shouldn’t matter.

Mark Perry on Donald Trump’s washing machine tariffs costing consumers $800,000 per job created.

Robert Wenzel on the new way that socialists are going to hide who they are.

Jacob Hornberger on how Gitmo destroyed our constitutional order.

Lew Rockwell on the college admissions scandal and the political prisoners of the evil FBI.

Zero Hedge with an article on a study showing that electric cars cause more Co2 emissions than previously thought. As the article also notes: “Add to this the CO2 emissions of the electricity from powerplants that power such vehicles, and the actual Tesla emissions could be between 156 to 180 grams of CO2 per kilometer (249 and 289 grams of CO2 per mile).”

James Bovard says that hysteria over school safety won’t keep us safe.

And Hans Bader says that lifting the ban on kidney sales would save 30,000 American lives annually.

Corrupt Bureaucrats Getting Assange and WikiLeaks for Their Exposure of “Vault 7”?

Moon of Alabama notes that perhaps the main reason that U.S. government and other corrupt governments are going after Julian Assange is to do with the CIA’s Vault 7, the program that enables the CIA to put Russian “fingerprints” on a computer hack in order to blame the Russians (or others) on their hack.

As former CIA analyst Ray McGovern wrote in June of 2017,

The capabilities shown in what WikiLeaks calls the “Vault 7” trove of CIA documents required the creation of hundreds of millions of lines of source code. At $25 per line of code, that amounts to about $2.5 billion for each 100 million code lines. But the Deep State has that kind of money and would probably consider the expenditure a good return on investment for “proving” the Russians hacked into Democratic Party emails.

In other words, it is altogether possible that the hacking attributed to Russia was actually one of several “active measures” undertaken by a cabal consisting of the CIA, FBI, NSA and Clapper…

Supposedly it was the Vault 7 program that WikiLeaks leaked that especially infuriated the criminals of the CIA. Zero Hedge has more information on Vault 7. If the CIA can hack computers and leave the “fingerprints” of Russians then they can do it to anyone, including Americans, political candidates, businessmen, social activists, etc.

Moon of Alabama also referred to how Assange was negotiating with the U.S. government regarding WikiLeaks’ acquiring of the Vault 7 information, but then-FBI director James Comey stopped the negotiations. Apparently the FBI has an agenda just as the CIA does.

And, as Matt Agorist asks, if Donald Trump is so worried about “fake news,” then why is he prosecuting WikiLeaks, who have been 100% right?

And I say it’s because Trump is an authoritarian statist and obediently worships and obeys the national security state, and anything that questions, challenges or exposes the national security state for the corrupt, tyrannical criminal racket that it is, has got to be stomped on. That’s why. When it comes to “drain the swamp,” Donald Trump is full of it. He’s just another demagogue and knows how to play the “Deplorables” like a fiddle.

“Liberal” (i.e. “Fascist”) Massachusetts Bans “Conversion Therapy” for Transgenders and Gays

In Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Half-Baker lives up to his name, “Half-Baker,” and has signed the anti-“conversion therapy” bill into law. He follows in the footsteps of the governor of New Hampshire, the “Live Free or Die” state, Gov. Chris Sununu, who signed a similar bill just weeks before his reelection last Fall.

As I wrote in this post, “Conversion therapy isn’t just the ‘electric shock therapy’ that the fear mongering propagandists have been screaming about. Conversion therapy can include someone who is insecure with his or her sexual orientation or gender identity, such as having difficulty identifying with one’s gender that one was born with, and going to a clinical psychotherapist to talk about the issue to try to deal with it better…”

And, “yes, it is a charade with this transgender crap. Someone who is a male but believes he is a female obviously has some psychological issues going on. Maybe he’s been brainwashed by wacko parents or by demented ideologically-guided teachers at school, or there is some high level of dysfunction in the home that is affecting his personality development or his self-identity and gender identity. Whatever the situation, someone who is a male but thinks he’s a female (but clearly isn’t a female because he’s a male) or someone who is a female but thinks she’s a male (but clearly isn’t a male because she’s a female) and who wants to have a normal gender identity that’s based on what actual biological gender the person actually is, has a right to seek guidance in that regard…”

Sorry for my copying and pasting from an earlier post. I wish I had more time.

The whole law is as anti-freedom of speech, thought and conscience as you can get, and I hope someone takes this up to the U.S. Supreme Court (although most of the time, those 9 bureaucrats are totally useless, I know). This whole thing is about free speech, not “gay or transgender civil rights.” It is about compelled speech, banned speech, censorship, and silencing innocent people in the name of promoting unhealthy lifestyles.

