Skip to content

Month: March 2019

Brexit Delays Annoying? Try Transgender Censorship in the U.K.

As Theresa May and the other anti-Brexit forces continue to delay the inevitable, there are other issues going on in England these days. Such as the criminalization of speech and opinions that go against the irrational consensus.

Law professor Jonathan Turley has written extensively on the criminalization of speech in the U.K., and now has a post on how a columnist for the U.K. Catholic Universe, Caroline Farrow, had apparently online “misgendered” the child of a transgender rights activist named Susie Green. (Actually it’s the obnoxious activist who is “misgendering” her kid!)

The wacko activist Susie Green then had Farrow charged with violating the “Malicious Communications Act,” although, according to WND, Green has already dropped the complaint.

You see, what Caroline Farrow did, Telling the Truth, referring to Green’s son as “male” or as a “boy,” or “he” or “him,” was taken by the moron activist as an offense. (It’s the activist who calls her son a “daughter” who is offensive!)

Meanwhile, Farrow, the alleged “offender,” has been subject to “violent and sexual threats,” and “doxxing” of her kids. But that’s okay as far as England’s police are concerned. Incorrect pronouns, not so much. Ooooh, incorrect pronouns (that aren’t even incorrect!).

Get this. The transgender “rights” activist, Susie Green, lobbies for medical interventions for transgender children. According to WND, “(Green’s) son, Jackie, was born male and known at first as Jack. But he began puberty blockers at 13 and went to Thailand at the age of 16 for surgery, a procedure that now is illegal in the U.K. for those iunder 18.”

“Illegal in the U.K.”?? Hmm. I wonder why THAT is?

Farrow had apparently called Green a “child abuser.” Ya think? Children and teens are still in their very important emotional and physical development stages. Tampering with their hormones and bodies in such a personal and intimate way, in my view, really is “child abuse.”

And, according to Johns Hopkins psychiatrist Paul McHugh, the vast majority of children who experience feelings of or express interests in being the opposite sex are merely going through a phase and generally grow out of it at some point. So, in my view, to engage in the chemical abuse with “puberty blockers” and slicing and dicing really is a form of child abuse, and people who are rational and empathic really have a right to say that and really ought to tell the truth about it.

Unfortunately, Western society now is being run or controlled more and more by the freaks and misfits, the tyrants and totalitarians who want to forcibly silence those who criticize their idiocy and especially their abusiveness against children.

We also have a right to criticize people in other areas who deserve it, such as the fascist ruler of the U.K. Theresa May who has along with her statist cohorts been attempting to sabotage the U.K. voters’ Brexit since two years ago — because those statists and centralists (such as Theresa May) just can’t let go of their goddamn powers and controls!

Gov. Matt Bevin: Will Not Kowtow to Vaccine Hysteria

Wow, things sure are different now than they were when I was a kid during the 1960s and ’70s. When it comes to chickenpox or measles, or other illnesses, there was not the mass hysteria that we have these days. Today’s mass hysteria is based on ignorance, fear mongering and propaganda. Are you on the side of rationality, or hysteria?

The latest issue: Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin has stated that he intentionally allowed his 9 kids to get chickenpox as a way for their immune systems to safely protect themselves from future exposure. Well, good for him!

Bevin says the government has no right to force people to get a vaccine or to force parents to inflict vaccines on their kids, whose vulnerable brains are still in the important early developing stages. I agree.

Some vaccines contain harmful elements such as aluminum and mercury, and for some people the risks involved in getting chicken pox, or measles or the flu, are not as dangerous as whatever risks may be involved with vaccines.

Now, some parents are going against the “anti-vaxxers,” and supporting mandatory vaccines for kids. In my view, many people including doctors are ignorant and hysterical and basing their fears on myths. For example, if your kid is vaccinated, why are you concerned whether or not another kid in the classroom has been vaccinated? If your kid is vaccinated then he is immune to and protected from whatever that particular vaccine addresses. Right? But noooo, the hysterical parents still want to force ALL kids to get a vaccine. (Because, what they are really saying is, they are admitting that the vaccine is not effective. If they believed the vaccine to be effective, they would not worry about their own vaccinated kid contracting chicken pox or whatever from other, non-vaccinated kids.)

According to this article, the CDC states, “Chickenpox can be serious and can lead to severe complications and death, even in healthy children. There is no way to tell in advance how severe your child’s symptoms will be. So it is not worth taking the chance of exposing your child to someone with the disease.”

That’s just hysteria. According to the CDC, one in 60,000 kids might die from getting chickenpox. But this is regarding reported cases. It’s probably closer to one in 100,000 or even fewer, because most people don’t report their kids’ chickenpox. And also, the key factor to whether people’s immune systems can resist diseases is not vaccines but nutrition. Many people especially nowadays are malnourished, because they are eating junk or processed foods and don’t conscientiously have a nutritious diet. I can’t believe some of the crap that some mothers give their kids.

