Skip to content

On Censorship of the Truth and Science

In reference to my recent post on investigative reporter Jon Rappoport’s WordPress.com blog taken down by the truth censors a week ago, he has written an update on that which is appearing on Activist Post. One important topic that he writes about is the vaccine issue, and I was speculating that that might be why the truth censors are censoring his blog now.

On his recent update, Rappoport writes

Why did they censor me? Was it my articles about toxic vaccines, about freedom of the individual vs. the State, about the CIA, about Obama, about Trump, about political liars, about medical drugs killing millions of people? Lots to choose from. Who really cares what it was exactly? It was CENSORSHIP.

I wasn’t laying out charts for building H-bombs. WordPress shut down my blog without notice or warning or explanation. However, I see no reason to stop writing. So I’m keeping on. I’ve got people employing “other means” to get the blog back up. Regardless, here I am.

And he writes, regarding the difference between being informed/knowledgeable and censorship:

In the 1950s, we had, in the US, a Red Scare. It consisted of Communist ideology. The question was, should students be allowed to read the Communist Manifesto, or should Marx’s pamphlet be burned and banned? The knee-jerk reaction was: ban the booklet. The minority opinion was: let students read it and understand it. But of course, the American school system hadn’t prepared pupils to analyze ANYTHING.

So there was no solution. The whole Red Scare faded away eventually, as a “kinder, gentler” Leftist ideology spread through the country like ink on a blotter.

EDUCATION SHOULD PREPARE PEOPLE TO MAKE UP THEIR OWN MINDS THROUGH THOUGHT AND LOGIC.

Censorship is the coward’s way out.

Censorship works when evil people accumulate enough power. This power CAN BE affected when a strong enough public reaction occurs. That’s called a clue.

As I wrote in my initial post on Jon Rappoport’s blog being taken down, in the news and on mainstream media we hear a lot of hysteria and propaganda on the vaccine issue. Especially now with the measles outbreak. Hysterical news media and establishment pharma-paid doctors are beating the drums with false information that the measles outbreak is being caused by unvaccinated people, yet the opposite is true. Studies are finding that the measles outbreaks are more among vaccinated populations, and because the vaccine itself is not effective.

The pharmaceutical industry definitely has a stranglehold on today’s establishment “doctors,” while those who cite studies questioning the vaccines or other pharmaceutical drugs are stifled.

Another item of propaganda is that studies have “debunked” the assertion that vaccines have caused injuries, especially in children, whose brains are still in important developing stages. I’ve linked to this before, but Sharyl Attkisson has this article on what the news isn’t saying about vaccine-autism studies. She details several studies, one after another. Yet, the typical response from the hypnotized and propagandized zombies is, “But that’s been debunked.” No, it’s not “debunked.”

And it isn’t just autism, but various kinds of cognitive issues, conditions and diseases including Alzheimer’s that could be in part related to vaccines. One explanation for this is the adjuvants used in vaccines, especially aluminum.

Would all the debunkers out there like to explain why the government has paid out over $4 billion in compensation for vaccine injuries, if there’s no problem with vaccines?

So, besides fascists like NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio ordering unvaccinated children to stay in even though they are not sick and pose no danger to anyone, we have the propagandists with their information control to censor the truth about this one issue, which seems to be soooo controversial that many people on both sides — the fascist side versus the freedom side — arguing for really no good reason.

And finally, it really is a matter of the right to informed choice and consent. So regarding those who want to make vaccines mandatory by law and who want to criminalize those who don’t get a vaccine, I will quote Tom Knapp on this, which I did before.

Debate Proposition:

Resolved, that there is no difference in principle between sticking a needle in someone’s body without his or her permission and sticking a penis in someone’s body without his or her permission.
Published inAuthoritarianismCensorshipCivil LibertiesFreedom of SpeechHealthPropaganda