And the cognitive dissonance and irrationality of the social activists is getting worse now. The gender and gay activists want to ban such “conversion” treatments by law, but they endorse “doctors” slicing and dicing and cutting off the sex organs of perfectly healthy people including minors, and without their parents’ approval, by the way. Many of these same deranged activist psychos also want to legalize murdering unborn babies up to the point of birth and even after the baby is born.

And another thing: “conversion”? Who is “converting,” and converting to what? This is about young people who have confusion and want to be what they are. It’s the activists who are trying to “convert” someone over to the opposite sex despite one’s actual biological sex.

So, the new law in Massachusetts clearly addresses “licensed” therapists and other practitioners and states that they could be subject to disciplinary action by the licensing boards if they try to help a confused young person deal with his or her gender issues or sexual attraction issues that the person wants to get help in dealing with.

The conclusion: If you are someone who is dealing with the above issues and who wants to be treated with therapy to help you deal with those issues, don’t go to a licensed therapist or practitioner. This whole thing is yet another example of the validity of requiring practitioners to be licensed by the gubmint, especially when many people in that bureaucracy are crackpots.

Finally, Laurence Vance has an article on a related issue, that of a Catholic lady refusing to rent a room at her B&B to a lesbian couple, which is her right to do in a free society. The couple took her to court. Now, there are plenty of places to rent a room. Couldn’t the couple just find another place? It’s just like the activists taking those wedding florists, bakers and photographers to court. You can very well find someone else to bake your damn cake, so why harass the ones who don’t want to do business with you? (Because Amerika is now an extremely narcissistic society, in which people claim to have some kind of a right to other people’s property, and a right to force other people to serve them, involuntarily, that’s why.)

As Laurence Vance says, in an authoritarian society such as ours, your property is not your own, it’s the government’s.

And if you have a psychotherapy practice, it is also not your own, it’s the government’s. The activists on behalf of sexual perversion, dysfunction and deviancy now know how to use the coercive powers of government to impose their ways of life onto others. Sad.

Time for the Authoritarians to Censor Those Who Oppose Mandatory Vaccines

First, Bretigne Shaffer explains the anti-liberty aspect of vaccine mandates, and says that no one has a right to demand that others are vaccinated.

There has, historically, been a widely held and asserted expectation of quarantine in the case of exceptionally dangerous illnesses. However, this is not at all what the proponents of mandated vaccines are calling for. Quarantine is simply the demand that those who are already infected with a disease remain isolated in their homes or elsewhere until they are no longer able to infect others.

This is profoundly different from what the pro-mandate crowd demands: that those who are not infected undergo a medical procedure to minimize their chances of becoming infected. This is a much more intrusive demand and a potentially dangerous one.

Of course, if disease transmission is really what the proponents of vaccine mandates are worried about, then they should also demand that those recently vaccinated with live-virus vaccines not be allowed in schools or any public spaces. And if they aren’t demanding this, then one has to wonder whether the transmission of disease really is their primary concern.

The bottom line, though, has nothing to do with the science behind vaccines, nor with herd immunity, nor competing claims about vaccine safety and vaccine harm. Nor does it have to do with how serious diseases like measles are or are not. It is simply this: You do not have the right to force a medical procedure on another person.

And now it’s not enough that the vaccine fascists want to force everyone to have vaccines whether they want them or not. They are now trying to silence the other side.

The pro-forced vacciners are getting social media outlets to censor the anti-vaccine side’s side of the argument. If you really believe you have “science” and facts on your side, then you shouldn’t fear hearing the other side and shouldn’t fear a debate. Right?

Aaron and Melissa Dykes have this video on how the vaccine authoritarians are trying to not only censor the debate, but are labeling the anti-forced vaccine people as “haters” and a “hate group.”

More Articles

John Whitehead with an article on how we’re all lab rats in the government’s secret experiments. Get ready to be grossed out if you aren’t already familiar with some of the sick experiments the degenerate psychopaths in Washington have performed on the people.

Laurence Vance has a lengthy article on your tax dollars at work. Very detailed. And he distinguishes between the typical liberal/conservative statist view on taxes and the libertarian view. Is there somewhere in this piece in which he suggests to get rid of the federal government as a good solution? I didn’t see it. (In fact, that same solution applies to the first link above as well.)

Michael Rozeff says that socialism suppresses entrepreneurship.