And by the way, regarding the hysteria that the CDC and all the Establishment doctors are exhibiting and their fear mongering, this recent article on measles propaganda is well worth your time. It notes (Go to linked article for footnotes and links),

According to the CDC, the last recorded measles-associated death in the U.S. occurred in 2015. But even before the measles vaccine was introduced and given to children in the early 1960s, the annual death toll from measles in the U.S. was between 450 and 500, and never approached the high death rate of smallpox, which was a far more deadly disease, and which prompted calls for states to pass mandatory smallpox vaccination laws for children.

While any death, for any reason, is tragic, it is reasonable to ask whether it makes sense to mandate that children receive vaccines for diseases with low mortality rates when there are many other causes of death that are not only easier to prevent but would save far more lives.

According to a special report on child mortality published 2018 in The New England Journal of Medicine, 20,360 children aged 1 to 19 died in 2016; it goes on to list the top 10 causes of death in this age group.

Twenty percent of deaths (4,074 children) were caused by motor vehicle crashes, which came in at No. 1, followed by firearm-related injuries at 15 percent (3,143 deaths). In terms of disease, cancer was the primary cause of death (1,853 deaths), followed by suffocation (1,430 deaths) and drowning (995 deaths). A total of 982 children died from drug overdoses. Heart disease killed 599 children and chronic lower respiratory disease took the lives of 274.

One thing that the hysterical CDC and many, many pro-mandatory vaccine doctors fail to note is the money, money, money that the pharmaceutical industry rakes in from their vaccines, the symbiotic relationship between many doctors and the pharmaceutical industry, and the revolving door between pharma execs/members of their boards and the CDC and FDA.

Sharyl Attkisson wrote about what the news isn’t saying about vaccine-autism studies, and has this page of links to many articles on the subject of vaccines. Now, for those of you who really believe the myth and propaganda that “science is settled” and vaccine links to neurological problems have been “debunked,” then you have been relying too much on mainstream media propaganda and not actual truth, in my view.

So good for Gov. Matt Bevin for sticking to the principle of FREEDOM and freedom of choice in letting his kids develop immunity naturally (which is healthier and longer lasting) rather than poisoning them with vaccines containing harmful elements.

More News and Commentary

Jon Rappoport on covert chemical warfare: 100,000 deaths a year.

Daisy Luther explains how ugly and personal the vaccine debate has become.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe gives European statists a good what for on the Brexit issue.

Thomas DiLorenzo asks, What are socialism’s dirty secrets that must be kept from America’s youth?

Charles Burris discusses how the deep state came to America.

Adam Johnson says that Bloomberg’s military contractor-funded columnist wants you to know that military spending is woke.

And a Reuters article about a recent study which found that some ADHD patients taking Adderall or other anti-ADHD drugs had symptoms of psychosis. (That’s news?)

Medicare and Medicaid: The Root Cause of America’s Healthcare Crisis

Now, many people really believe that government programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, were necessary to be imposed on the people to help the people. Many people are indoctrinated to believe that after many years of government-controlled schooling. Those programs are a given, a normal part of everyday life, they have been made to believe.

However, Jacob Hornberger discusses why those programs are the root cause of today’s healthcare crisis. Those are socialist programs, which involve redistribution of wealth to fund them, and government central planning to administer them.

It was a new system of government central planning imposed by political operatives and bureaucrats to replace the old system of freedom and free markets.

Hornberger describes how things used to be in America with healthcare:

The United States once had the finest healthcare system in the world. It was one based on no government involvement in healthcare. It was a free-market healthcare system. Advances in healthcare were occurring at a phenomenal rate. Doctors absolutely loved what they did in life. Healthcare services were reasonably priced.

In fact, hardly anyone had major medical insurance. That’s because healthcare costs were considered just an ordinary part of life, sort of like periodic car repairs. The price of healthcare stayed within reasonable boundaries.

The poor had no problems receiving treatment by both physicians and hospitals. I grew up in Laredo, Texas, which the Census Bureau said was the poorest city in the United States. Every day the doctors’ offices were filled with patients, some from Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, which was on the other side of the Rio Grande. The doctors knew that many of them could not pay for the treatment. It didn’t matter. I never heard of a case where doctors turned away anyone for inability to pay. And Laredo doctors were among the richest people in turn, second only to the oil families. They didn’t begrudge giving people free healthcare, especially since they were making so much money from everyone who could pay.

That’s the way things should be: a way of life in which healthcare is based on the free market and where charity is voluntary, not mandated through the force of the IRS or any welfare-state bureaucracy. A free-market healthcare system is precisely why the United States once had the finest healthcare system in the world.

Everything began going south with the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid in the 1960s…

And, as Hornberger points out, one socialist intervention after another has been imposed to try to fix the terrible effects of the previous socialist interventions, including ObamaCare, and on and on. Now the socialists want “Medicare for All,” i.e. Soviet-style top-down authoritarian-imposed medicine.

By the way, speaking of Soviet “Medicare for All,” Anna Ebeling, who was born and raised in the Soviet Union, wrote an article on how the Bolsheviks wanted to destroy the medical care system of Old Russia in the name of utopia, just like today’s “Democrats” want to do. And look what they did! And former Gorbachev-era Soviet economist and then dissident and defector Yuri Maltsev also tells us what Soviet medicine teaches us.

Beto O’Rourke: Just Another Perv Pol

Robert Francis O’Rourke, a.k.a. Beto O’Rourke, a Democrat running for President, has recently apologized for his “white privilege.” Well excuse me, Beto, but I’m white, and where’s my privilege? And what about all the black and Hispanic people who benefit from affirmative action at the expense of white people? Who’s privileged there?

There. Now that I’ve gotten all that out of the way, I can say that Beto O’Rourke does NOT have “white privilege.” He has wealth privilege. Net worth of $9 million as of 2015, and he married the daughter of a real estate tycoon who is estimated to be worth about $500 million. So he’s extremely rich as is his wife, so why such an insatiable desire to grab political power over the masses? If he really wants to help people, he can set up charities and other things. But no, I do not believe he’s any different from the average corrupt sleazebag misfit politician psychopath.

What else do we know about Beto O’Rourke? Well, supposedly he is an “impulsive prankster,” according to the Daily Caller. For instance, he pranked his wife by “putting baby poop in a bowl and telling her that it was avocado.” She may have actually eaten the baby poop. (Hope I haven’t ruined anyone’s lunch here.) He also supposedly pranks his wife with “‘Psycho’-style scares in the shower.” Hmm, we sure do want this guy as President, don’t we? What a guy.

Beto O’Rourke also belonged to a popular computer hacking group known as “Cult of the Dead Cow,” according to Reuters, whose reporter acknowledged sitting on the story until after O’Rourke’s failed challenge against Sen. Ted Scruz in 2018. (Hmm, since when do reporters ever sit on a story to protect a politician? That never happens!)

O’Rourke is truly one sick puppy who has also fantasized about murdering children, and he wrote a poem that included the words, “wax my ass, scrub my balls.” Maybe if he becomes President Beto can join the club of all the other sickos, perverts, sadists and terrorists we Amerikans have employed in the Oval Office.

He probably couldn’t be any worse than Kamala Harris who wants to jail the parents of kids who don’t go to government indoctrination prisons, or Elizabeth Warren in which Liawatha fraudulently claims to be a Native American as a means of career-climbing or her neurotic dictatorial lust to control every infinitesimal aspect of private companies’ boards of directors and hiring practices.

These people are really sick, evil degenerates. But, this is what we get when we have elections. Why do you still vote?

In Soviet Amerika, Don’t Dis the Gubmint

Former CIA agent and whistleblower John Kiriakou has a piece about an activist Martin Gottesfeld who has received 10 years in prison for hacking computers at Boston Children’s Hospital and causing a distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) for 2 weeks. Gottesfeld believed that he was acting appropriately given that the hospital criminally kidnapped a teenager, Justina Pelletier, and aided and abetted Justina’s kidnapping away from her parents by Massachusetts DCF, based on a disagreement between doctors and Justina’s parents.

As I wrote in this post, I don’t believe that Gottesfeld’s hacking and DDoS attack was justified.

I have written extensively on the Justina Pelletier case, most recently noting that Justina’s father Lou Pelletier thinks their lawsuit against Boston Children’s Hospital may come to trial around January of 2020.

Check out the website, which has story after story about how hospitals and CPS/DCF agencies kidnap and imprison innocent children for the sake of research, as well as for the sake of power-mad practitioners who love to grab kids and abuse them.

In his recent article linked above, Kiriakou states that the judge in Gottesfeld’s trial was Nathaniel Gorton, the same judge who persecuted computer programmer and Internet activist Aaron Swartz who was mercilessly driven to suicide by evil prosecutors, as I wrote about in this post. The difference between Swartz and Gottesfeld is that Swartz didn’t actually do anything criminal, but Gottesfeld did.

Kiriakou also mentioned in his article that because Gottesfeld has been writing about criminality and corruption in the DOJ and his judge’s alleged conflicts of interest, Gottesfeld was then placed in solitary confinement and will be put into a facility in which all his mail will be read, all communications monitored, really something out of Soviet prison kind of stuff.

Only in Soviet Amerika.

More News and Commentary

Bill Sardi has an important article debunking the anti-eggs and anti-cholesterol propaganda, and promoting vitamin C.