And Joseph Mercola on Internet watchdogs and fake fact-checkers, conflicts of interest.

The Delusional Never-Trump Media

Now, I am not a Trump supporter, but I calls it like I sees it. This whole propaganda campaign was obvious to me since the Washington Post’s November of 2016 propaganda article on “Fake News,” to try to cover themselves while they promulgated the real fake news.

Former U.S. State Department veteran Peter van Buren writes about how the entire Mueller investigation was a lie from the very beginning, and about the media’s and national security expert analysts’ propaganda throughout the fishing expedition. He summarizes the various indictments that did occur but having nothing to do with the actual allegations of “Trump campaign collusions with Russia.”

Among other things, van Buren writes:

Another generation of journalists soiled themselves. They elevated mongerers like Seth Abramson, Malcolm Nance, and Lawrence Tribe, who vomited nonsense all over Twitter every afternoon before appearing before millions on CNN. They institutionalized unsourced gossip as their ledes—how often were we told that the walls were closing in? That it was Mueller time? How often was the public put on red alert that Trump/Sessions/Rosenstein/Whitaker/Barr was going to fire the special prosecutor? The mass media featured only stories that furthered the collusion tall tale and silenced those skeptical of the prevailing narrative, the same way they failed before the Iraq war.

The short version: there were no WMDs in Iraq. That was a lie and the media promoted it shamelessly while silencing skeptical voices. Now Mueller has indicted zero Americans for working with Russia to influence the election. Russiagate was a lie and the media promoted it shamelessly while silencing skeptical voices.

The same goes for the politicians, alongside Hayden, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey, who told Americans that the president they elected was a spy working against the United States. None of that was accidental. It was a narrative they desperately wanted to be true so they could profit politically regardless of what it did to the nation. And today the whitewashing is already ongoing (watch out for tweets containing the word “regardless”).

The New York Post lists the top media “news” people who got it most wrong the whole time, including Rachel Maddow and Joe Scarborough on cable, Bill Kristol and Max Boot in the print media, Benjamin Wittes and Lawrence Tribe in the twitterverse, and Alec Baldwin and Joy Behar on Network TV.

And here is Glenn Greenwald appearing on Fox with Tucker Carlson. Greenwald scolds the media’s government flunkies CNN and MSNBC for not only being propagandists for the national security establishment’s narrative, but for intentionally banning actual investigative journalists from appearing on their networks.

Brexit Delays Annoying? Try Transgender Censorship in the U.K.

As Theresa May and the other anti-Brexit forces continue to delay the inevitable, there are other issues going on in England these days. Such as the criminalization of speech and opinions that go against the irrational consensus.

Law professor Jonathan Turley has written extensively on the criminalization of speech in the U.K., and now has a post on how a columnist for the U.K. Catholic Universe, Caroline Farrow, had apparently online “misgendered” the child of a transgender rights activist named Susie Green. (Actually it’s the obnoxious activist who is “misgendering” her kid!)

The wacko activist Susie Green then had Farrow charged with violating the “Malicious Communications Act,” although, according to WND, Green has already dropped the complaint.

You see, what Caroline Farrow did, Telling the Truth, referring to Green’s son as “male” or as a “boy,” or “he” or “him,” was taken by the moron activist as an offense. (It’s the activist who calls her son a “daughter” who is offensive!)

Meanwhile, Farrow, the alleged “offender,” has been subject to “violent and sexual threats,” and “doxxing” of her kids. But that’s okay as far as England’s police are concerned. Incorrect pronouns, not so much. Ooooh, incorrect pronouns (that aren’t even incorrect!).

Get this. The transgender “rights” activist, Susie Green, lobbies for medical interventions for transgender children. According to WND, “(Green’s) son, Jackie, was born male and known at first as Jack. But he began puberty blockers at 13 and went to Thailand at the age of 16 for surgery, a procedure that now is illegal in the U.K. for those iunder 18.”

“Illegal in the U.K.”?? Hmm. I wonder why THAT is?

Farrow had apparently called Green a “child abuser.” Ya think? Children and teens are still in their very important emotional and physical development stages. Tampering with their hormones and bodies in such a personal and intimate way, in my view, really is “child abuse.”

And, according to Johns Hopkins psychiatrist Paul McHugh, the vast majority of children who experience feelings of or express interests in being the opposite sex are merely going through a phase and generally grow out of it at some point. So, in my view, to engage in the chemical abuse with “puberty blockers” and slicing and dicing really is a form of child abuse, and people who are rational and empathic really have a right to say that and really ought to tell the truth about it.

Unfortunately, Western society now is being run or controlled more and more by the freaks and misfits, the tyrants and totalitarians who want to forcibly silence those who criticize their idiocy and especially their abusiveness against children.

We also have a right to criticize people in other areas who deserve it, such as the fascist ruler of the U.K. Theresa May who has along with her statist cohorts been attempting to sabotage the U.K. voters’ Brexit since two years ago — because those statists and centralists (such as Theresa May) just can’t let go of their goddamn powers and controls!

In Soviet Amerika, Don’t Dis the Gubmint

Former CIA agent and whistleblower John Kiriakou has a piece about an activist Martin Gottesfeld who has received 10 years in prison for hacking computers at Boston Children’s Hospital and causing a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) for 2 weeks. Gottesfeld believed that he was acting appropriately given that the hospital criminally kidnapped a teenager, Justina Pelletier, and aided and abetted Justina’s kidnapping away from her parents by Massachusetts DCF, based on a disagreement between doctors and Justina’s parents.

As I wrote in this post, I don’t believe that Gottesfeld’s hacking and DDoS attack was justified.

I have written extensively on the Justina Pelletier case, most recently noting that Justina’s father Lou Pelletier thinks their lawsuit against Boston Children’s Hospital may come to trial around January of 2020.

Check out the website MedicalKidnap.com, which has story after story about how hospitals and CPS/DCF agencies kidnap and imprison innocent children for the sake of research, as well as for the sake of power-mad practitioners who love to grab kids and abuse them.

In his recent article linked above, Kiriakou states that the judge in Gottesfeld’s trial was Nathaniel Gorton, the same judge who persecuted computer programmer and Internet activist Aaron Swartz who was mercilessly driven to suicide by evil prosecutors, as I wrote about in this post. The difference between Swartz and Gottesfeld is that Swartz didn’t actually do anything criminal, but Gottesfeld did.

Kiriakou also mentioned in his article that because Gottesfeld has been writing about criminality and corruption in the DOJ and his judge’s alleged conflicts of interest, Gottesfeld was then placed in solitary confinement and will be put into a facility in which all his mail will be read, all communications monitored, really something out of Soviet prison kind of stuff.

Only in Soviet Amerika.

New Zealand Going More Fascist in Shooting Aftermath

According to Zero Hedge, New Zealand authorities are now threatening to jail people for “possessing” or downloading or distributing the mosque shooting livestream video. So, given that the video the shooter himself allegedly livestreamed during the alleged attack is evidence, the gubmint in New Zealand is intentionally encouraging people to suppress, hide or cover up the video evidence, and threatening people if they don’t oblige the rulers in the cover-up mandate. Should this be considered obstruction of justice?

Additionally, the NZ Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, wants to put even more and stricter gun control laws on the books. Hey, Jacinda, criminals don’t obey the law, so they will still get their guns. And if they can’t get their guns and if they are intent on killing innocent people they will stab them or drive vehicles into them, such as in France when a psychopath drove a truck into crowds and killed 84 people. (Should we ban cars and trucks and vans?) A further example is Connecticut with the strictest gun control laws, at the time of the Sandy Hook School shooting was the 5th strictest gun-controlled state. But that didn’t stop Adam Lanza from shooting and murdering 25 or 30 innocent people, most of them children.

So, as the rulers of these “democracies” including the U.S. become more hysterical every time there’s a shooting, they and their hysterical supporters continue to turn to more police-state restrictions on the right of the people to keep and bear arms (as these government bureaucrats themselves continue to arm themselves to the teeth), and more police-state restrictions on the right of the people to the freedom of speech and their right to disseminate information.

Government censorship and gun-grabbing does not turn out well for the people. We know that from history.

Is Amazon.com Banning and Censoring Truthful Historical Books?

Paul Craig Roberts says that “whites were slaves in North Africa before blacks were slaves in the New World.” He has a lengthy article in which he cites important facts of history, and exposes how the political correctness fascists are censoring history, such as Amazon.com banning certain books telling actual history that the college campus loony-tunes don’t want their brainwashed inductees to know about. In the name of protecting black people’s and Jewish people’s victimhood identity, the censors don’t want people to know the truth.

Roberts links to another controversial article by Ron Unz, on Amazon’s book censorship and banning black historiography during Black History Month. Unz gets into those issues including the truth about the ADL.

Now, before anyone shouts, “Racist! Anti-Semite!” etc., etc., please actually read the articles.