Target Liberty with an exchange between New Jersey libertarian activist Murray Sabrin and a USA Today columnist on libertarianism.

Zero Hedge with the best analysis of what really happened to the Boeing 737 Max from a pilot and software engineer.

Per Bylund on socialist time ignorance, subjective value, and anarchism: a world of sovereigns.

And Donald Boudreaux says, In free markets, “balls” and “strikes” are called only by consumers.

New Zealand Going More Fascist in Shooting Aftermath

According to Zero Hedge, New Zealand authorities are now threatening to jail people for “possessing” or downloading or distributing the mosque shooting livestream video. So, given that the video the shooter himself allegedly livestreamed during the alleged attack is evidence, the gubmint in New Zealand is intentionally encouraging people to suppress, hide or cover up the video evidence, and threatening people if they don’t oblige the rulers in the cover-up mandate. Should this be considered obstruction of justice?

Additionally, the NZ Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, wants to put even more and stricter gun control laws on the books. Hey, Jacinda, criminals don’t obey the law, so they will still get their guns. And if they can’t get their guns and if they are intent on killing innocent people they will stab them or drive vehicles into them, such as in France when a psychopath drove a truck into crowds and killed 84 people. (Should we ban cars and trucks and vans?) A further example is Connecticut with the strictest gun control laws, at the time of the Sandy Hook School shooting was the 5th strictest gun-controlled state. But that didn’t stop Adam Lanza from shooting and murdering 25 or 30 innocent people, most of them children.

So, as the rulers of these “democracies” including the U.S. become more hysterical every time there’s a shooting, they and their hysterical supporters continue to turn to more police-state restrictions on the right of the people to keep and bear arms (as these government bureaucrats themselves continue to arm themselves to the teeth), and more police-state restrictions on the right of the people to the freedom of speech and their right to disseminate information.

Government censorship and gun-grabbing does not turn out well for the people. We know that from history.

Some Misc. Items

So this is quite a not good day for me and I will just post some comments and some links. The New Zealand mosque mass shooting. I heard the U.S. ambassador to New Zealand, former Sen. Scott Brown on various radio shows and I didn’t hear him make the point that if someone in the mosque had been armed he or she could have saved many lives by disabling the shooter. I didn’t hear Brown point out that criminals don’t obey laws against murder, assault, rape and robbery, then why would they obey gun laws? New Zealand’s current gun laws have NO respect for the right of the people to possess weapons to protect themselves and their families. People want even stricter gun laws? To protect the rights of criminals and “racist extremists” to shoot and kill people, apparently. Oh, well.

Scott Brown’s reelection opponent, his replacement Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the Fake Indian, wants to break up Big Tech companies. Hey Lizzie, how about breaking up Big Government agencies and bureaucracies? How about abolishing FBI, NSA, CIA, DHS, TSA, ICE, DEA, ATF, and the whole national security state apparatus? She won’t do that because she loves the national security state, just like all the other statists in Washington.

Speaking of the national security state, Zero Hedge with an article on whistleblowers saying that NSA still spies on Amerikan phones in hidden program.

And another Zero Hedge article on DOJ and Clinton lawyers wheeling and dealing to block FBI access to Clinton Foundation emails.

Jacob Hornberger asks, Should libertarians support a police state?

Thomas Knapp asks, Would social media have censored video of 9/11 or the Kennedy assassination? The Kn@ppster also posts tweets by The Donald, Obama, and Hillary, and says they’ve got a lot of nerve.

And Yvonne Lorenzo says connect the cord and cut the Wi-Fi.

Authoritarian Judges Against Freedom of Speech

You’ve probably heard about Trump flunky Roger Stone allegedly violating a “gag order” that was issued by a fascist judge who sounds more like a Maduro judge than a U.S. judge. I am not a Stone fan, but his attorneys should request that this biased judge be replaced by someone who respects the defendant’s right to freedom of speech while he is outside the courtroom.

Freedom of speech applies to everyone, including criminal defendants, witnesses and juries.

But freedom of speech also implies the freedom to not speak. LRC recently posted this article by Murray Rothbard on the right to not be compelled to speak or to testify, such as at a trial.

And occasionally we hear about a news reporter who has a source for information on a case, but the reporter protects the source’s identity. Fascist judges order the reporter to name the source or the reporter will be thrown in jail. Chances are, reporters will protect a source for a story that’s revealing some kind of criminality or corruption on the part of government bureaucrats (or sometimes someone in business). The fascists want to protect their fellow corruptocrats and criminals, so they throw reporters in jail. One example was news producer Mary Richards on TV.

Another example in real life has been Bradley Manning, now known as Chelsea, who revealed corruption and criminality in the U.S. military and diplomats, as I referred to just recently.

Sadly, most government bureaucrats, including trial judges, seem to have this compulsion to either silence people or compel or coerce them to speak.